一键导入
map
Show or update the mapping between literature and thesis chapters — which sources support which arguments. Use for tracking coverage.
用 Codex 或 Claude 帮你安装 复制这段 Prompt,粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里,让它检查 Skill 页面并帮你完成安装。
菜单
Show or update the mapping between literature and thesis chapters — which sources support which arguments. Use for tracking coverage.
用 Codex 或 Claude 帮你安装 复制这段 Prompt,粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里,让它检查 Skill 页面并帮你完成安装。
基于 SOC 职业分类
Use when AI-assisted thesis edits risk claim drift, scope creep, loss of author control, or repeated revisions that fail to converge; provides spine cards, edit contracts, drift audits, revision escalation, and human gates.
Stop repeated failed writing, coding, manuscript, rebuttal, or restructuring revisions when the same issue has gone through 3+ unsatisfactory edits, vague feedback such as still wrong/weird/unclear/weak/越改越乱, version contamination, or possible gap/claim/evidence/venue-fit drift.
Build and audit the manuscript argument system: intent, gap-contribution alignment, hierarchical claims, evidence balance, limitations, and reviewer attack surfaces. Use when a paper, thesis chapter, review article, or rebuttal needs explicit intent registers, contribution chains, claim hierarchy, argument maps, evidence-fit checks, or reviewer-risk matrices before drafting, revision, peer review, or self-review.
Review another author's manuscript, paper, thesis chapter, proposal, or preprint as an external reviewer. Use when asked to evaluate novelty, significance, gap-contribution fit, claim-evidence adequacy, methods, evaluation, overclaim risks, structure, writing, required revisions, or recommendation without rewriting the manuscript or using private author context.
Review the user's own manuscript, paper, thesis chapter, rebuttal, or release packet with clean-room anti-contamination controls. Use when asked for self-review, internal review, pre-submission review, readiness check, reviewer simulation on own work, or claim-evidence self-audit where prior chat memory, unstated assumptions, model background knowledge, or unlisted local notes must not be treated as evidence.
Reframe academic manuscript drafts that read like engineering reports, module inventories, internal validation packets, or system notes into paper-form scientific arguments with clear gap, contribution chain, results narrative, figure/table roles, AI-assisted component boundaries, and submission-readiness blockers.
| name | map |
| description | Show or update the mapping between literature and thesis chapters — which sources support which arguments. Use for tracking coverage. |
| allowed-tools | Read, Glob, Grep, Edit, Write |
Build and display a mapping matrix showing which literature sources support which thesis chapters. Identify coverage gaps where chapters lack sufficient source support.
This skill activates on: map, show mapping, coverage, which sources, /map.
Scan all notes files in literature/reading_notes/ using Glob (*_NOTES.md). For each file, extract:
# Reading Notes: heading)Status field valueRelevance field value## Thesis Connections tableScan chapter files in chapters/ to get the list of chapters and their section headings.
Build the mapping matrix. Rows are sources (sorted alphabetically by author), columns are chapters (Ch1 through Ch8 or however many exist).
supports, challenges, extends).Identify coverage gaps. Flag any chapter that has fewer than 3 mapped sources as "under-covered".
Output the mapping.
## Literature-Thesis Mapping -- {YYYY-MM-DD}
### Matrix
| Source | Status | Ch1 | Ch2 | Ch3 | Ch4 | Ch5 | Ch6 | Ch7 | Ch8 |
|--------|--------|-----|-----|-----|-----|-----|-----|-----|-----|
| Smith (2024) | integrated | | supports | supports | | | | | |
| Jones (2021) | integrated | extends | supports | supports | extends | | | | |
| Lee (2019) | completed | | | supports | | | challenges | | challenges |
### Coverage Summary
| Chapter | Mapped Sources | Status |
|---------|---------------|--------|
| Ch1 | {N} | OK / Under-covered |
| Ch2 | {N} | OK / Under-covered |
### Under-covered Chapters
{List chapters with < 3 sources, with suggestions for which completed-but-not-yet-mapped notes might fill the gap.}
If the user says "save" or "export mapping", write the matrix to literature/mapping_matrix.md using Edit (if the file exists) or Write (if creating new). Include a timestamp header.
chapters/ directory.{Author} ({Year}) for readability.Connection Type column in notes files. If that column is missing, infer from the Relevance field.