| name | rationale-selection |
| description | Select the minimal set of 1-3 verbatim sentences from a candidate paper/abstract sufficient to entail or refute an atomic claim (SciFact's rationale-selection step). Use this after claim-writing has produced an atomic claim, as the evidence-gathering step before claim-label-prediction; an empty rationale set is a valid outcome, not an error. |
| version | 1.0.0 |
| category | paper-reading |
| type | sop |
| execution | subagent |
| prompt | ./prompt.md |
| input | atomic_claim (string), source_path (string), meta_path (string) |
| reads | full paper — the entailing sentences may be anywhere |
| output | rationale_sentences (list of strings, 0-3 items) |
| dependencies | {"sops":["spawn-agent"]} |
Rationale Selection
Selects minimal evidentiary sentence set for a claim — middle step of the SciFact 3-chain, added to close coverage-audit finding S7 (the original graph jumped straight from claim-writing to a three-way label judgment with no evidence-selection step, even though the tag table's own stated output anchor explicitly requires rationale sentences alongside the label).
Execution
Subagent — spawned via spawn-agent skill.
Available SOPs
| SOP | When to use |
|---|
| spawn-agent | Spawn a customized CC subagent with full MCP tool access. |