用 Codex 或 Claude 帮你安装 复制这段 Prompt,粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里,让它检查 Skill 页面并帮你完成安装。
直接命令不会经过审查 Prompt;运行前请先检查来源。
npx skills add https://github.com/yogsoth-ai/de-anthropocentric-research-engine --skill challenge-operation命令会保持在同一行。复制前请横向滚动并检查完整内容。
想先保存到本地?可下载 SkillsMP 当前能够提供的文件。
Strategy: Dialectic engine retuned for truth-seeking, not survival. A defender steelmans a claim into its MOST falsifiable form, a critic attacks to refute it, a judge classifies the exchange into BROKEN/CORROBORATED/UNFALSIFIABLE — the judge does NOT pick a winner or score persuasiveness. Methods: Irving debate (repurposed), Toulmin argumentation, Mayo severe testing.
Campaign: Logical extreme and boundary testing via reductio ad absurdum and edge-case analysis. Core question: Does this artifact collapse under logical limits and boundary conditions? Methods: Lakatos 1976, Dutilh Novaes 2016, BVA, Flyvbjerg Critical Case, Popper.
Campaign for mapping argument structures — extract claims, link evidence, assess strength, synthesize positions. Produces argument graphs in the wiki vault.
基于 SOC 职业分类
正在显示 SKILL.md
| name | challenge-operation |
| description | Non-threatening 'Why?' questioning of current practices (de Bono Challenge) |
| execution | strategy |
| dependencies | {"sops":["alternatives-generation","challenge-questioning","escape-technique","lateral-synthesis"],"tactics":["concept-hierarchy"]} |
Apply de Bono's Challenge technique: non-threatening questioning of why things are done the way they are. Not criticism — genuine curiosity about whether current approaches are the only way.
| Resource | Target | Current | % |
|---|---|---|---|
| web-search | 20 | 0 | 0% |
| web-research | 8 | 0 | 0% |
| paper-overview | 20 | 0 | 0% |
| paper-search | 12 | 0 | 0% |
| paper-research | 5 | 0 | 0% |
Cannot exit strategy until ≥80% of each budget line is consumed OR yield targets are met with justification for remaining budget.
| Tactic | Role |
|---|---|
| concept-hierarchy | Organize challenged practices into concept levels |
| SOP | Role |
|---|---|
| challenge-questioning | Apply non-threatening 'Why?' to current practices |
| escape-technique | Escape from dominant patterns revealed by challenge |
| alternatives-generation | Generate alternatives to challenged practices |
| lateral-synthesis | Synthesize challenge operation outputs |
Optional, no fixed order; the final leaf is always a sop.
| Tactic | When to use |
|---|---|
| concept-hierarchy | Build concept levels from purpose through concepts to ideas, with escape and fractionation at each level. |
Optional, no fixed order; the final leaf is always a sop.
| SOP | When to use |
|---|---|
| alternatives-generation | Generate alternatives for every known approach — ensure no approach goes unchallenged. |
| challenge-questioning | Non-threatening 'Why?' questioning of current practices to reveal historical accidents vs. genuine constraints. |
| escape-technique | Identify dominant thinking pattern and escape it via deliberate pattern-breaking. |
| lateral-synthesis | Synthesize all lateral thinking intermediate outputs into a structured idea report. |