| name | deep-insight |
| description | Deep Insight Engine with 5 campaigns (gap-analysis, insight, boundary-analysis, sensitivity-analysis, problem-reformulation). Use this skill whenever a user needs to deeply analyze research gaps, understand root causes, probe method boundaries, assess assumption sensitivity, or reformulate research problems. Pre-condition: north-star-crystallization complete + knowledge-acquisition campaign has produced initial findings. |
| dependencies | {"campaigns":["boundary-analysis","deep-insight-sensitivity-analysis","gap-analysis","insight","problem-reformulation"]} |
Deep Insight
Deep insight engine — from surface phenomena to root causes, boundaries, assumptions, and the problem itself. Five campaigns, each a self-contained autonomous analysis domain. You provide a research gap or finding — the engine routes to the right campaign, selects a strategy, and executes autonomously with quantitative budget enforcement.
Design Philosophy
Strategy Book mode. This file is a textbook, not a script. CC reads, internalizes principles, then autonomously constructs the analysis approach for the specific research situation.
Hard constraints only:
- Budget Gate: Meet the strategy's quantitative floor (±10%) before completing
- Minimum Yield: Per-tactic hard floors on output quality
- HARD-GATE: Pre-conditions must be satisfied before entry
- Context-checkpoint: Triggered after each strategy completes
Everything else — execution order, iteration count, tactic selection, SOP combination — is CC's autonomous decision.
Pre-conditions
- North-star-crystallization must be complete (research intent crystallized)
- Knowledge-acquisition campaign must have produced initial findings (gaps, patterns, anomalies)
Four-Level Hierarchy
ENTRY.md (this file)
→ Campaign (5): self-contained deep analysis domain
→ Strategy: selected by analysis purpose/intent
→ Tactic: multi-step orchestration pattern (reusable across strategies)
→ SOP: single operation (import or subagent)
CC can skip the tactic layer and use SOPs directly when the task is simple enough.
Campaign Routing
| Signal | Campaign |
|---|
| gap identification, gap classification, evidence mapping, prioritization, gap validation | → gap-analysis |
| root-cause analysis, stakeholders, tensions, HMW, assumption audit, 5 Whys | → insight |
| validity boundaries, method failure, robustness, distribution shift, scaling limits | → boundary-analysis |
| assumption ranking, sensitivity, variance decomposition, uncertainty propagation, critical path | → sensitivity-analysis |
| redefining the problem, dominant ideas, multiple perspectives, double-loop learning, wicked problems | → problem-reformulation |
Multi-Campaign Orchestration
Campaigns can be composed:
- "Understand this gap deeply": gap-analysis → insight
- "Is this method reliable": boundary-analysis → sensitivity-analysis
- "Are we solving the wrong problem": problem-reformulation (may loop back to gap-analysis)
- Full deep dive: gap-analysis → insight → boundary-analysis → sensitivity-analysis → problem-reformulation
The orchestrator decides composition based on the research state and user intent.
MCP Tools
| MCP Server | Tools |
|---|
| brave-search | brave_web_search, brave_news_search, brave_llm_context |
| apify | rag-web-browser, google-scholar-scraper |
| alphaxiv | discover_papers, get_paper_content, answer_pdf_queries, read_files_from_github_repository |
| semantic-scholar | ss_paper, ss_paper_batch, ss_references, ss_citations, ss_recommendations, ss_relevance_search, ss_author, ss_author_papers |
Context Management Integration
- Campaign start: context-init (load/create campaign context file)
- After each strategy completes: context-checkpoint (append findings to campaign context file)
- CC discretion: Additional checkpoints when information density warrants it
- One context file per campaign: format
context/deep-insight-[campaign]-[topic].md
Dependencies
| Dependency | What It Provides |
|---|
| web-browsing | web-search + web-research |
| literature-engine | literature-overview + literature-search + literature-research |
| subagent-spawning | Subagent dispatch conventions |
| context-management | Checkpoint protocol |
| north-star-crystallization | Pre-condition (research intent) |
| knowledge-acquisition | Pre-condition (initial findings) |
Available Campaigns
Optional, no fixed order; the final leaf is always a sop.
| Campaign | When to use |
|---|
| boundary-analysis | Boundary Analysis Campaign — probe where methods fail, map validity envelopes, test robustness, catalog failure modes, detect scaling limits. 5 strategies, 3 tactics, 11 subagent SOPs. |
| deep-insight-sensitivity-analysis | Sensitivity Analysis Campaign — identify which assumptions are most critical by measuring their impact on conclusions. 5 strategies (parameter-screening, variance-decomposition, assumption-criticality, uncertainty-propagation, decision-sensitivity), 3 tactics, 11 subagent SOPs. |
| gap-analysis | Gap Analysis Campaign — identify, classify, validate, and prioritize research gaps via systematic evidence mapping. 5 strategies (gap-identification, gap-classification, gap-validation, gap-prioritization, gap-synthesis), 3 tactics, 12 subagent SOPs. |
| insight | Insight Campaign — deep root-cause analysis of why research gaps persist. 5 strategies (root-cause-drilling, stakeholder-mapping, tension-mining, question-reformulation, assumption-audit), 4 tactics, 13 subagent SOPs. |
| problem-reformulation | Problem Reformulation Campaign — question the problem itself. Escape dominant ideas, reframe from multiple perspectives, apply dialectical inquiry, assess wickedness, discover appreciative alternatives. 5 strategies, 3 tactics, 10 subagent SOPs. |