用 Codex 或 Claude 帮你安装 复制这段 Prompt,粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里,让它检查 Skill 页面并帮你完成安装。
直接命令不会经过审查 Prompt;运行前请先检查来源。
npx skills add https://github.com/yogsoth-ai/de-anthropocentric-research-engine --skill general-morphological-analysis命令会保持在同一行。复制前请横向滚动并检查完整内容。
想先保存到本地?可下载 SkillsMP 当前能够提供的文件。
Strategy: Dialectic engine retuned for truth-seeking, not survival. A defender steelmans a claim into its MOST falsifiable form, a critic attacks to refute it, a judge classifies the exchange into BROKEN/CORROBORATED/UNFALSIFIABLE — the judge does NOT pick a winner or score persuasiveness. Methods: Irving debate (repurposed), Toulmin argumentation, Mayo severe testing.
Campaign: Logical extreme and boundary testing via reductio ad absurdum and edge-case analysis. Core question: Does this artifact collapse under logical limits and boundary conditions? Methods: Lakatos 1976, Dutilh Novaes 2016, BVA, Flyvbjerg Critical Case, Popper.
Campaign for mapping argument structures — extract claims, link evidence, assess strength, synthesize positions. Produces argument graphs in the wiki vault.
基于 SOC 职业分类
正在显示 SKILL.md
| name | general-morphological-analysis |
| description | Ritchey GMA: complete iterative morphological process |
| execution | strategy |
| dependencies | {"sops":["combination-evaluation","creative-ideation-consistency-pair-evaluation","matrix-construction","morphological-synthesis","path-generation","solution-space-reduction","value-enumeration","white-space-detection"],"tactics":["creative-ideation-consistency-checking","white-space-identification"]} |
Ritchey's complete iterative GMA process: problem structuring → morphological field → CCA → solution space exploration → synthesis.
| Resource | Target | Current | % |
|---|---|---|---|
| web-search | 30 | 0 | 0% |
| web-research | 10 | 0 | 0% |
| paper-overview | 30 | 0 | 0% |
| paper-search | 20 | 0 | 0% |
| paper-research | 8 | 0 | 0% |
Cannot exit strategy until ≥80% of each budget line is consumed OR yield targets are met with justification for remaining budget.
| Tactic | Role |
|---|---|
| combination-mapping | Enumerate parameter combinations |
| consistency-checking | CCA filtering |
| white-space-identification | Find unexplored regions |
| SOP | Role |
|---|---|
| value-enumeration | Enumerate parameter values |
| matrix-construction | Build morphological field |
| consistency-pair-evaluation | Pairwise consistency evaluation |
| solution-space-reduction | CCA space reduction |
| path-generation | Generate solution paths |
| white-space-detection | Detect unexplored regions |
| combination-evaluation | Evaluate novel combinations |
| morphological-synthesis | Final synthesis |
Optional, no fixed order; the final leaf is always a sop.
| Tactic | When to use |
|---|---|
| creative-ideation-consistency-checking | Pairwise consistency evaluation to reduce solution space by identifying and removing inconsistent combinations. |
| white-space-identification | Identify unexplored viable regions in the morphological matrix where no existing methods operate. |
Optional, no fixed order; the final leaf is always a sop.
| SOP | When to use |
|---|---|
| combination-evaluation | Evaluate new combinations for feasibility and novelty |
| creative-ideation-consistency-pair-evaluation | Evaluate pairwise value consistency (logical/empirical/normative) |
| matrix-construction | Build n-dimensional morphological matrix |
| morphological-synthesis | Synthesize all morphological exploration outputs |
| path-generation | Generate combination paths through consistent space |
| solution-space-reduction | Apply CCA to remove inconsistent combinations |
| value-enumeration | Enumerate 3-5 values per parameter including extremes |
| white-space-detection | Identify matrix regions not covered by existing methods |