用 Codex 或 Claude 帮你安装 复制这段 Prompt,粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里,让它检查 Skill 页面并帮你完成安装。
直接命令不会经过审查 Prompt;运行前请先检查来源。
npx skills add https://github.com/yogsoth-ai/de-anthropocentric-research-engine --skill knowledge-structuring-variable-identification命令会保持在同一行。复制前请横向滚动并检查完整内容。
想先保存到本地?可下载 SkillsMP 当前能够提供的文件。
Strategy: Dialectic engine retuned for truth-seeking, not survival. A defender steelmans a claim into its MOST falsifiable form, a critic attacks to refute it, a judge classifies the exchange into BROKEN/CORROBORATED/UNFALSIFIABLE — the judge does NOT pick a winner or score persuasiveness. Methods: Irving debate (repurposed), Toulmin argumentation, Mayo severe testing.
Campaign: Logical extreme and boundary testing via reductio ad absurdum and edge-case analysis. Core question: Does this artifact collapse under logical limits and boundary conditions? Methods: Lakatos 1976, Dutilh Novaes 2016, BVA, Flyvbjerg Critical Case, Popper.
Campaign for mapping argument structures — extract claims, link evidence, assess strength, synthesize positions. Produces argument graphs in the wiki vault.
基于 SOC 职业分类
正在显示 SKILL.md
| name | knowledge-structuring-variable-identification |
| description | Identify key variables in the causal system |
| execution | strategy |
| dependencies | {"tactics":["counterfactual-reasoning","evidence-weighing"],"sops":["variable-page-creation"]} |
Systematically surface all variables that participate in the causal system under study. This strategy drives CC to read source material, extract candidate variables, create variable pages, and flag potential confounders before any mechanism edges are drawn.
CC must resist the urge to jump straight to causal edges. The quality of the entire causal model depends on having a complete, well-scoped variable inventory first. Every variable should be grounded in at least one source page, typed (exposure, outcome, mediator, moderator, confounder, or instrument), and given a plain-language description. Confounders deserve explicit flagging because they are the most common source of spurious causal claims.
| Metric | S | M | L |
|---|---|---|---|
| Variables identified | 6 | 15 | 30 |
| Source pages analyzed | 5 | 15 | 30 |
| Confounders flagged | 2 | 5 | 10 |
| Metric | Target | Current | Status |
|---------------------|--------|---------|--------|
| Variables identified | S:6 / M:15 / L:30 | 0 | ⬜ |
| Source pages analyzed | S:5 / M:15 / L:30 | 0 | ⬜ |
| Confounders flagged | S:2 / M:5 / L:10 | 0 | ⬜ |
Cannot exit until 80% of budget met. Print state ledger before each iteration decision.
Optional, no fixed order; the final leaf is always a sop.
| Tactic | When to use |
|---|---|
| counterfactual-reasoning | Tactic for reasoning about what would happen if variables were different — supports causal identification and intervention analysis. |
| evidence-weighing | Tactic for assessing the strength and relevance of evidence for causal claims — distinguishes correlation from causation. |
Optional, no fixed order; the final leaf is always a sop.
| SOP | When to use |
|---|---|
| variable-page-creation | SOP for creating a variable page in the causal model — documents a measurable quantity with its properties. |