用 Codex 或 Claude 帮你安装 复制这段 Prompt,粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里,让它检查 Skill 页面并帮你完成安装。
直接命令不会经过审查 Prompt;运行前请先检查来源。
npx skills add https://github.com/yogsoth-ai/de-anthropocentric-research-engine --skill literature-overview命令会保持在同一行。复制前请横向滚动并检查完整内容。
想先保存到本地?可下载 SkillsMP 当前能够提供的文件。
Strategy: Dialectic engine retuned for truth-seeking, not survival. A defender steelmans a claim into its MOST falsifiable form, a critic attacks to refute it, a judge classifies the exchange into BROKEN/CORROBORATED/UNFALSIFIABLE — the judge does NOT pick a winner or score persuasiveness. Methods: Irving debate (repurposed), Toulmin argumentation, Mayo severe testing.
Campaign: Logical extreme and boundary testing via reductio ad absurdum and edge-case analysis. Core question: Does this artifact collapse under logical limits and boundary conditions? Methods: Lakatos 1976, Dutilh Novaes 2016, BVA, Flyvbjerg Critical Case, Popper.
Campaign for mapping argument structures — extract claims, link evidence, assess strength, synthesize positions. Produces argument graphs in the wiki vault.
基于 SOC 职业分类
正在显示 SKILL.md
| name | literature-overview |
| description | Quick landscape scan — discover papers on a topic without full-text reading |
| type | sop |
| layer | sop |
| agents | ["alphaxiv","semantic-scholar"] |
| tools | {"alphaxiv":["discover_papers"],"semantic-scholar":["relevanceSearch"]} |
| input | query (string) |
| output | PaperList[] with title, authors, year, citationCount, abstract snippet |
| dependencies | {"sops":["literature-research","literature-search"]} |
Fast landscape scan. Understand what papers exist on a topic, who the key authors are, and rough citation counts. No full-text reading. This skill is for orientation — getting a bird's-eye view before committing to deeper reading.
Use this when you need to:
| Tool | Purpose | Returns |
|---|---|---|
alphaxiv.discover_papers | Semantic search for arXiv papers | Ranked paper list with title, abstract snippet, arXiv ID |
ss.relevanceSearch | Keyword search across all venues | Title, abstract, authors, year, citationCount, paperId |
Do NOT draw conclusions about:
Abstracts are for ORIENTATION — identifying what exists and what looks promising.
For any substantive analysis, escalate to:
literature-search — read AI-summarized reports (medium depth)literature-research — read raw full text (deep)Treating abstracts as sufficient for research conclusions is PROHIBITED.
alphaxiv.discover_papers(
keywords: ["keyword1", "keyword2", "keyword3"],
question: "Detailed semantic description of desired papers",
difficulty: 3
)
Parameters:
keywords: 3-4 concise terms (method names, acronyms, authors)question: Detailed description of what papers you're looking fordifficulty: 1-10 (use 3 for overview, higher = more retrieval effort)ss.relevanceSearch(
query: "search terms",
limit: 20,
year: "2022-2024",
fields_of_study: "Computer Science"
)
Parameters:
query: keyword search stringlimit: max results (default 10, max 100)year: year range filter (e.g., "2023-2024", "2020-")fields_of_study: field filter (optional)min_citation_count: citation threshold (optional)open_access_only: boolean (optional)For each paper, present:
difficulty parameter: 1-3 for quick scans, 5-7 for thorough discovery, 8-10 for exhaustiveQuick scan: "graph neural networks for drug discovery"
# Step 1: arXiv search
alphaxiv.discover_papers(
keywords: ["GNN", "drug discovery", "molecular"],
question: "Papers applying graph neural networks to drug discovery and molecular property prediction",
difficulty: 3
)
# Step 2: Supplement
ss.relevanceSearch(
query: "graph neural network drug discovery",
limit: 15,
year: "2022-2024",
min_citation_count: 50
)
# Step 3-4: Merge, deduplicate, return sorted list
Expected output: A list of 15-30 papers with titles, authors, years, and citation counts — enough to understand the landscape and pick papers for deeper reading.
Optional, no fixed order; the final leaf is always a sop.
| SOP | When to use |
|---|---|
| literature-research | Deep literature research — raw full text reading and targeted PDF queries for rigorous analysis |
| literature-search | Medium-depth literature search — read AI-summarized reports for every paper analyzed |