菜单
Match references in a LaTeX paper against academic databases, flag entries that need review, and suggest missing DOIs or URLs. Use when checking citations or preparing a paper for submission.
用 Codex 或 Claude 帮你安装 复制这段 Prompt，粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里，让它检查 Skill 页面并帮你完成安装。
基于 SOC 职业分类
Check a LaTeX paper before submission or circulation. Verify references, compilation, LaTeX hygiene, figure quality, affiliations, acknowledgements, and code or data availability, then return one severity-ranked report.
Critique an academic manuscript for novelty, methodological rigor, causal claims, data quality, generalizability, mechanism, and presentation. Use for pre-submission review or anticipating reviewer concerns.
Review LaTeX documents for common issues, style consistency, typography, cross-references, draft artifacts, and debugging code. Use after editing LaTeX documents or before submission.
Critique academic figures for print quality, accessibility, legibility, visual encoding, and statistical presentation. Use when reviewing figures or preparing a manuscript for submission.
Toggle DOI, URL, eprint, and ISBN display in a biblatex bibliography. Use when the user asks to show or hide identifiers or make bibliography identifiers available as links.
Query and analyze scholarly literature using the OpenAlex API. Use for literature searches, finding papers by author or institution, citation analysis, and bibliometric queries.
| name | check-refs |
| user_invocable | true |
| description | Match references in a LaTeX paper against academic databases, flag entries that need review, and suggest missing DOIs or URLs. Use when checking citations or preparing a paper for submission. |
Match a LaTeX paper's references against academic databases with bibsleuth. Database matches support bibliographic verification but do not prove that a citation supports the manuscript's claim.
Use user-provided paths when available. Otherwise, identify the manuscript entrypoint from the project's build configuration and TeX structure, then resolve its bibliography declarations. Ask only if multiple plausible papers remain.
Run the database-only check by default:
uvx bibsleuth check <TEX_FILE> --bib <BIB_FILE> --no-llm
uvx supplies the tool without a separate installation step. Allow enough time for large bibliographies and use asynchronous execution when the harness supports it.
Read the generated bibsleuth-report.md. Prioritize unverified and error results, summarize suggested DOI or URL patches, and link the full report. Apply patches only when the user requested reference repair or approves the proposed edits, then check the diff for unintended bibliography changes.
For claim-level analysis, missing-citation suggestions, and contradiction searches, run the LLM mode only when the user requests it and accepts the additional model-provider exposure:
uvx bibsleuth check <TEX_FILE> --bib <BIB_FILE>
If the user explicitly requested full analysis at the outset, do not force a redundant --no-llm pass first. Present suspected miscitation and literature findings as items for review, not established errors.