Skip to main content
在 Manus 中运行任何 Skill
一键导入
ZenkakuHiragana
GitHub 创作者资料

ZenkakuHiragana

按仓库查看 1 个 GitHub 仓库中的 12 个已收集 skills,并展示近似职业覆盖。

已收集 skills
12
仓库
1
职业领域
2
更新
2026-06-01
职业覆盖
该创作者主要覆盖的职业大类。
仓库分布

Skills 分布在哪些仓库

按已收集 skill 数展示主要仓库,并显示它们在该创作者目录中的占比和职业覆盖。

仓库浏览

仓库与代表性 skills

#001
my-chezmoi-config
12 个 skills00更新于 2026-06-01
占该创作者 100%
code-review
软件质量保证分析师与测试员

Attach this capability when a task frame needs review of a specific diff or codebase surface for quality issues. It produces prioritized findings with severity, authority, evidence, impact, and next steps across correctness, design, tests, maintainability, security, performance, docs, and style. Do not use as the sole capability for implementing fixes, investigating observed behavior, or factual follow-up verification; attach investigation, public-research, or epistemic-audit as needed.

2026-06-01
epistemic-audit
软件开发工程师

Attach this capability when a task frame needs non-trivial claim control, source-class selection, requirement interpretation, source synthesis, review judgment, implementation premises, or reader-facing constraints. Load it before answering when a follow-up verifies a prior claim and the answer depends on both public docs and a required local source-of-truth class, or when that local source class is known but unchecked. It produces a control-plane ledger, not final prose, and does not replace investigation or public research.

2026-06-01
implementation
软件开发工程师

Attach this capability when a normalized requirements artifact or task contract identifies the requested repository change, target surfaces, invariants, acceptance criteria, verification method, and required checks, and files must be updated to satisfy it. It covers coherent code, documentation, configuration, prompt, or script changes. Do not use as the sole capability when required source classes, observed behavior, diagnostic evidence, or user decisions remain unresolved; attach investigation, public-research, requirements-clarification, or epistemic-audit first as needed.

2026-06-01
investigation
软件开发工程师

Attach this capability when repository-local behavior or locally available source-of-truth evidence must be inspected before a claim, fix, or implementation is safe. This includes local upstream checkouts, generated graphs, runtime artifacts, logs, traces, authoritative paths named by AGENTS.md, domain notes, or the user, and unresolved `repo_derivable` attributes. It produces confirmed local observations, source coverage, remaining unknowns, and the next action. Do not use as the sole capability for public-only fact finding or for concrete implementation work whose facts and checks are already resolved.

2026-06-01
public-research
软件开发工程师

Attach this capability when a task frame requires source-backed public facts, official guidance, standards, policies, APIs, upstream practices, evaluation methods, or unresolved `public_fact` attributes. It covers public evidence acquisition and citation. Do not use it as the primary or sole capability when AGENTS.md, domain notes, project rules, or the user name a local source-of-truth checkout, generated graph, runtime artifact, log, or authoritative path for the same behavior; attach `investigation` for that local evidence first, and add `epistemic-audit` when claim authority or source-class selection is non-trivial.

2026-06-01
refactoring
软件开发工程师

Attach this capability for behavior-preserving structural cleanup of existing code. It covers clearer structure, names, boundaries, and validation that behavior is preserved. Do not attach it as the sole capability for feature work, bug fixes, unresolved source evidence, or external research; attach requirements-clarification, investigation, public-research, implementation, or epistemic-audit as needed.

2026-06-01
requirements-clarification
软件开发工程师

Attach this capability as the default requirement-normalization step for ordinary implementation-shaped requests that are not yet execution-ready. It treats the user's instruction as a stated requirement, decomposes atomic requirements, records attribute status, field grounding, inferred candidates, rejected assumptions, and remaining source or capability obligations. Do not use it for purely factual questions, pure local investigation, or pure public research with no implementation intent. Expected result: a written requirements artifact plus a next capability set.

2026-06-01
task-planning
软件开发工程师

Attach this capability when a normalized requirements artifact or clear task contract is concrete enough to write a durable task file, but the work still needs sequencing across investigation, implementation, research, verification, or resume-safe execution. It records ordered work items, dependencies, relevant surfaces, source obligations, completion checks, and downstream capability needs under `.opencode/work/`. Do not use it when required requirement attributes or source classes are still unresolved; resolve those first with the appropriate capability.

2026-06-01
当前展示该仓库 Top 8 / 12 个已收集 skills。
已展示 1 / 1 个仓库
已展示全部仓库