菜单
Review a diff against a task's success criteria. Use when: a `task_assignment` for role `reviewer` lands; you need to lint, summarize a diff, or produce structured review comments.
用 Codex 或 Claude 帮你安装 复制这段 Prompt，粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里，让它检查 Skill 页面并帮你完成安装。
基于 SOC 职业分类
Validate and fact-check another agent's output against evidence and the task's success criteria. Use when: verifying a report, fact-checking claims, cross-checking research findings, confirming a result meets its criteria. Not for browser/E2E testing (see e2e-runner).
Procedure the Researcher agent follows to answer a question with web search + page fetch: plan queries, search, open the promising pages, cross-check, and return a source-cited synthesis. Use when a task needs current or external facts.
Example skill scaffold. Replace this with a real, project-specific procedural playbook. The description must clearly state WHEN to use the skill (trigger phrases and scope) so the model can match it to user intent. USE FOR: <list the situations this skill applies to>. DO NOT USE FOR: <list out-of-scope situations and point to the right skill>.
The Planner's operating procedure. Use when: turning a principal goal into a Plan; revising a plan after rejection; dispatching ratified tasks; supervising sub-agent results; deciding whether to convene the Council; finalizing a run.
Classify a proposed action's risk tier (T0–T4), apply the gate policy, and (if required) summarize the proposal into a human-reviewable approval request. Use whenever an agent is about to perform an action that touches anything outside its own scratch state.
Append a structured event to the run's provenance log. Every agent calls this for every meaningful state transition (plan drafted, task dispatched, action proposed/executed, approval decided, etc.) so the run is fully replayable and auditable.
| name | reviewer-runner |
| description | Review a diff against a task's success criteria. Use when: a `task_assignment` for role `reviewer` lands; you need to lint, summarize a diff, or produce structured review comments. |
| argument-hint | Path to the task_assignment message; the message payload should reference the diff path. |
task_assignment for role reviewer.successCriteria to review against.reviewer.agent.md.shared/approval-gate/SKILL.md and
shared/provenance/SKILL.md.assigneeRole === "reviewer" and the
inputs.diffPath points at an existing artifact.task_started.eslint, ruff, golangci-lint, etc.).
Capture output under runs/<runId>/artifacts/<task-id>/lint.log.successCriteria.runs/<runId>/artifacts/<task-id>/review.md with two sections:
file:line and the criterion it violates.comment:pr capability) if the diff is a real PR.
Otherwise the artifact is the deliverable.TaskResult:
success if Blocking is empty and lint is clean.partial if lint has warnings but no errors and no Blocking items.failure if any Blocking item or any lint error.task_result and message the Planner.🚧 Scaffold.