// This skill should be used when the user asks to "create a slash command", "add a command", "write a custom command", "define command arguments", "use command frontmatter", "organize commands", "create command with file references", "interactive command", "use AskUserQuestion in command", or needs guidance on slash command structure, YAML frontmatter fields, dynamic arguments, bash execution in commands, user interaction patterns, or command development best practices for Claude Code.
| name | Command Development |
| description | This skill should be used when the user asks to "create a slash command", "add a command", "write a custom command", "define command arguments", "use command frontmatter", "organize commands", "create command with file references", "interactive command", "use AskUserQuestion in command", or needs guidance on slash command structure, YAML frontmatter fields, dynamic arguments, bash execution in commands, user interaction patterns, or command development best practices for Claude Code. |
| version | 0.2.0 |
Slash commands are frequently-used prompts defined as Markdown files that Claude executes during interactive sessions. Understanding command structure, frontmatter options, and dynamic features enables creating powerful, reusable workflows.
Key concepts:
A slash command is a Markdown file containing a prompt that Claude executes when invoked. Commands provide:
Commands are written for agent consumption, not human consumption.
When a user invokes /command-name, the command content becomes Claude's instructions. Write commands as directives TO Claude about what to do, not as messages TO the user.
Correct approach (instructions for Claude):
Review this code for security vulnerabilities including:
- SQL injection
- XSS attacks
- Authentication issues
Provide specific line numbers and severity ratings.
Incorrect approach (messages to user):
This command will review your code for security issues.
You'll receive a report with vulnerability details.
The first example tells Claude what to do. The second tells the user what will happen but doesn't instruct Claude. Always use the first approach.
Project commands (shared with team):
.claude/commands//helpPersonal commands (available everywhere):
~/.claude/commands//helpPlugin commands (bundled with plugins):
plugin-name/commands//helpCommands are Markdown files with .md extension:
.claude/commands/
├── review.md # /review command
├── test.md # /test command
└── deploy.md # /deploy command
Simple command:
Review this code for security vulnerabilities including:
- SQL injection
- XSS attacks
- Authentication bypass
- Insecure data handling
No frontmatter needed for basic commands.
Add configuration using YAML frontmatter:
---
description: Review code for security issues
allowed-tools: Read, Grep, Bash(git:*)
model: sonnet
---
Review this code for security vulnerabilities...
Purpose: Brief description shown in /help
Type: String
Default: First line of command prompt
---
description: Review pull request for code quality
---
Best practice: Clear, actionable description (under 60 characters)
Purpose: Specify which tools command can use Type: String or Array Default: Inherits from conversation
---
allowed-tools: Read, Write, Edit, Bash(git:*)
---
Patterns:
Read, Write, Edit - Specific toolsBash(git:*) - Bash with git commands only* - All tools (rarely needed)Use when: Command requires specific tool access
Purpose: Specify model for command execution Type: String (sonnet, opus, haiku) Default: Inherits from conversation
---
model: haiku
---
Use cases:
haiku - Fast, simple commandssonnet - Standard workflowsopus - Complex analysisPurpose: Document expected arguments for autocomplete Type: String Default: None
---
argument-hint: [pr-number] [priority] [assignee]
---
Benefits:
Purpose: Prevent SlashCommand tool from programmatically calling command Type: Boolean Default: false
---
disable-model-invocation: true
---
Use when: Command should only be manually invoked
Capture all arguments as single string:
---
description: Fix issue by number
argument-hint: [issue-number]
---
Fix issue #$ARGUMENTS following our coding standards and best practices.
Usage:
> /fix-issue 123
> /fix-issue 456
Expands to:
Fix issue #123 following our coding standards...
Fix issue #456 following our coding standards...
Capture individual arguments with $1, $2, $3, etc.:
---
description: Review PR with priority and assignee
argument-hint: [pr-number] [priority] [assignee]
---
Review pull request #$1 with priority level $2.
After review, assign to $3 for follow-up.
Usage:
> /review-pr 123 high alice
Expands to:
Review pull request #123 with priority level high.
After review, assign to alice for follow-up.
Mix positional and remaining arguments:
Deploy $1 to $2 environment with options: $3
Usage:
> /deploy api staging --force --skip-tests
Expands to:
Deploy api to staging environment with options: --force --skip-tests
Include file contents in command:
---
description: Review specific file
argument-hint: [file-path]
---
Review @$1 for:
- Code quality
- Best practices
- Potential bugs
Usage:
> /review-file src/api/users.ts
Effect: Claude reads src/api/users.ts before processing command
Reference multiple files:
Compare @src/old-version.js with @src/new-version.js
Identify:
- Breaking changes
- New features
- Bug fixes
Reference known files without arguments:
Review @package.json and @tsconfig.json for consistency
Ensure:
- TypeScript version matches
- Dependencies are aligned
- Build configuration is correct
Commands can execute bash commands inline to dynamically gather context before Claude processes the command. This is useful for including repository state, environment information, or project-specific context.
When to use:
Implementation details:
For complete syntax, examples, and best practices, see references/plugin-features-reference.md section on bash execution. The reference includes the exact syntax and multiple working examples to avoid execution issues
Simple organization for small command sets:
.claude/commands/
├── build.md
├── test.md
├── deploy.md
├── review.md
└── docs.md
Use when: 5-15 commands, no clear categories
Organize commands in subdirectories:
.claude/commands/
├── ci/
│ ├── build.md # /build (project:ci)
│ ├── test.md # /test (project:ci)
│ └── lint.md # /lint (project:ci)
├── git/
│ ├── commit.md # /commit (project:git)
│ └── pr.md # /pr (project:git)
└── docs/
├── generate.md # /generate (project:docs)
└── publish.md # /publish (project:docs)
Benefits:
/helpUse when: 15+ commands, clear categories
/helpallowed-tools when neededargument-hint---
argument-hint: [pr-number]
---
$IF($1,
Review PR #$1,
Please provide a PR number. Usage: /review-pr [number]
)
Bash(git:*) not Bash(*)---
description: Deploy application to environment
argument-hint: [environment] [version]
---
<!--
Usage: /deploy [staging|production] [version]
Requires: AWS credentials configured
Example: /deploy staging v1.2.3
-->
Deploy application to $1 environment using version $2...
---
description: Review code changes
allowed-tools: Read, Bash(git:*)
---
Files changed: !`git diff --name-only`
Review each file for:
1. Code quality and style
2. Potential bugs or issues
3. Test coverage
4. Documentation needs
Provide specific feedback for each file.
---
description: Run tests for specific file
argument-hint: [test-file]
allowed-tools: Bash(npm:*)
---
Run tests: !`npm test $1`
Analyze results and suggest fixes for failures.
---
description: Generate documentation for file
argument-hint: [source-file]
---
Generate comprehensive documentation for @$1 including:
- Function/class descriptions
- Parameter documentation
- Return value descriptions
- Usage examples
- Edge cases and errors
---
description: Complete PR workflow
argument-hint: [pr-number]
allowed-tools: Bash(gh:*), Read
---
PR #$1 Workflow:
1. Fetch PR: !`gh pr view $1`
2. Review changes
3. Run checks
4. Approve or request changes
Command not appearing:
.md extension presentArguments not working:
$1, $2 syntax correctargument-hint matches usageBash execution failing:
allowed-tools includes BashFile references not working:
@ syntax correctPlugin commands have access to ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}, an environment variable that resolves to the plugin's absolute path.
Purpose:
Basic usage:
---
description: Analyze using plugin script
allowed-tools: Bash(node:*)
---
Run analysis: !`node ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/analyze.js $1`
Review results and report findings.
Common patterns:
# Execute plugin script
!`bash ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/script.sh`
# Load plugin configuration
@${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/config/settings.json
# Use plugin template
@${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/templates/report.md
# Access plugin resources
@${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/docs/reference.md
Why use it:
Plugin commands discovered automatically from commands/ directory:
plugin-name/
├── commands/
│ ├── foo.md # /foo (plugin:plugin-name)
│ ├── bar.md # /bar (plugin:plugin-name)
│ └── utils/
│ └── helper.md # /helper (plugin:plugin-name:utils)
└── plugin.json
Namespace benefits:
/help outputNaming conventions:
Configuration-based pattern:
---
description: Deploy using plugin configuration
argument-hint: [environment]
allowed-tools: Read, Bash(*)
---
Load configuration: @${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/config/$1-deploy.json
Deploy to $1 using configuration settings.
Monitor deployment and report status.
Template-based pattern:
---
description: Generate docs from template
argument-hint: [component]
---
Template: @${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/templates/docs.md
Generate documentation for $1 following template structure.
Multi-script pattern:
---
description: Complete build workflow
allowed-tools: Bash(*)
---
Build: !`bash ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/build.sh`
Test: !`bash ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/test.sh`
Package: !`bash ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/package.sh`
Review outputs and report workflow status.
See references/plugin-features-reference.md for detailed patterns.
Commands can integrate with other plugin components for powerful workflows.
Launch plugin agents for complex tasks:
---
description: Deep code review
argument-hint: [file-path]
---
Initiate comprehensive review of @$1 using the code-reviewer agent.
The agent will analyze:
- Code structure
- Security issues
- Performance
- Best practices
Agent uses plugin resources:
- ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/config/rules.json
- ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/checklists/review.md
Key points:
plugin/agents/ directoryLeverage plugin skills for specialized knowledge:
---
description: Document API with standards
argument-hint: [api-file]
---
Document API in @$1 following plugin standards.
Use the api-docs-standards skill to ensure:
- Complete endpoint documentation
- Consistent formatting
- Example quality
- Error documentation
Generate production-ready API docs.
Key points:
plugin/skills/ directoryDesign commands that work with plugin hooks:
See references/plugin-features-reference.md for examples of commands that coordinate with hooks
Combine agents, skills, and scripts:
---
description: Comprehensive review workflow
argument-hint: [file]
allowed-tools: Bash(node:*), Read
---
Target: @$1
Phase 1 - Static Analysis:
!`node ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/lint.js $1`
Phase 2 - Deep Review:
Launch code-reviewer agent for detailed analysis.
Phase 3 - Standards Check:
Use coding-standards skill for validation.
Phase 4 - Report:
Template: @${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/templates/review.md
Compile findings into report following template.
When to use:
Commands should validate inputs and resources before processing.
---
description: Deploy with validation
argument-hint: [environment]
---
Validate environment: !`echo "$1" | grep -E "^(dev|staging|prod)$" || echo "INVALID"`
If $1 is valid environment:
Deploy to $1
Otherwise:
Explain valid environments: dev, staging, prod
Show usage: /deploy [environment]
---
description: Process configuration
argument-hint: [config-file]
---
Check file exists: !`test -f $1 && echo "EXISTS" || echo "MISSING"`
If file exists:
Process configuration: @$1
Otherwise:
Explain where to place config file
Show expected format
Provide example configuration
---
description: Run plugin analyzer
allowed-tools: Bash(test:*)
---
Validate plugin setup:
- Script: !`test -x ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/bin/analyze && echo "✓" || echo "✗"`
- Config: !`test -f ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/config.json && echo "✓" || echo "✗"`
If all checks pass, run analysis.
Otherwise, report missing components.
---
description: Build with error handling
allowed-tools: Bash(*)
---
Execute build: !`bash ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/build.sh 2>&1 || echo "BUILD_FAILED"`
If build succeeded:
Report success and output location
If build failed:
Analyze error output
Suggest likely causes
Provide troubleshooting steps
Best practices:
For detailed frontmatter field specifications, see references/frontmatter-reference.md.
For plugin-specific features and patterns, see references/plugin-features-reference.md.
For command pattern examples, see examples/ directory.