detect-logical-groups

name	detect-logical-groups
description	Rules for detecting and grouping TIBCO integration artifacts into logical flow groups using a process-call chain strategy. Covers process-call chain rules, fallback grouping when no sources exist, and required output fields.

Skill: Detecting Flow Groups

Purpose: Authoritative rules for how an AI agent should group discovered TIBCO integration artifacts into logical flow groups. The agent MUST follow these rules exactly.

---

1. Grouping Strategy (Flow Reference Chains)

• HIGHEST PRIORITY: If multiple flows reference the SAME sub-process via process-call (directly or transitively), they MUST be in the SAME group — the shared sub-process is the unifying element.
• Call-workflow edges: The connectionGraph includes call-workflow edges when one flow calls another flow or sub-process via process-call. Flows linked by these edges (directly or transitively) MUST be in the SAME group. Example: If Flow-A calls sub-process-B and sub-process-B calls sub-process-C, all three belong in ONE group.
• Shared-connection edges: The connectionGraph includes shared-connection edges when multiple flows use the same global configuration (e.g., same http:listener-config, same db:config). Flows sharing configs SHOULD be in the same group unless they are clearly independent.
• Only create separate groups for flows that use DIFFERENT sub-processes with no transitive connection.
• Transitively connected artifacts belong in the SAME group.
• Name each group by business purpose (derived from flow names and HTTP listener paths).

---

2. Fallback Rules (When no HTTP listeners or schedulers exist)

Do NOT return empty groups. Use this fallback order:

1. Flow-root grouping — one group per CONNECTED flow cluster. Follow call-workflow edges to find clusters. Do NOT create one group per individual flow when they reference each other.
2. Trigger-capability grouping — flows with sources (http:listener, scheduler, jms:listener, file:listener, JMS/EMS listener) as entry points. receiveLocationCount includes all triggers.
3. Connected-component grouping — from graph edges (call-workflow, shared-connection) and any remaining connections.

Only leave artifacts in ungroupedArtifactIds if they are truly isolated with no meaningful edges or entry semantics.

For fallback groups, set entryPoint to flow/trigger/internal-entry (not receive-location).

---

3. Required Output Fields

Each group MUST have:

Field	Type	Description
id	string	Unique group ID (e.g. flow-1-order-processing)
name	string	Human-readable name by business purpose
description	string	What this flow does
category	string	e.g. message-flow, shared-infrastructure
artifactIds	string[]	MUST NOT be empty
entryPoint	object	Entry point (type, name, messageType)
exitPoints	array	Exit points (type, name, messageType)

---

4. Procedure

1. Call migration_detectFlowGroups to get the artifact connection graph and summaries.
2. If the connectionGraph has few or no call-workflow or shared-connection edges, the process-call data may be incomplete. In that case: a. Call migration_listArtifacts with category="custom-code" to find JARs and custom Java classes. b. Read flow source files (migration_readSourceFile) to find process-call targets and shared config references. c. Use the discovered call chains and shared configs to merge groups that should be together.
3. Determine logical flow groups using the process-call chain strategy above, incorporating both graph edges AND any call chains discovered in step 2.
4. Call migration_discovery_storeFlowGroups with the groups array, ungroupedArtifactIds, and explanation.

---

5. What NOT to Do

• Do NOT create empty artifactIds arrays.
• Do NOT split flows linked by process-call chains into separate groups.
• Do NOT skip source reading when the connectionGraph has missing call-chain edges — incomplete grouping causes downstream analysis failures.