一键导入
mw-policy-implication
// Use when drafting or strengthening the policy-implications section of a Management-World manuscript. Enforces layered (short / mid / long-term, micro / meso / macro) actionable recommendations.
// Use when drafting or strengthening the policy-implications section of a Management-World manuscript. Enforces layered (short / mid / long-term, micro / meso / macro) actionable recommendations.
Use when assembling the data-and-code replication package required by 《管理世界》 after conditional acceptance, drafting the README in Chinese, or auditing a deposit before editorial-office submission. Implements 《管理世界》"数据可获得性政策" (effective 2023, updated 2025), with explicit handling for CSMAR / Wind / 国泰安 等受限商业数据库 and Chinese government micro-data.
Use when deciding which mw-* sub-skill to invoke next, or when sequencing manuscript work from topic selection through rebuttal for 《管理世界》 (Management World). Routes — does not replace — the specialized skills.
Use when the empirical identification strategy is the bottleneck for a Management-World manuscript — quasi-experimental designs (DID, IV, RDD, DML, event study) with Chinese policy shocks. Stress-tests the design before drafting tables.
Use when drafting or revising the institutional-background section of a Management-World manuscript, when the China policy timeline is unclear, or when reviewers ask for stronger institutional context.
Use when drafting or revising the literature-review section for a Management-World manuscript, when the Chinese / English reference balance is off, or when canonical Chinese references are missing.
Use when designing or writing mechanism tests and heterogeneity analyses for a Management-World empirical manuscript. Required for nearly all MW empirical submissions.
| name | mw-policy-implication |
| description | Use when drafting or strengthening the policy-implications section of a Management-World manuscript. Enforces layered (short / mid / long-term, micro / meso / macro) actionable recommendations. |
《管理世界》编委的政策导向极强。即使是理论文章,编委也会期待"对治理 / 政策 / 实践有什么启示"。没有政策启示的实证文章命中率极低。
政策建议分两个维度分层:
至少写 3 条政策建议,分别覆盖不同的时间 × 层级组合。
第一,[短期 × 宏观]——基于本文发现,建议[具体部门]在[时间窗]内,[具体可执行动作]。
具体而言,可通过[路径 1] / [路径 2] 实现,预计效果为[本文实证结果]。
第二,[中期 × 中观]——……
第三,[长期 × 微观]——……
每条建议都必须:
【建议数】X 条
【时间层覆盖】短 / 中 / 长
【层级层覆盖】微 / 中 / 宏
【可执行性】高 / 中 / 低
【与本文证据挂钩度】高 / 中 / 低
【下一步】mw-submission