一键导入
skill-authoring-workflow
// Turn raw PM content into a compliant, publish-ready skill. Use when creating or updating a repo skill without breaking standards.
// Turn raw PM content into a compliant, publish-ready skill. Use when creating or updating a repo skill without breaking standards.
| name | skill-authoring-workflow |
| description | Turn raw PM content into a compliant, publish-ready skill. Use when creating or updating a repo skill without breaking standards. |
| intent | Create or update PM skills without chaos. This workflow turns rough notes, workshop content, or half-baked prompt dumps into compliant `skills/<skill-name>/SKILL.md` assets that actually pass validation and belong in this repo. |
| type | workflow |
| best_for | ["Creating a new repo skill from notes or source material","Updating an existing skill while keeping standards intact","Running the full authoring and validation workflow before commit"] |
| scenarios | ["Help me turn these workshop notes into a new PM skill","I need to update an existing skill without breaking the repo standards","What workflow should I use to author a new skill in this repo?"] |
Create or update PM skills without chaos. This workflow turns rough notes, workshop content, or half-baked prompt dumps into compliant skills/<skill-name>/SKILL.md assets that actually pass validation and belong in this repo.
Use it when you want to ship a new skill without "looks good to me" roulette.
Use repo-native tools and standards before inventing a custom process:
scripts/find-a-skill.shscripts/add-a-skill.shscripts/build-a-skill.shscripts/test-a-skill.shscripts/check-skill-metadata.pybuild-a-skill.sh): Best when you have an idea but not final prose.add-a-skill.sh): Best when you already have source content.A skill is done only when:
name, description, intent, type)name <= 64 chars, description <= 200 chars)When running this workflow as a guided conversation, use workshop-facilitation as the interaction protocol.
It defines:
Other (specify) when useful)This file defines the workflow sequence and domain-specific outputs. If there is a conflict, follow this file's workflow logic.
./scripts/find-a-skill.sh --keyword "<topic>"
If you have source material:
./scripts/add-a-skill.sh research/your-framework.md
If you want guided prompts:
./scripts/build-a-skill.sh
Manually review for:
Run strict checks before thinking about commit:
./scripts/test-a-skill.sh --skill <skill-name> --smoke
python3 scripts/check-skill-metadata.py skills/<skill-name>/SKILL.md
python3 scripts/check-skill-triggers.py skills/<skill-name>/SKILL.md --show-cases
If this is a new skill:
If targeting Claude custom skill upload:
./scripts/zip-a-skill.sh --skill <skill-name>
# or zip one category:
./scripts/zip-a-skill.sh --type component --output dist/skill-zips
# or use a curated starter preset:
./scripts/zip-a-skill.sh --preset core-pm --output dist/skill-zips
Input: research/pricing-workshop-notes.md
Goal: new interactive advisor
./scripts/add-a-skill.sh research/pricing-workshop-notes.md
./scripts/test-a-skill.sh --skill <new-skill-name> --smoke
python3 scripts/check-skill-metadata.py skills/<new-skill-name>/SKILL.md
Expected result:
"We wrote a cool skill, skipped validation, forgot README counts, and shipped anyway."
Result:
workflow when the task is really a component template.intent become a substitute for a weak trigger description.README.mdAGENTS.mdCLAUDE.mddocs/Building PM Skills.mddocs/Add-a-Skill Utility Guide.mdscripts/add-a-skill.shscripts/build-a-skill.shscripts/find-a-skill.shscripts/test-a-skill.shscripts/check-skill-metadata.pyscripts/check-skill-triggers.pyscripts/zip-a-skill.shIdentify which organic growth path to pursue — new segments, geographies, channels, or products. Use when diagnosing where a growth constraint lives and which McKinsey growth level to act on next.
Design a new PM skill through guided conversation. Use when you have raw content or an idea and want to shape it into a compliant skill.
Structure a spoken PM product-sense answer with assumptions, segmentation, pain-point prioritization, and MVP tradeoffs. Use when practicing design, improve, or build-next interview questions.
Evaluate acquisition channels using unit economics, customer quality, and scalability. Use when deciding whether to scale, test, or kill a growth channel.
Assess whether your product work is AI-first or AI-shaped. Use when evaluating AI maturity and choosing the next team capability to build.
Understand the PM-to-Director transition through altitude and horizon thinking. Use when diagnosing scope, time-horizon, or leadership-level gaps.