// Analyze historical failure rates for Known Build Error issues by mining the edit history of issue bodies. Use when asked "when did this last fail", "failure history", "failure rate", "is this issue still active", "flaky test history", "known issue activity", or "most active known issues".
| name | known-issue-history |
| description | Analyze historical failure rates for Known Build Error issues by mining the edit history of issue bodies. Use when asked "when did this last fail", "failure history", "failure rate", "is this issue still active", "flaky test history", "known issue activity", or "most active known issues". |
Reconstruct failure timelines for "Known Build Error" issues by analyzing the edit history of the issue body's hit count table. The build-analysis bot periodically edits these issues to update rolling hit counts (24h/7d/1mo) — this skill mines those edits to recover the full failure history.
Use this skill when:
./scripts/Get-KnownIssueHistory.ps1 -IssueNumber <N> -Repository <owner/repo>-Since <date> if the user only wants recent failures, or -Json for structured output./scripts/Get-KnownIssueHistory.ps1 -ListActive -Repository <owner/repo>-MaxIssues <N> to limit scope (default 50, max 100)# Analyze a single known issue
./scripts/Get-KnownIssueHistory.ps1 -IssueNumber 100088
# Only show recent failures
./scripts/Get-KnownIssueHistory.ps1 -IssueNumber 100088 -Since 2025-01-01
# JSON output for programmatic use
./scripts/Get-KnownIssueHistory.ps1 -IssueNumber 100088 -Json
# Scan all open Known Build Error issues, ranked by activity
./scripts/Get-KnownIssueHistory.ps1 -ListActive
# Different repository
./scripts/Get-KnownIssueHistory.ps1 -IssueNumber 12345 -Repository dotnet/aspnetcore
| Parameter | Description |
|---|---|
-IssueNumber | Known Build Error issue number to analyze |
-Repository | Target repo in owner/repo format (default: dotnet/runtime) |
-ListActive | Scan all open Known Build Error issues and rank by recent activity |
-MaxIssues | Max issues to scan in ListActive mode (default: 50) |
-Since | Only show failures after this date (ISO 8601, e.g. 2025-01-01) |
-Json | Output structured JSON ([KNOWN_ISSUE_HISTORY] block) instead of table |
-IssueNumber)Queries the GitHub GraphQL userContentEdits API for the issue, parses each edit's hit count table, and detects failure events by tracking when the 24-hour count transitions from 0 to a positive value.
Output includes:
-ListActive)Scans all open issues with the "Known Build Error" label in the repository and analyzes each one's edit history. Outputs a ranked table sorted by most recent failure.
Use this to find:
| Marker | Meaning |
|---|---|
<-- NEW FAILURE | 24h count went from 0 to N — a build just matched this known issue |
<-- ADDITIONAL FAILURE | 24h count increased — another build matched within 24 hours |
(cleared) | All counts returned to 0 — no recent matches |
Consecutive failure events are grouped into periods. A period starts when 24h goes from 0→N and ends when all counts return to 0.
| Days Since Last Failure | Status | Action |
|---|---|---|
| 0-7 | Actively failing | Needs investigation |
| 7-30 | Recently active | Monitor |
| 30-90 | Dormant | Consider closing |
| 90+ | Likely fixed | Recommend closing |
When posting results to an issue or PR comment, always include a link back to this skill so readers know where the analysis came from:
Analysis generated by [known-issue-history](https://github.com/dotnet/arcade-skills/tree/main/plugins/dotnet-dnceng/skills/known-issue-history)
The build-analysis bot edits Known Build Error issue bodies whenever hit counts change. GitHub stores the revision history via the GraphQL userContentEdits API. Each edit includes a diff showing what changed in the issue body. The script parses hit-count table rows from these diffs to reconstruct snapshots:
|24-Hour Hit Count|7-Day Hit Count|1-Month Count|
|---|---|---|
|0|0|0|
The script extracts these snapshots chronologically and detects state transitions to reconstruct when failures actually occurred — recovering historical data that the rolling windows would otherwise hide.
Analyze VMR codeflow health using maestro MCP tools and GitHub MCP tools. USE FOR: investigating stale codeflow PRs, checking if fixes have flowed through the VMR pipeline, debugging dependency update issues, checking overall flow status for a repo, diagnosing why backflow PRs are missing or blocked, subscription health, build freshness, URLs containing dotnet-maestro or "Source code updates from dotnet/dotnet". DO NOT USE FOR: CI build failures (use ci-analysis skill), code review (use code-review skill), general PR investigation without codeflow context, tracing whether a specific commit/PR has reached another repo (use flow-tracing skill). INVOKES: maestro and GitHub MCP tools, flow-health.cs script.
Trace dependency flow across .NET repos through the VMR pipeline. USE FOR: checking if a PR/commit from repo A has reached repo B, finding what runtime SHA is in an SDK build, tracing dependency versions through the VMR, checking if a commit is included in an SDK build, decoding SDK version strings, "has my fix reached runtime", "did roslyn#80873 flow to runtime", "what SHA is in SDK version X", cross-repo dependency tracing, mapping SDK versions to VMR commits. DO NOT USE FOR: codeflow PR health or staleness (use flow-analysis skill), CI build failures (use ci-analysis skill). INVOKES: maestro and GitHub MCP tools, Get-SdkVersionTrace.ps1 script.
Analyze CI build and test status from Azure DevOps and Helix for dotnet repository PRs. Use when checking CI status, investigating failures, determining if a PR is ready to merge, or given URLs containing dev.azure.com or helix.dot.net. Also use when asked "why is CI red", "test failures", "retry CI", "rerun tests", "is CI green", "build failed", "checks failing", or "flaky tests". DO NOT USE FOR: investigating stale codeflow PRs or dependency update health, tracing whether a commit has flowed from one repo to another, reviewing code changes for correctness or style.
Investigate BinSkim SDL findings from official pipelines — understand Guardian filtering, compare raw vs merged SARIF, decode portal results, and determine fix ownership. Use when asked about SDL scan results, portal findings, Guardian filtering, rule meanings, or discrepancies between local and official results. Also use when asked "why does the portal show X", "what's filtered", "explain Guardian", "investigate SDL findings", "portal BA2008", "binskim failures in pipeline", or "what rules are required". DO NOT USE FOR: running BinSkim locally (use binskim-scan), source code analysis (use CodeQL), or credential scanning (use CredScan).
Run BinSkim binary security analysis locally against a dotnet repository. Use when asked to scan binaries, check BinSkim compliance, verify a fix for a rule violation, or run a local SDL scan. Also use when asked "run binskim", "binary security scan", "scan binaries", "check binskim", "verify my fix", "repro BA2008 locally", or "verify BA2008 fix". DO NOT USE FOR: investigating official pipeline results or portal findings (use binskim-analysis), source code analysis (use CodeQL), credential scanning (use CredScan), or general build/test failures (use ci-analysis).
Deep-dive investigation of Helix test failures starting from AzDO build legs. USE FOR: investigating recurring Helix test failures, downloading and analyzing Helix console logs, comparing passing vs failing runs, identifying machine-specific issues, XHarness timeout analysis, Android emulator DEVICE_NOT_FOUND errors, bulk failure aggregation across legs, "why does this test fail on some machines", "top 5 failing tests in the last 2 days", "download helix logs for build X", "compare passing and failing helix runs", "what are the most common failures". DO NOT USE FOR: high-level CI status checks (use ci-analysis), codeflow PRs (use flow-analysis). INVOKES: Helix and AzDO MCP tools, curl, gh CLI.