troubleshooting-docs

name	troubleshooting-docs
description	Captures solved problems as categorized documentation with YAML frontmatter for fast lookup. Use when user confirms solution with phrases like 'that worked', 'it's fixed', 'working now', or via /doc-fix command.
allowed-tools	["Read","Write","Bash","Grep"]
preconditions	["Problem has been solved (not in-progress)","Solution has been verified working"]

troubleshooting-docs Skill

Purpose: Automatically document solved problems to build searchable institutional knowledge with category-based organization (enum-validated problem types).

Overview

This skill captures problem solutions immediately after confirmation, creating structured documentation that serves as a searchable knowledge base for future sessions.

Organization: Single-file architecture - each problem documented as one markdown file in its symptom category directory (e.g., troubleshooting/build-failures/cmake-version-mismatch.md).

---

<critical_sequence name="documentation-capture" enforce_order="strict">

7-Step Process

### Step 1: Detect Confirmation

Auto-invoke after phrases:

• "that worked"
• "it's fixed"
• "working now"
• "problem solved"
• "that did it"

OR manual: /doc-fix command

Document when:

• Multiple investigation attempts needed
• Non-obvious solution that future sessions would benefit from
• Tricky debugging or root cause analysis

Skip when:

• Single-attempt fixes (typos, syntax errors, obvious mistakes)

### Step 2: Gather Context

Extract from conversation: plugin name, symptom (exact error messages), stage (0-6 or post-implementation), solution (code/config changes), investigation attempts, root cause, JUCE version, OS version, file/line references.

BLOCKING REQUIREMENT: If critical context is missing (plugin name, exact error, stage, or resolution steps), ask user and WAIT for response before proceeding to Step 3.

### Step 3: Check Existing Docs (Skip if unique first-time issue)

Search target category directory first (based on problem_type), then expand to all categories if no matches:

grep -r "exact error phrase" troubleshooting/[category]/
# If no match, expand: grep -r "exact error phrase" troubleshooting/

IF similar issue found:

THEN present decision options:

Found similar issue: troubleshooting/[path]

What's next?
1. Create new doc with cross-reference (recommended)
2. Update existing doc (only if same root cause)
3. Other

Choose (1-3): _

WAIT for user response, then execute chosen action.

ELSE (no similar issue found):

Proceed directly to Step 4 (no user interaction needed).

### Step 4: Generate Filename

Format: [sanitized-symptom]-[plugin]-[YYYYMMDD].md

Examples:

• missing-juce-dsp-module-DelayPlugin-20251110.md
• parameter-not-saving-state-ReverbPlugin-20251110.md
• webview-crash-on-resize-TapeAgePlugin-20251110.md

### Step 5: Validate YAML Schema

CRITICAL: All docs require validated YAML frontmatter with enum validation.

<validation_gate name="yaml-schema" blocking="true">

Validate against schema: Classify the problem against enum values defined in references/yaml-schema.md. Ensure all required fields present and match allowed values exactly.

BLOCK if validation fails: Load schema.yaml to show specific allowed enum values. Present errors and WAIT for corrected values.

GATE ENFORCEMENT: Do NOT proceed to Step 6 until YAML frontmatter passes all validation rules.

</validation_gate>

### Step 6: Create Documentation

Category mapping from problem_type: See references/yaml-schema.md for problem_type to directory mapping.

Read assets/resolution-template.md and populate with Step 2 context in a single operation:

PROBLEM_TYPE="[from validated YAML]"
CATEGORY="[mapped from problem_type]"
FILENAME="[generated-filename].md"
DOC_PATH="troubleshooting/${CATEGORY}/${FILENAME}"

mkdir -p "troubleshooting/${CATEGORY}"
# Write documentation with Step 2 context + validated YAML frontmatter

### Step 7: Cross-Reference & Pattern Detection

Step 7a: Cross-Reference (REQUIRED if similar issues found in Step 3)

If similar issues were found in Step 3, add bidirectional cross-references:

Update existing doc:

# Add Related Issues link to similar doc
echo "- See also: [$FILENAME]($REAL_FILE)" >> [similar-doc.md]

Update new doc: Cross-reference already included from Step 6.

Update patterns if 3+ similar issues:

# Add to troubleshooting/patterns/common-solutions.md
cat >> troubleshooting/patterns/common-solutions.md << 'EOF'

## [Pattern Name]

**Common symptom:** [Description]
**Root cause:** [Technical explanation]
**Solution pattern:** [General approach]

**Examples:**
- [Link to doc 1]
- [Link to doc 2]
- [Link to doc 3]
EOF

If no similar issues found in Step 3, skip to Step 7b.

Step 7b: Critical Pattern Detection (OPTIONAL - System Suggestion)

If automatic indicators suggest this might be a critical pattern:

• Severity: critical in YAML
• Affects multiple plugins OR foundational stage (Stage 1 or 3)
• Non-obvious solution

Then add suggestion in decision menu (Step 8):

💡 This might be worth adding to Required Reading (Option 2)

User decides via decision menu - NEVER auto-promote to Required Reading.

Template for Required Reading addition:

When user selects Option 2, use template from assets/critical-pattern-template.md. Number sequentially based on existing patterns in troubleshooting/patterns/juce8-critical-patterns.md.

</critical_sequence>

---

<decision_gate name="post-documentation" wait_for_user="true">

Decision Menu After Capture

After successful documentation, present options and WAIT for user response:

✓ Solution documented

File created:
- troubleshooting/[category]/[filename].md

What's next?
1. Continue workflow (recommended)
2. Add to Required Reading - Promote to critical patterns (juce8-critical-patterns.md)
3. Link related issues - Connect to similar problems
4. Update common patterns - Add to pattern library
5. View documentation - See what was captured
6. Other

Handle responses:

Option 1: Continue workflow

• Return to calling skill/workflow
• Documentation is complete

Option 2: Add to Required Reading ⭐ PRIMARY PATH FOR CRITICAL PATTERNS

User selects this when:

• System made this mistake multiple times across different plugins
• Solution is non-obvious but must be followed every time
• Foundational requirement (CMake, JUCE API, threading, etc.)

Action:

1. Extract pattern from the documentation
2. Format as ❌ WRONG vs ✅ CORRECT with code examples
3. Add to troubleshooting/patterns/juce8-critical-patterns.md
4. Add cross-reference back to this doc
5. Confirm: "✓ Added to Required Reading. All subagents will see this pattern before code generation."

Note: For direct addition without full documentation workflow, users can use /add-critical-pattern command.

Option 3: Link related issues

• Prompt: "Which doc to link? (provide filename or describe)"
• Search troubleshooting/ for the doc
• Add cross-reference to both docs
• Confirm: "✓ Cross-reference added"

Option 4: Update common patterns

• Check if 3+ similar issues exist
• If yes: Add pattern to troubleshooting/patterns/common-solutions.md
• If no: "Need 3+ similar issues to establish pattern (currently N)"

Option 5: View documentation

• Display the created documentation
• Present decision menu again

Option 6: Other

• Ask what they'd like to do

</decision_gate>

---

<integration_protocol>

Integration Points

Invoked by:

• deep-research skill (after solution found)
• plugin-improve skill (after fix validated)
• /doc-fix command (manual user invocation)

Invokes:

• None (terminal skill - does not delegate to other skills)

Handoff expectations: All context needed for documentation should be present in conversation history before invocation.

</integration_protocol>

---

<success_criteria>

Success Criteria

Documentation is successful when ALL of the following are true:

• ✅ YAML frontmatter validated (all required fields, correct formats)
• ✅ File created in troubleshooting/[category]/[filename].md
• ✅ Enum values match schema.yaml exactly
• ✅ Code examples included in solution section
• ✅ Cross-references added if related issues found
• ✅ User presented with decision menu and action confirmed

</success_criteria>

---

Example Walkthrough

See references/example-walkthrough.md for decision points and edge cases.