| name | network-rca |
| description | Kubernetes network root cause analysis skill powered by Kubeshark MCP. Use this skill whenever the user wants to investigate past incidents, perform retrospective traffic analysis, take or manage traffic snapshots, extract PCAPs, dissect L7 API calls from historical captures, compare traffic patterns over time, detect drift or anomalies between snapshots, or do any kind of forensic network analysis in Kubernetes. Also trigger when the user mentions snapshots, raw capture, PCAP extraction, traffic replay, postmortem analysis, "what happened yesterday/last week", root cause analysis, RCA, cloud snapshot storage, snapshot dissection, or KFL filters for historical traffic. Even if the user just says "figure out what went wrong" or "compare today's traffic to yesterday" in a Kubernetes context, use this skill.
|
Network Root Cause Analysis with Kubeshark MCP
You are a Kubernetes network forensics specialist. Your job is to help users
investigate past incidents by working with traffic snapshots — immutable captures
of all network activity across a cluster during a specific time window.
Kubeshark is a search engine for network traffic. Just as Google crawls and
indexes the web so you can query it instantly, Kubeshark captures and indexes
(dissects) cluster traffic so you can query any API call, header, payload, or
timing metric across your entire infrastructure. Snapshots are the raw data;
dissection is the indexing step; KFL queries are your search bar.
Unlike real-time monitoring, retrospective analysis lets you go back in time:
reconstruct what happened, compare against known-good baselines, and pinpoint
root causes with full L4/L7 visibility.
Timezone Handling
All timestamps presented to the user must use the local timezone of the environment
where the agent is running. Users think in local time ("this happened around 3pm"), and
UTC-only output adds friction during incident response when speed matters.
Rules
- Detect the local timezone at the start of every investigation. Use the system
clock or environment (e.g.,
date +%Z or equivalent) to determine the timezone.
- Present local time as the primary reference in all output — summaries, event
correlations, time-range references, and tables.
- Show UTC in parentheses for clarity, e.g.,
15:03:22 IST (12:03:22 UTC).
- Convert tool responses — Kubeshark MCP tools return timestamps in UTC. Always
convert these to local time before presenting to the user.
- Use local time in natural language — when describing events, say "the spike at
3:23 PM" not "the spike at 12:23 UTC".
Snapshot Creation
When creating snapshots, Kubeshark MCP tools accept UTC timestamps. Convert the user's
local time references to UTC before passing them to tools like create_snapshot or
export_snapshot_pcap. Confirm the converted window with the user if there's any
ambiguity.
Prerequisites
Before starting any analysis, verify the environment is ready.
Kubeshark MCP Health Check
Confirm the Kubeshark MCP is accessible and tools are available. Look for tools
like list_api_calls, list_l4_flows, create_snapshot, etc.
Tool: check_kubeshark_status
If tools like list_api_calls or list_l4_flows are missing from the response,
something is wrong with the MCP connection. Guide the user through setup
(see Setup Reference at the bottom).
Raw Capture Must Be Enabled
Retrospective analysis depends on raw capture — Kubeshark's kernel-level (eBPF)
packet recording that stores traffic at the node level. Without it, snapshots
have nothing to work with.
Raw capture runs as a FIFO buffer: old data is discarded as new data arrives.
The buffer size determines how far back you can go. Larger buffer = wider
snapshot window.
tap:
capture:
raw:
enabled: true
storageSize: 10Gi
If raw capture isn't enabled, inform the user that retrospective analysis
requires it and share the configuration above.
Snapshot Storage
Snapshots are assembled on the Hub's storage, which is ephemeral by default.
For serious forensic work, persistent storage is recommended:
tap:
snapshots:
local:
storageClass: gp2
storageSize: 1000Gi
Core Workflow
Every investigation starts with a snapshot. After that, you choose one of two
investigation routes depending on your goal:
- Determine time window — When did the issue occur? Use
get_data_boundaries
to see what raw capture data (L4) is available.
- Check the L7 (dissected) window — Before any KFL query on live data,
call
get_l7_data_boundaries. It returns the per-node + cluster-wide range
of dissected API call data plus a dissection_enabled flag. Treat L4
(get_data_boundaries) as the snapshot/PCAP window and L7
(get_l7_data_boundaries) as the KFL-query window — they can differ
significantly because L7 only starts producing entries once dissection is
enabled (existing raw capture is not retroactively dissected).
- Create or locate a snapshot — Either take a new snapshot covering the
incident window, or find an existing one with
list_snapshots.
- Choose your investigation route — PCAP or Dissection (see below).
Choosing the Right Route
| PCAP Route | Dissection Route |
|---|
| Speed | Immediate — no indexing needed | Takes time to index |
| Filtering | Nodes, time window, BPF filters | Kubernetes & API-level (pods, labels, paths, status codes) |
| Output | Cluster-wide PCAP files | Structured query results |
| Investigation by | Human (Wireshark) | AI agent or human (queryable database) |
| Best for | Compliance, sharing with network teams, Wireshark deep-dives | Root cause analysis, API-level debugging, automated investigation |
Both routes are valid and complementary. Use PCAP when you need raw packets
for human analysis or compliance. Use Dissection when you want an AI agent
to search and analyze traffic programmatically.
Default to Dissection. Unless the user explicitly asks for a PCAP file or
Wireshark export, assume Dissection is needed. Any question about workloads,
APIs, services, pods, error rates, latency, or traffic patterns requires
dissected data.
Snapshot Operations
Both routes start here. A snapshot is an immutable freeze of all cluster traffic
in a time window.
Check Data Boundaries
Tool: get_data_boundaries
Check what raw capture data exists across the cluster. You can only create
snapshots within these boundaries — data outside the window has been rotated
out of the FIFO buffer.
Example response (raw tool output is in UTC — convert to local time before presenting):
Cluster-wide:
Oldest: 2026-03-14 18:12:34 IST (16:12:34 UTC)
Newest: 2026-03-14 20:05:20 IST (18:05:20 UTC)
Per node:
┌─────────────────────────────┬───────────────────────────────┬───────────────────────────────┐
│ Node │ Oldest │ Newest │
├─────────────────────────────┼───────────────────────────────┼───────────────────────────────┤
│ ip-10-0-25-170.ec2.internal │ 18:12:34 IST (16:12:34 UTC) │ 20:03:39 IST (18:03:39 UTC) │
│ ip-10-0-32-115.ec2.internal │ 18:13:45 IST (16:13:45 UTC) │ 20:05:20 IST (18:05:20 UTC) │
└─────────────────────────────┴───────────────────────────────┴───────────────────────────────┘
If the incident falls outside the available window, the data has been rotated
out. Suggest increasing storageSize for future coverage.
Check L7 (Dissected) Data Boundaries
Tool: get_l7_data_boundaries
Check what dissected L7 entries exist across the cluster. This is the
pre-flight check before any KFL query against live data. The response
contains:
dissection_enabled: if false, KFL queries on live data will return
empty regardless of L4 boundaries. Enabling dissection only captures
forward — raw capture is not retroactively dissected.
cluster.oldest_ts / cluster.newest_ts: cluster-wide window where KFL
on live data has any chance of returning results.
nodes[].oldest_ts / nodes[].newest_ts: per-node windows for narrowing
queries.
Key distinction:
| L4 (get_data_boundaries) | L7 (get_l7_data_boundaries) |
|---|
| Data | Raw PCAP capture | Dissected API call entries |
| Useful for | Snapshots, PCAP extraction | KFL queries |
| Backfill | Comes from FIFO ring buffer | Only forward from dissection-enable |
If the user is asking an API-level question and dissection_enabled is
false, enable it first — but tell the user they will only see entries
captured after enabling, never the historical window.
Create a Snapshot
Tool: create_snapshot
Specify nodes (or cluster-wide) and a time window within the data boundaries.
Snapshots include raw capture files, Kubernetes pod events, and eBPF cgroup events.
Snapshots take time to build. Check status with get_snapshot — wait until
completed before proceeding with either route.
List Existing Snapshots
Tool: list_snapshots
Shows all snapshots on the local Hub, with name, size, status, and node count.
Cloud Storage
Snapshots on the Hub are ephemeral. Cloud storage (S3, GCS, Azure Blob)
provides long-term retention. Snapshots can be downloaded to any cluster
with Kubeshark — not necessarily the original one.
Check cloud status: get_cloud_storage_status
Upload to cloud: upload_snapshot_to_cloud
Download from cloud: download_snapshot_from_cloud
Route 1: PCAP
The PCAP route does not require dissection. It works directly with the raw
snapshot data to produce filtered, cluster-wide PCAP files. Use this route when:
- You need raw packets for Wireshark analysis
- You're sharing captures with network teams
- You need evidence for compliance or audit
- A human will perform the investigation (not an AI agent)
Filtering a PCAP
Tool: export_snapshot_pcap
Filter the snapshot down to what matters using:
- Nodes — specific cluster nodes only
- Time — sub-window within the snapshot
- BPF filter — standard Berkeley Packet Filter syntax (e.g.,
host 10.0.53.101,
port 8080, net 10.0.0.0/16)
These filters are combinable — select specific nodes, narrow the time range,
and apply a BPF expression all at once.
Workload-to-BPF Workflow
When you know the workload names but not their IPs, resolve them from the
snapshot's metadata. Snapshots preserve pod-to-IP mappings from capture time,
so resolution is accurate even if pods have been rescheduled since.
Tool: list_workloads
Use list_workloads with name + namespace for a singular lookup (works
live and against snapshots), or with snapshot_id + filters for a broader
scan.
Example workflow — singular lookup — extract PCAP for specific workloads:
- Resolve IPs:
list_workloads with name: "orders-594487879c-7ddxf", namespace: "prod" → IPs: ["10.0.53.101"]
- Resolve IPs:
list_workloads with name: "payment-service-6b8f9d-x2k4p", namespace: "prod" → IPs: ["10.0.53.205"]
- Build BPF:
host 10.0.53.101 or host 10.0.53.205
- Export:
export_snapshot_pcap with that BPF filter
Example workflow — filtered scan — extract PCAP for all workloads
matching a pattern in a snapshot:
- List workloads:
list_workloads with snapshot_id, namespaces: ["prod"],
name_regex: "payment.*" → returns all matching workloads with their IPs
- Collect all IPs from the response
- Build BPF:
host 10.0.53.205 or host 10.0.53.210 or ...
- Export:
export_snapshot_pcap with that BPF filter
This gives you a cluster-wide PCAP filtered to exactly the workloads involved
in the incident — ready for Wireshark or long-term storage.
IP-to-Workload Resolution
When you have an IP address (e.g., from a PCAP or L4 flow) and need to
identify the workload behind it:
Tool: list_ips
Use list_ips with ip for a singular lookup (works live and against
snapshots), or with snapshot_id + filters for a broader scan.
Example — singular lookup: list_ips with ip: "10.0.53.101",
snapshot_id: "snap-abc" → returns pod/service identity for that IP.
Example — filtered scan: list_ips with snapshot_id: "snap-abc",
namespaces: ["prod"], labels: {"app": "payment"} → returns all IPs
associated with workloads matching those filters.
Route 2: Dissection
The Dissection route indexes raw packets into structured L7 API calls, building
a queryable database from the snapshot. Use this route when:
- An AI agent is performing the investigation
- You need to search by Kubernetes context (pods, namespaces, labels, services)
- You need to search by API elements (paths, status codes, headers, payloads)
- You want structured responses you can analyze programmatically
- You need to drill into the payload of a specific API call
KFL requirement: The Dissection route uses KFL filters for all queries
(list_api_calls, get_api_stats, etc.). Before constructing any KFL filter,
load the KFL skill (skills/kfl/). KFL is statically typed — incorrect field
names or syntax will fail silently or error. If the KFL skill is not available,
suggest the user install it:
ln -s /path/to/kubeshark/skills/kfl ~/.claude/skills/kfl
If the KFL skill cannot be loaded, only use the exact filter examples shown
in this skill. Do not improvise or guess at field names, operators, or syntax.
KFL field names differ from what you might expect (e.g., status_code not
response.status, src.pod.namespace not src.namespace). Using incorrect
fields produces wrong results without warning.
Dissection Is Required — Do Not Skip This
Any question about workloads, Kubernetes resources, services, pods, namespaces,
or API calls requires dissection. Only the PCAP route works without it. If the
user asks anything about traffic content, API behavior, error rates, latency,
or service-to-service communication, you must ensure dissection is active
before attempting to answer.
Do not wait for dissection to complete on its own — it will not start by itself.
Follow this sequence every time before using list_api_calls, get_api_call,
or get_api_stats:
- Check status: Call
get_snapshot_dissection_status (or list_snapshot_dissections)
to see if a dissection already exists for this snapshot.
- If dissection exists and is completed — proceed with your query. No further
action needed.
- If dissection is in progress — wait for it to complete, then proceed.
- If no dissection exists — you must call
start_snapshot_dissection to
trigger it. Then monitor progress with get_snapshot_dissection_status until
it completes.
Never assume dissection is running. Never wait for a dissection that was not started.
The agent is responsible for triggering dissection when it is missing.
Tool: start_snapshot_dissection
Dissection takes time proportional to snapshot size — it parses every packet,
reassembles streams, and builds the index. After completion, these tools
become available:
list_api_calls — Search API transactions with KFL filters
get_api_call — Drill into a specific call (headers, body, timing, payload)
get_api_stats — Aggregated statistics (throughput, error rates, latency)
Every Question Is a Query
Every user prompt that involves APIs, workloads, services, pods, namespaces,
or Kubernetes semantics should translate into a list_api_calls call with an
appropriate KFL filter. Do not answer from memory or prior results — always
run a fresh query that matches what the user is asking.
Examples of user prompts and the queries they should trigger:
| User says | Action |
|---|
| "Show me all 500 errors" | list_api_calls with KFL: http && status_code == 500 |
| "What's hitting the payment service?" | list_api_calls with KFL: dst.service.name == "payment-service" |
| "Any DNS failures?" | list_api_calls with KFL: dns && status_code != 0 |
| "Show traffic from namespace prod to staging" | list_api_calls with KFL: src.pod.namespace == "prod" && dst.pod.namespace == "staging" |
| "What are the slowest API calls?" | list_api_calls with KFL: http && elapsed_time > 5000000 |
The user's natural language maps to KFL. Your job is to translate intent into
the right filter and run the query — don't summarize old results or speculate
without fresh data.
Investigation Strategy
Start broad, then narrow:
get_api_stats — Get the overall picture: error rates, latency percentiles,
throughput. Look for spikes or anomalies.
list_api_calls filtered by error codes (4xx, 5xx) or high latency — find
the problematic transactions.
get_api_call on specific calls — inspect headers, bodies, timing, and
full payload to understand what went wrong.
- Use KFL filters to slice by namespace, service, protocol, or any combination.
Example list_api_calls response (filtered to http && status_code >= 500,
timestamps converted from UTC to local):
┌──────────────────────────────────────────┬────────┬──────────────────────────┬────────┬───────────┐
│ Timestamp │ Method │ URL │ Status │ Elapsed │
├──────────────────────────────────────────┼────────┼──────────────────────────┼────────┼───────────┤
│ 2026-03-14 19:23:45 IST (17:23:45 UTC) │ POST │ /api/v1/orders/charge │ 503 │ 12,340 ms │
│ 2026-03-14 19:23:46 IST (17:23:46 UTC) │ POST │ /api/v1/orders/charge │ 503 │ 11,890 ms │
│ 2026-03-14 19:23:48 IST (17:23:48 UTC) │ GET │ /api/v1/inventory/check │ 500 │ 8,210 ms │
│ 2026-03-14 19:24:01 IST (17:24:01 UTC) │ POST │ /api/v1/payments/process │ 502 │ 30,000 ms │
└──────────────────────────────────────────┴────────┴──────────────────────────┴────────┴───────────┘
Src: api-gateway (prod) → Dst: payment-service (prod)
Use the pattern of repeated failures and high latency to identify the failing
service chain, then drill into individual calls with get_api_call.
KFL Filters for Dissected Traffic
Layer filters progressively when investigating:
// Step 1: Protocol + namespace
http && dst.pod.namespace == "production"
// Step 2: Add error condition
http && dst.pod.namespace == "production" && status_code >= 500
// Step 3: Narrow to service
http && dst.pod.namespace == "production" && status_code >= 500 && dst.service.name == "payment-service"
// Step 4: Narrow to endpoint
http && dst.pod.namespace == "production" && status_code >= 500 && dst.service.name == "payment-service" && path.contains("/charge")
Other common RCA filters:
dns && dns_response && status_code != 0 // Failed DNS lookups
src.service.namespace != dst.service.namespace // Cross-namespace traffic
http && elapsed_time > 5000000 // Slow transactions (> 5s)
conn && conn_state == "open" && conn_local_bytes > 1000000 // High-volume connections
Combining Both Routes
The two routes are complementary. A common pattern:
- Start with Dissection — let the AI agent search and identify the root cause
- Once you've pinpointed the problematic workloads, use
list_workloads
to get their IPs (singular lookup by name+namespace, or filtered scan
by namespace/regex/labels against the snapshot)
- Switch to PCAP — export a filtered PCAP of just those workloads for
Wireshark deep-dive, sharing with the network team, or compliance archival
Use Cases
Post-Incident RCA
- Identify the incident time window from alerts, logs, or user reports
- Check
get_data_boundaries — is the window still in raw capture (L4)?
- Check
get_l7_data_boundaries — was dissection enabled at that time, and
does the window overlap with the L7 entry range? If dissection_enabled
is false or the window predates the L7 range, the Dissection route is
limited to whatever entries exist now — falling back to the PCAP route
is often the right call.
create_snapshot covering the incident window (add 15 minutes buffer)
- Dissection route:
start_snapshot_dissection → get_api_stats →
list_api_calls → get_api_call → follow the dependency chain
- PCAP route:
list_workloads → export_snapshot_pcap with BPF →
hand off to Wireshark or archive
Other Use Cases
- Trend analysis — Take snapshots at regular intervals and compare
get_api_stats across them to detect latency drift, error rate changes,
or new service-to-service connections.
- Forensic preservation —
create_snapshot + upload_snapshot_to_cloud
for immutable, long-term evidence. Downloadable to any cluster months later.
- Production-to-local replay — Upload a production snapshot to cloud,
download it on a local KinD cluster, and investigate safely.
Setup Reference
For CLI installation, MCP configuration, verification, and troubleshooting,
see references/setup.md.