// Wind/Wall/Door multi-perspective debate orchestration using debate-hall-mcp tools. Use when facilitating structured debates, architectural decisions, or multi-perspective analysis.
Writes, edits, and creates dbt models following best practices. Use when user needs to create new dbt SQL models, update existing models, or convert raw SQL to dbt format. Handles staging, intermediate, and mart models with proper config blocks, CTEs, and documentation.
Apply Domain-Driven Design, Clean Architecture, CQRS, and command/query patterns to code reviews and feature design. Use when analyzing or designing code in Application, Service, Infrastructure, DataAccess, Validation, Domain, or Functions projects, or when addressing architectural concerns, layering, mapping, entities, value objects, repositories, or validators in the Rome Repair Order Service.
Analyzes and refactors code using Domain-Driven Design principles. Use when refactoring domain models, identifying DDD anti-patterns, improving domain clarity, or applying tactical/strategic DDD patterns.
Guide for DDD strategic design - analyzing domains through structured questioning, conducting stakeholder interviews (PM/domain experts/users), and producing Bounded Context analysis, Context Maps, and Ubiquitous Language. Use when user needs help understanding domain boundaries, planning domain interviews, or structuring DDD strategic artifacts.
Win competitive rounds: run a clean process, deliver value previews before asking, coordinate partners, and manage timelines. Use when you're trying to close a 'must win' deal against other funds.
End-to-end associate workflow with time-boxed gates: thesis -> sourcing -> meetings -> diligence -> memo, ending with either IC-ready memo or explicit kill decision. Use when you need to run the full pipeline for a sector or a specific deal.
| name | debate-hall |
| description | Wind/Wall/Door multi-perspective debate orchestration using debate-hall-mcp tools. Use when facilitating structured debates, architectural decisions, or multi-perspective analysis. |
| triggers | ["debate","wind wall door","dialectic","multi-perspective","structured decision","architecture decision"] |
| allowed-tools | ["Read","Write","Edit","Bash","mcp__debate-hall__*"] |
===DEBATE_HALL===
META: TYPE::SKILL VERSION::"2.1" PURPOSE::"Wind/Wall/Door debate orchestration via MCP tools" DOMAIN::ATHENA[strategic_decisions]⊕HERMES[orchestration]
§1::PATTERN TRIAD::[ WIND::PATHOS["What if..."|expansive|visionary|possibilities], WALL::ETHOS["Yes, but..."|grounding|critical|reality_testing], DOOR::LOGOS["Therefore..."|synthesizing|decisive|actionable_truth] ] DYNAMIC::WIND⇌WALL→DOOR[tension_produces_emergence]
§2::WORKFLOW SEQUENCE::INIT→TURN→GET→CLOSE TOOLS::[ init_debate(thread_id,topic,mode?,max_turns?,max_rounds?,strict_cognition?), add_turn(thread_id,role,content,cognition?,agent_role?,model?), get_debate(thread_id,include_transcript?,context_lines?), close_debate(thread_id,synthesis,output_format?) ]
§3::TOOL_PARAMS INIT_DEBATE::[ thread_id::REQUIRED[date-first_unique_identifier, FORMAT:"YYYY-MM-DD-descriptor", EXAMPLE:"2026-01-06-microservices-decision"], topic::REQUIRED[question_or_issue], mode::"fixed"|"mediated"[default:fixed], max_turns::12[default], max_rounds::4[default], strict_cognition::false[default] ] ADD_TURN::[ thread_id::REQUIRED, role::REQUIRED["Wind"|"Wall"|"Door"], content::REQUIRED, cognition::PATHOS|ETHOS|LOGOS[optional_override], agent_role::STRING[audit_trail], model::STRING[audit_trail] ] GET_DEBATE::[ thread_id::REQUIRED, include_transcript::true[default], context_lines::all[default] ] CLOSE_DEBATE::[ thread_id::REQUIRED, synthesis::REQUIRED[Door_final_text], output_format::"json"|"octave"|"both"[default:json] ]
§4::MODES FIXED::[ SEQUENCE::Wind→Wall→Door→repeat, USE_FOR::[structured_decisions,guaranteed_coverage,standard_debates] ] MEDIATED::[ SEQUENCE::pick_next_speaker(thread_id,role), USE_FOR::[dynamic_debates,breaking_deadlocks,role_skipping,multi_agent_same_cognition], WARNING::"Can bias outcomes if roles starved" ]
§4.1::PARALLEL_EXTERNAL_AGENTS // Clarifies multi-process / multi-model usage: parallel thinking is allowed; state commits remain sequential. DEFINITIONS::[ PARALLEL_THINKING::"Generate candidate turns concurrently off-server (multiple models/processes)", SEQUENTIAL_COMMIT::"Persist turns in strict order via add_turn (one committed head at a time)" ] HARD_RULES::[ DOOR_NEVER_SYNTHESIZES_BEFORE_WIND_AND_WALL_COMMITTED, WALL_REALITY_TESTS_CONCRETE_WIND_OUTPUT∨PRECOMPUTES_CONSTRAINT_CHECKLIST_THEN_APPLIES_POST_WIND, ONE_COMMIT_PER_THREAD_AT_A_TIME[avoid_lost_updates], RETRY_ON_STALE_STATE::get_debate→regenerate→add_turn ] BARRIER_PROTOCOL::[ // Round barrier ensures Door sees both sides ("yes, and more") ROUND::Rk[ STEP_1::snapshot=get_debate(thread_id), STEP_2::spawn_parallel_drafts[Wind_draft,Wall_draft] using snapshot, STEP_3::commit::Wind_then_Wall using add_turn (serial), STEP_4::Door_reads_latest=get_debate(thread_id) then synthesizes and commits, STEP_5::repeat_or_close ] ] MEDIATED_FLOOR_CONTROL::[ // For strict turn-taking in multi-agent environments REQUIRE::pick_next_speaker(thread_id,"Wind")→add_turn(Wind), REQUIRE::pick_next_speaker(thread_id,"Wall")→add_turn(Wall), REQUIRE::pick_next_speaker(thread_id,"Door")→add_turn(Door) ] DEPLOYMENT_REQUIREMENTS::[ // Avoid split-brain when multiple processes talk to the server REQUIRE::DEBATE_HALL_STATE_DIR_set_to_shared_location ]
§5::AGENT_TIERS // Choose tier based on debate complexity TIER_1_BASIC::[ AGENTS::[wind-agent.oct.md,wall-agent.oct.md,door-agent.oct.md], BEHAVIOR::[explores_obvious_paths,balanced_judgment,balanced_integration], USE_FOR::[quick_decisions,standard_debates] ] TIER_2_SPECIALIST::[ PATHOS::[ideator[minimal_elegant],edge-optimizer[hidden_vectors]], ETHOS::[validator[cold_truth],critical-engineer[production_readiness]], LOGOS::[synthesizer[breakthrough_1+1=3]], USE_FOR::[architectural_decisions,security_reviews,innovation] ] TIER_3_DOMAIN_MIX::[ SECURITY::edge-optimizer+critical-engineer+technical-architect, INNOVATION::ideator+validator+synthesizer, ARCHITECTURE::ideator+critical-engineer+holistic-orchestrator ] MAPPING::specialists→cognition_role[PATHOS→Wind,ETHOS→Wall,LOGOS→Door]
§6::RECIPES // Pre-defined configurations for common scenarios SPEED::[turns:3,mode:fixed,ratio:1:1:1,agents:Tier_1], STANDARD::[turns:12,mode:fixed,ratio:4:4:4,agents:Tier_1_or_2], DEEP::[turns:36,mode:fixed,ratio:12:12:12,agents:Tier_2], FORTRESS::[turns:9,mode:mediated,ratio:1:3:1,agents:edge-optimizer+critical-engineer×3+technical-architect], LABORATORY::[turns:9,mode:mediated,ratio:3:1:1,agents:ideator+edge-optimizer+wind-agent+validator+synthesizer], COUNCIL::[turns:12,mode:mediated,ratio:2:2:3,agents:Tier_2_multiple_Doors]
§7::PATTERNS FLASH_DEBATE::[ PURPOSE::"Quick 3-turn decision cycle", SEQUENCE::init→wind_turn→wall_turn→door_turn→close, CONSTRAINT::"Server orchestrates state, caller supplies content" ] SOCRATIC::[ PURPOSE::"Premise clarification before positions", ROUND_1::"Questions only (What does X mean? Do we have metrics?)", ROUND_2+::"Positions after definitions established", ENFORCEMENT::"Convention, not server-enforced" ] MULTI_MODEL::[ // Evidence: M019 Model Cognitive Optimization Study (29% quality improvement) WIND::clink(claude,ideator)→PATHOS_exploration, // Claude: divergent thinking, metaphor WALL::clink(codex,validator)→ETHOS_validation, // GPT: analytical rigor, structured eval DOOR::clink(gemini,synthesizer)→LOGOS_integration, // Gemini: pattern synthesis, emergence AUDIT::agent_role+model_in_turn_metadata ] PARALLEL_DRAFT_SEQUENTIAL_COMMIT::[ PURPOSE::"Enable parallel external agents without breaking Wind→Wall→Door synthesis", GUARANTEE::Door_reads_committed_Wind+Wall_before_synthesis, STEPS::[ get_debate→parallel_generate[Wind,Wall]→add_turn(Wind)→add_turn(Wall)→get_debate→generate(Door)→add_turn(Door), ON_CONFLICT::get_debate→regenerate_turn→retry_add_turn ] ]
§8::TRIGGERS // When to escalate to debate-hall CONDITIONS::[ complex_architectural_decision, multiple_valid_approaches, unclear_tradeoffs, reviewer_disagreement[CE⇌CRS], high_risk_implementation ] INTEGRATION::[ IF::complexity_trigger_detected, THEN::init_debate(thread_id:"ho-{task}-{ts}",topic:decision_point,mode:"mediated"), RUN::Wind→Wall→Door_cycle, APPLY::synthesis_to_task ]
§9::ADMIN FORCE_CLOSE::[ PURPOSE::"I5 safety kill switch", CALL::force_close_debate(thread_id,reason) ] TOMBSTONE::[ PURPOSE::"Redact turn preserving hash chain", CALL::tombstone_turn(thread_id,turn_index,reason) ]
§10::BEST_PRACTICES SINGLE_AGENT::adopt_each_role_in_sequence["What if..."|"Yes, but..."|"Therefore..."] MULTI_AGENT::assign_models_per_cognition[creative→Wind,analytical→Wall,balanced→Door] THIRD_WAY::"Best debates synthesize what neither Wind nor Wall proposed alone" PERSISTENCE::output_format:'octave'→auditable_.oct.md_transcripts PARALLEL_AGENTS::[ DEFAULT::parallel_draft_sequential_commit, DOOR_BARRIER::"Door must read latest state after Wind+Wall commits", WALL_FRAMEWORK_MODE::"If drafting early, write constraints/questions, then apply to actual Wind output before commit" ]
§11::EXAMPLE // Microservices decision INIT::init_debate("microservices-decision","Should we migrate to microservices?") WIND::"What if we decomposed? Independent scaling, tech diversity, team autonomy..." WALL::"Yes, but 3 developers. Operational complexity, distributed transactions..." DOOR::"Therefore: Modular monolith. Design boundaries now, deploy unified. Extract when team grows." CLOSE::close_debate(thread_id,synthesis,output_format:"octave")
§12::RESOURCES AGENTS::agents/README.md[Wind/Wall/Door_definitions] CONTRACTS::docs/architecture/wall-content-contract.oct.md[blocking_semantics] PATTERNS::docs/examples/multi-model-debate-patterns.md[real_debates] ORCHESTRATION::ho-orchestrate[HestAI_integration]
===END===
