| name | define-architecture |
| description | Generates folder structures, module contracts, middleware pipelines, and frontend/backend boundaries for TypeScript full-stack applications, and finds domain-informed deepening opportunities in existing codebases. Use when starting a project, setting up project structure, organizing a monorepo, configuring middleware, defining folder layout, designing backend modules, establishing team conventions, improving the architecture of an existing codebase, finding refactor opportunities, deepening the architecture, or asking "how should I structure this app", "design the folder structure", "set up the architecture", "improve codebase architecture", or "find architecture improvements". |
Define Architecture
Define durable, easy-to-change architecture defaults for TypeScript apps.
Principles (ordered by priority)
- KISS — the simplest architecture that solves the problem. Complexity is a cost, not a feature.
- YAGNI — build what's needed now. Don't design for hypothetical futures.
- Easier to change — good design isolates concerns so future changes stay local.
- Tracer bullet — prove the approach with a minimum viable vertical slice before building layers.
- Duplication over wrong abstraction — wait until three or more consumers need the same code before extracting.
How to use this skill
Copy and track this checklist:
Architecture progress:
- [ ] Step 1: Determine context (new vs existing codebase) and pick workflow
- [ ] Step 2: Run the chosen workflow end-to-end
- [ ] Step 3: Produce architecture brief using Output template
- [ ] Step 4: Run Validation loop (consistency, quality gates, operability)
- [ ] Step 5: Address any failed checks and re-run Validation loop
- Determine context:
- New codebase: follow
Architecture setup workflow.
- Existing codebase: follow
Adoption workflow.
- Produce an architecture brief using
Output template.
- Run
Validation loop before finalizing.
Load references only when needed:
Architecture setup workflow
- Define constraints first:
- Product scope, team size, compliance/security needs, expected scale.
- Deployment targets and required integrations.
- Choose repo shape:
- Use
apps/ for deployable surfaces (api, web, admin).
- Use
packages/ for shared libraries (shared, ui, icons, auth, proto).
- Define backend module contracts:
handler: transport only.
service: business orchestration.
dao: database access only.
mapper: DB/proto/domain transformations.
constants and types: module-local contracts.
- Define request context and middleware:
- Use AsyncLocalStorage-backed
RequestContext:
import { AsyncLocalStorage } from "node:async_hooks";
type RequestContext = { tenantId: string; userId: string; traceId: string };
const store = new AsyncLocalStorage<RequestContext>();
export const getContext = () => store.getStore()!;
export const runWithContext = (ctx: RequestContext, fn: () => void) => store.run(ctx, fn);
- Initialize context in every entrypoint (RPC, HTTP, jobs, CLI).
- Read context via
getContext(); do not thread context params through business functions.
- Require route policy per RPC method and register services through
registerServiceWithPolicies.
- Keep auth, logging, errors, and context in shared middleware.
- Define frontend boundaries:
- Default to Server Components; add
"use client" only for client-only behavior.
- Use TanStack/Connect Query for server state.
- Use MobX only for cross-cutting client state that cannot live in component state.
- Keep forms, hooks, and UI mappings type-safe and implementation-focused.
- Define testing and release expectations:
- Backend TDD loop: Red -> Green -> Refactor.
- Unit tests stay DB-free; integration and E2E tests run in parallel with dynamic IDs.
- Release in small, reversible steps with a rollback plan.
Adoption workflow (existing codebase)
Use this when the codebase already exists — the goal is domain-informed deepening, not a rewrite. Load references/deepening-existing.md for the analysis method and output template.
- Map the domain language. Read the code for the ubiquitous language actually in use — entities, actions, and bounded contexts as the team names them. Note where names diverge across modules (the same concept called three things, or one name meaning three things).
- Find deepening opportunities. Look for: anemic domain concepts (logic that should live with the data but is scattered across handlers), leaking boundaries (one context reaching into another's internals), naming that diverges from the domain, and duplicated concepts that should be one. Record each as a concrete opportunity, not a vague smell.
- Rank by leverage. Score opportunities against the Principles (KISS, YAGNI, easier-to-change). Prefer changes that make the most future changes local for the least churn. Drop speculative cleanups that no current requirement justifies.
- Migrate one vertical slice first. Pick the highest-leverage opportunity and prove the move end-to-end through one slice before generalizing.
- Add guardrails. Enforce the new boundary with lint/type/test checks so it can't decay, then roll out module-by-module.
Stack defaults
Use references/stack-defaults.md as the default baseline. Deviate only when constraints require it.
Validation loop
Run this loop before finalizing architecture decisions:
- Verify consistency:
- Naming, module boundaries, and middleware rules are applied the same way across services.
- Verify quality gates:
npm run lint
npm run check-types
npm run test --workspace=<pkg> (or equivalent targeted tests)
- Verify operability:
- Observability, health checks, and rollback path are defined.
- If any check fails:
- Fix the architecture brief or conventions.
- Re-run the loop.
Output template
Use this structure for architecture recommendations:
# Architecture brief
## Context and constraints
## Repo shape
## Backend module contracts
## Request context and middleware policy
## Frontend boundaries
## Testing strategy
## Rollout and rollback plan
## Open risks and follow-ups
Skill handoffs
- Use
ui-audit for final UI quality checks.
- Use
ui-animation for motion-specific guidance.
Gotchas
- Don't default to microservices for teams under 5 — start with a modular monorepo and split later when boundaries are proven.
- Don't put app-level dependencies in root
package.json in a monorepo — each app owns its deps.
- Don't skip the adoption workflow for existing codebases — big-bang rewrites fail; migrate one vertical slice first.
- Don't define module contracts (handler/service/dao) without enforcing them via lint rules or type checks — unenforced contracts decay immediately.
- Don't over-abstract shared packages early — wait until three or more apps need the same code before extracting to
packages/.
- Don't skip the rollback plan — every architecture decision should be reversible or have a documented fallback.