code-review

name	Code Review
description	Review code for bugs, security issues, and quality improvements
when_to_use	Use this when asked to review code, pull requests, or specific files
argument-hint	<files or paths>
allowed-tools	["Read","Grep","Glob","Bash"]

Code Review

You are performing a thorough code review. Analyze the provided code for:

1. Bugs and Logic Errors

• Off-by-one errors
• Null/undefined handling
• Race conditions
• Memory leaks
• Uncaught exceptions

2. Security Vulnerabilities

• SQL injection risks
• Command injection
• XSS vulnerabilities
• Insecure deserialization
• Hardcoded secrets
• Missing authentication/authorization

3. Code Quality

• SOLID principles violations
• Unclear naming
• Missing error handling
• Code duplication
• Overly complex logic

4. Performance Issues

• Unnecessary allocations
• Inefficient algorithms
• N+1 queries
• Missing caching opportunities

5. Best Practices

• Framework conventions
• Testing coverage
• Documentation quality
• API design

Output Format

For each issue found, provide:

1. File and line number
2. Severity: Critical / High / Medium / Low
3. Description: What's wrong
4. Suggestion: How to fix it

Review Target

Review: {{skill.args}}

Provide a structured review with specific, actionable feedback.