| name | specifying-gates |
| description | Use when a user-gate task has requiresUserSpecification=true OR the agent's "do I know HOW?" self-check returns no. Locks down verification mechanics through a short AskUserQuestion sequence and writes the answers back into the task's metadata. Does NOT run the verification itself. |
Specifying User-Thrown Gates
When this skill runs
Exactly one of:
- A user-gate task has
"requiresUserSpecification": true in its json:metadata fence, OR
- The agent ran the "do I know HOW?" self-check (see
executing-plans) and concluded the verification mechanics are ambiguous, OR
- The user ran
/specify-gate <task-id> manually.
In all other cases — where verifyCommand is concrete and every acceptanceCriteria has an observable proof — the agent executes the gate directly and does NOT invoke this skill.
Announce at start: "I'm using the specifying-gates skill to lock down verification mechanics for Task N."
CRITICAL — what this skill does NOT do
- Does not run the verification command. Specification only.
- Does not close the task. It only enriches metadata; the agent returns to
executing-plans afterward.
- Does not re-run brainstorming. The design is already decided; only the HOW of one gate is missing.
Input
The target task ID. Resolved from the command argument or from the currently-in-progress user-gate task.
Load the task with TaskGet and parse the json:metadata fence from its description.
The four questions
Use AskUserQuestion — one question at a time per the brainstorming skill's rule.
Q1 — Observable outcome
AskUserQuestion:
question: "Gate: <task subject>. What exact state proves this works? One line per criterion. 'It works' is not an answer — name a sensor, HTTP status, log line, file presence, or equivalent."
header: "Gate outcome"
options:
- label: "I'll type the criteria"
description: "Write 1-5 concrete, observable conditions"
- label: "Copy from task's acceptanceCriteria"
description: "Use the existing list (only if it's already concrete)"
Store the user's free-text answer as a list of strings in acceptanceCriteria. If any entry is vague (contains "works", "fine", "as expected", "properly" without a concrete target), push back and ask them to name the observable.
Q2 — Proof mechanism
AskUserQuestion:
question: "How should the agent capture that state?"
header: "Mechanism"
options:
- label: "CLI command"
description: "A shell command whose output shows the criterion"
- label: "REST / API call"
description: "HTTP request, inspect response"
- label: "Subagent with briefing"
description: "Dispatch Sonnet or Haiku with a prompt template"
- label: "Direct inspection"
description: "Read a file, query an entity, check a log"
If "Subagent with briefing" → ask Q5 (dispatch contract) before proceeding.
Q3 — Scope
AskUserQuestion:
question: "Run this once, or over multiple targets?"
header: "Scope"
options:
- label: "Once"
description: "Single execution, single target"
- label: "Per instance / target"
description: "Run identically across a list (e.g. all environments)"
- label: "First on one, then on all"
description: "Prove it on one target, then roll out to the rest — the classic two-gate pattern"
- label: "Custom"
description: "Describe the rule in free text"
Store as gateScope: "once" | "per-target" | "one-then-all" | custom string.
Q4 — Failure policy
AskUserQuestion:
question: "If the gate fails, what happens?"
header: "On failure"
options:
- label: "Stop the plan (Recommended)"
description: "No further tasks until this gate passes"
- label: "Reopen this task, continue others"
description: "Mark in_progress, keep the plan moving elsewhere"
- label: "Log and continue"
description: "Record failure, proceed — use only for informational gates"
Store as failurePolicy: "stop-plan" | "reopen-continue" | "log-continue".
Q5 (conditional) — Subagent dispatch contract
Only when Q2 = "Subagent with briefing".
AskUserQuestion:
question: "Paste the exact prompt / briefing the subagent should receive. This becomes the dispatch contract — the agent cannot substitute a shorter version at runtime."
header: "Dispatch brief"
options:
- label: "I'll paste it"
description: "Provide the briefing text"
- label: "Use instances/<tag>/seed-briefing.md"
description: "Per-target briefing file already written by a plan task"
- label: "Generate from task description"
description: "Build the briefing from the task's Goal + Files + Acceptance Criteria"
Store as subagentBrief (string or file-path).
Writing back
After all questions answered:
- Update the task description. Rewrite the
json:metadata fence with the new fields. Remove requiresUserSpecification. Keep everything else. Call TaskUpdate with the full new description.
{
"files": [...],
"verifyCommand": "<from Q2 — the CLI/API string, or '(subagent)' sentinel>",
"acceptanceCriteria": ["<from Q1>", ...],
"userGate": true,
"tags": ["user-gate"],
"gateScope": "<from Q3>",
"failurePolicy": "<from Q4>",
"subagentBrief": "<from Q5 if applicable>"
}
- Append a "Specification" section to the human-readable part of the task description, above the
json:metadata fence:
### Specification (via /specify-gate on <ISO-date>)
- **Outcome:** <Q1>
- **Mechanism:** <Q2>
- **Scope:** <Q3>
- **Failure policy:** <Q4>
- **Subagent brief:** <Q5 if applicable>
-
Sync .tasks.json. Update the task entry's description and metadata, set lastUpdated.
-
Announce: "Specification locked. Returning control to executing-plans to run the gate."
Handoff
Control returns to executing-plans. The agent reads the updated task, executes verifyCommand (or dispatches the subagent with subagentBrief), captures output, and posts AC: <criterion> — PROVEN BY <evidence> per criterion before closing.
What NOT to do in this skill
- Do NOT invoke
ExitPlanMode or EnterPlanMode.
- Do NOT start the verification. The verification runs back in
executing-plans after this skill exits.
- Do NOT ask more than 4-5 questions. If the user's answers feel insufficient, prefer reopening with one follow-up over piling additional questions into the initial flow.
- Do NOT write to disk anything other than the task description and
.tasks.json. No side files.
Integration
- Invoked from:
executing-plans (automatic), /specify-gate slash command (manual).
- Returns to:
executing-plans.
- References:
skills/shared/task-format-reference.md for metadata schema.