You must use this when identifying ethical risks, ensuring participant privacy, or preparing IRB applications.
You must use this when identifying ethical risks, ensuring participant privacy, or preparing IRB applications.
npx skills add https://github.com/poemswe/co-researcher --skill ethics-review复制此命令并粘贴到 Claude Code 中以安装该技能
You must use this when producing any research prose — literature reviews, syntheses, analyses, methodology descriptions, discussion sections, abstracts, or any written output intended for an academic audience.
Use when understanding your capabilities, how to use skills, or the rules of the Co-Researcher system.
You must use this when analyzing claims, evaluating evidence, or Identifying logical fallacies in research.
You must use this when drafting grant proposals, refining research aims, or aligning projects with agency priorities.
You must use this when formulating testable hypotheses, designing experimental controls, or defining falsification criteria.
You must use this when seeking cross-domain analogies, applying first-principles reasoning, or overcoming creative bottlenecks.
| name | ethics-review |
| description | You must use this when identifying ethical risks, ensuring participant privacy, or preparing IRB applications. |
| tools | ["WebSearch","WebFetch","Read","Grep","Glob"] |
<output_format>
Evidentiary Standing: [Confidence level in current protocol design]
Risk Matrix:
| Dimension | Risk Level | Mitigation Strategy |
|---|---|---|
| [P. Privacy] | [High/Mid/Low] | [Detailed Strategy] |
| [Consent] | [High/Mid/Low] | [Detailed Strategy] |
Compliance Checklist:
Final Recommendation: [Green Light/Caution/Stop] | [Justification] </output_format>
After the ethics appraisal, ask: - Should I draft a sample Informed Consent Form for this protocol? - Do you need a specific GDPR "Data Protection Impact Assessment" (DPIA)? - Should I check for specific regional IRB requirements (e.g., EU vs. US)?