review-changes

name	review_changes
description	Reviews code changes for Rubydex

The user will explain what they are implementing in a set of code changes. If they don't, ask for clarification.

• If there are unstaged changes, consider those the implementation
• If there are no unstaged changes, run bin/branch_diff to get the implementation
• Always consider applicable documentation listed under docs

rust/rubydex changes:

Use the Rust and static analysis experts to review the code changes regarding the following criteria.

• Correctness: does it model Ruby code properly? Are we missing valid scenarios?
• Code quality and idiomatic patterns: does the code use idiomatic Rust? Are there opportunities to improve the code structure?
• Performance: are there any performance pitfalls or opportunities for optimization?
• Test coverage: are we missing scenarios? Are there repeated test setups that could be extracted into a test helper?
• Documentation: are the key concepts clearly explained in the documentation (files under docs and README)?
• Agent instructions: are there key concepts or major changes that should be reflected in AGENTS.md?

rust/rubydex-sys changes:

Review the FFI changes and consider safety and correctness when bridging between Rust and C.

ext or Ruby file changes:

Use the Ruby expert to review the code changes regarding the following criteria.

• Correctness: does it implement the intended functionality properly? Are there edge cases we are missing?
• Code quality and idiomatic patterns: does the code use idiomatic C and Ruby?
• Performance: are there any performance pitfalls or opportunities for optimization?
• Name conventions: does it follow the conventions outlined in the documentation?