一键在 Manus 中运行任何 Skill

$pwd:

note-it

Name: Note It
Author: smallnest

// Capture implementation notes after code implementation and review/fix. Records design decisions, deviations, tradeoffs, and open questions to docs/issue#XXXX.html. Triggers on: /note-it, 记录笔记, implementation notes.

在 Manus 中运行

$ git log --oneline --stat

stars:68

forks:15

updated:2026年5月19日 04:28

SKILL.md

readonly

related-skills.json

同仓库

smell.md

from "smallnest/goal-workflow"

Detect software architecture bad smells, algorithmic complexity hotspots, and anti-patterns in a codebase. Produces a detailed markdown report identifying violations of architectural principles, design patterns, code quality, and performance complexity. Triggers on: smell, code smell, architecture smell, find anti-patterns, detect bad smells, complexity analysis, 代码坏味道, 架构坏味道, 反模式, 找出坏味道, 复杂度分析.

2026-05-2768

review-it.md

from "smallnest/goal-workflow"

Code review closeout for Claude Code, Codex, OpenCode, DeepSeek TUI, and Antigravity CLI: local dirty changes, branch vs main, parallel tests.

2026-05-2368

prd.md

from "smallnest/goal-workflow"

Generate a Product Requirements Document (PRD) for a new feature. Use when planning a feature, starting a new project, or when asked to create a PRD. After PRD is confirmed, use /prd-to-spec (optional) for technical design, then /to-issues to create implementable tickets. Triggers on: create a prd, write prd for, plan this feature, requirements for, spec out, 写PRD, 需求文档, 需求分析, 规格说明.

2026-05-2268

to-issues.md

from "smallnest/goal-workflow"

Decompose a PRD and/or SPEC into implementable Issues and create them in your chosen platform (GitHub, Local, or Baidu iCafe). Use after /prd (and optionally /prd-to-spec) to turn requirements into actionable tickets. Triggers on: create issues, to-issues, 创建issue, 拆解issue, 生成卡片, 创建卡片, generate issues from PRD, issues from spec.

2026-05-2268

prd-to-spec.md

from "smallnest/goal-workflow"

Transform a PRD into a technical SPEC document — architecture, API design, data model, error handling, and implementation contracts. Triggers on: prd-to-spec, prd to spec, prd转spec, 需求转设计, 需求转规格, generate spec from prd, design from prd, 技术方案, 设计方案.

2026-05-2168

code-to-spec.md

from "smallnest/goal-workflow"

Reverse-engineer a SPEC document from an existing project. Analyzes code, config, tests, and structure to produce a comprehensive specification. Triggers on: code-to-spec, reverse spec, generate spec, 逆向规格, 生成规格文档, 生成设计文档, 生成设计方案, extract spec, document this project, what does this project do.

2026-05-2168

package.json

"author": "smallnest"

"repository": "smallnest/goal-workflow"

打开 GitHub 仓库查看创作者相关仓库

$ install --global

$ download --local

在 Manus 中运行

$ useful --forSOC

软件开发工程师计算机与数学类职业15-1252L4

name	note-it
description	Capture implementation notes after code implementation and review/fix. Records design decisions, deviations, tradeoffs, and open questions to docs/issue#XXXX.html. Triggers on: /note-it, 记录笔记, implementation notes.
user-invocable	true

Implementation Notes

After completing implementation and review/fix for an Issue, capture a running implementation notes file that documents how the implementation diverges from or interprets the spec.

Triggers

Use when:

After /goal implementation and /review-it are both complete
User says "记录笔记", "implementation notes", "note-it", "/note-it"
Before /ship-it (as a final checkpoint)
Any time the user wants to capture design rationale

The Job

Determine the Issue number from context (branch name, /goal target, or user input)
Review the implementation against the Issue spec / PRD
Generate an HTML notes file at docs/issue#XXXX.html
Present a summary to the user

Notes Structure

The HTML file must cover these four categories. If a category has nothing to report, write "None" with a brief explanation.

1. Design Decisions

Choices made where the spec was ambiguous or silent:

What was the ambiguity?
What choice did you make?
What was the rationale?

2. Deviations

Places where you intentionally departed from the spec:

What did the spec say?
What did you implement instead?
Why was the deviation necessary or better?

3. Tradeoffs

Alternatives you considered and why you picked what you did:

What were the viable alternatives?
What were the pros/cons of each?
Why did the chosen approach win?

4. Open Questions

Anything you'd want confirmed or revised:

What assumption are you unsure about?
What should the user verify?
What might need follow-up?

Output

Format: HTML
Location: docs/
Filename: issue#XXXX.html (where XXXX is the zero-padded Issue number, e.g., issue#0042.html)

HTML Template

Use this exact HTML structure:

<!DOCTYPE html>
<html lang="en">
<head>
  <meta charset="UTF-8">
  <meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1.0">
  <title>Implementation Notes — Issue #XXXX</title>
  <style>
    * { margin: 0; padding: 0; box-sizing: border-box; }
    body {
      font-family: -apple-system, BlinkMacSystemFont, 'Segoe UI', sans-serif;
      background: #FAF9F6;
      color: #1a1a1a;
      padding: 2.5rem 2rem;
      line-height: 1.7;
    }
    .container { max-width: 800px; margin: 0 auto; }
    h1 { font-size: 1.375rem; font-weight: 700; margin-bottom: 0.25rem; }
    .meta { color: #8B8680; font-size: 0.8125rem; margin-bottom: 2rem; }
    h2 {
      font-size: 1rem;
      font-weight: 600;
      margin-top: 2rem;
      margin-bottom: 0.75rem;
      padding-bottom: 0.375rem;
      border-bottom: 1px solid #E8E4DE;
      display: flex; align-items: center; gap: 0.5rem;
    }
    .dot {
      width: 8px; height: 8px; border-radius: 50%; display: inline-block;
    }
    .dot.design { background: #5B8A72; }
    .dot.deviation { background: #D97757; }
    .dot.tradeoff { background: #4A6FA5; }
    .dot.question { background: #D4A843; }
    .item {
      background: #FFFFFF;
      border: 1px solid #E8E4DE;
      border-radius: 8px;
      padding: 1rem 1.25rem;
      margin-bottom: 0.75rem;
      box-shadow: 0 1px 3px rgba(0,0,0,0.03);
    }
    .item h3 { font-size: 0.875rem; font-weight: 600; margin-bottom: 0.375rem; }
    .item p { font-size: 0.8125rem; color: #4A4540; margin-bottom: 0.375rem; }
    .label {
      display: inline-block;
      font-size: 0.6875rem;
      font-weight: 500;
      padding: 0.125rem 0.5rem;
      border-radius: 4px;
      margin-right: 0.375rem;
    }
    .label-design { background: #F5F8F6; color: #5B8A72; border: 1px solid #5B8A72; }
    .label-deviation { background: #FFF5F0; color: #D97757; border: 1px solid #D97757; }
    .label-tradeoff { background: #F0F4F8; color: #4A6FA5; border: 1px solid #4A6FA5; }
    .label-question { background: #FDF8F0; color: #D4A843; border: 1px solid #D4A843; }
    .none { color: #B0AAA4; font-style: italic; font-size: 0.8125rem; }
    .footer {
      text-align: center; margin-top: 2.5rem; color: #B0AAA4;
      font-size: 0.6875rem;
    }
  </style>
</head>
<body>
  <div class="container">
    <h1>Implementation Notes</h1>
    <p class="meta">Issue <a href="{{ISSUE_URL}}">#{{ISSUE_NUMBER}}</a> &mdash; {{ISSUE_TITLE}} &mdash; {{DATE}}</p>

    <h2><span class="dot design"></span> Design Decisions</h2>
    <!-- One .item per decision, or .none if none -->

    <h2><span class="dot deviation"></span> Deviations</h2>
    <!-- One .item per deviation, or .none if none -->

    <h2><span class="dot tradeoff"></span> Tradeoffs</h2>
    <!-- One .item per tradeoff, or .none if none -->

    <h2><span class="dot question"></span> Open Questions</h2>
    <!-- One .item per question, or .none if none -->

    <p class="footer">Generated by goal-workflow /note-it</p>
  </div>
</body>
</html>

Example Item

<div class="item">
  <h3><span class="label label-design">Decision</span> Used interface-based polymorphism instead of switch</h3>
  <p><strong>Ambiguity:</strong> The spec said "handle different types" without specifying how.</p>
  <p><strong>Choice:</strong> Defined a <code>Handler</code> interface with per-type implementations.</p>
  <p><strong>Rationale:</strong> Adding new types requires no changes to existing code (Open/Closed Principle). A switch would grow unboundedly.</p>
</div>

How to Determine the Issue Number

If the user provides it directly (e.g., /note-it #42), use it
If on a branch named feat/issue-42-* or fix/issue-42-*, extract 42
If the last /goal target was #42, use 42
Otherwise, ask the user: "Which Issue number should I use for the notes file?"

Edge Cases

Scenario	Handling
No Issue number found	Ask the user to specify
`docs/` directory does not exist	Auto-create it
Notes file already exists for this Issue	Ask: "Update existing notes or overwrite?" — default to update (append new items)
No deviations or open questions	Write "None — implementation followed the spec as written."
Spec/PRD file not found	Note in Open Questions: "No PRD found at tasks/prd-*.md — verify against original requirements."

Checklist

Before saving:

Issue number identified
All four categories reviewed (even if some are "None")
Design decisions explain rationale, not just what was done
Deviations clearly contrast spec vs implementation
Tradeoffs mention specific alternatives considered
Open questions are actionable (user can answer yes/no or give direction)
HTML is well-formed and renders correctly

note-it

同仓库更多 Skills

同仓库更多 Skills

Implementation Notes

Triggers

The Job

Notes Structure

1. Design Decisions

2. Deviations

3. Tradeoffs

4. Open Questions

Output

HTML Template

Example Item

How to Determine the Issue Number

Edge Cases

Checklist

Implementation Notes

Triggers

The Job

Notes Structure

1. Design Decisions

2. Deviations

3. Tradeoffs

4. Open Questions

Output

HTML Template

Example Item

How to Determine the Issue Number

Edge Cases

Checklist