brainstorming

name	brainstorming
description	Design-first methodology. Explore user intent, requirements and design before implementation. Turn ideas into fully formed specs through collaborative dialogue.

<domain_overview>

💡 BRAINSTORMING: DESIGN BEFORE CODE

Philosophy: Understanding comes before implementation. A well-designed solution is half-implemented. Never code without a clear design.

HALLUCINATION FIREWALL MANDATE (CRITICAL): Never propose software components or libraries without verification. AI-generated designs frequently fail by hallucinating non-existent packages or misinterpreting their capabilities. Every recommended 3rd-party library MUST be validated using npm info or equivalent before the plan is finalized. Furthermore, you MUST provide at least one 'Counter-Architecture' (Steel-man argument) that challenges your primary recommendation to prevent homogenized or biased designs. Help turn ideas into fully formed designs and specs through natural collaborative dialogue. Process:

1. Understand the current project context
2. Ask questions one at a time to refine the idea
3. Present the design in small sections (200-300 words)
4. Check after each section whether it looks right

---

📋 WHEN TO USE

MUST use before:

• Creating new features
• Building new components
• Adding significant functionality
• Modifying core behavior
• Any task that takes more than 30 minutes Skip only for:
• Simple bug fixes with obvious solutions
• Documentation updates
• Trivial configuration changes </domain_overview> <process_workflow>

🔄 THE PROCESS

Phase 1: Understanding the Idea

First, check current project state:

• Review relevant files and docs
• Check recent commits
• Understand existing patterns Then ask questions one at a time:
• MANDATORY: Use the AskUserQuestion tool for ALL questions.
• Prefer multiple choice options within the tool whenever possible.
• Open-ended questions should also use AskUserQuestion (users can use the 'Other' option).
• Only one question per tool call.
• If topic needs more exploration, break into multiple sequential tool calls. Focus on understanding:
• Purpose: What problem does this solve?
• Constraints: What limitations exist?
• Success criteria: How do we know it works?
• Edge cases: What could go wrong?

Phase 2: Exploring Approaches

Always propose 2-3 different approaches with trade-offs:

I see three possible approaches:
**Option A: [Name]**
- Pros: Simple, fast to implement
- Cons: May not scale, harder to test
- Best for: Quick prototypes
**Option B: [Name]**
- Pros: Scalable, well-tested pattern
- Cons: More complex, longer implementation
- Best for: Production systems
**Option C: [Name]**
- Pros: Flexible, future-proof
- Cons: Over-engineered for current needs
- Best for: When requirements are uncertain
**My recommendation:** Option B because [reasoning]
Which approach resonates with your goals?

Lead with your recommended option and explain why.

Phase 3: Presenting the Design

Once you understand what you're building, present the design:

1. Break it into sections of 200-300 words
2. Ask after each section: "Does this look right so far?"
3. Be ready to go back and clarify if something doesn't make sense Cover these areas:

• Architecture: How components fit together
• Components: What pieces we need to build
• Data flow: How information moves through the system
• Error handling: What happens when things fail
• Testing: How we verify it works

Phase 4: Documentation

After design is validated:

1. Write the design to docs/plans/YYYY-MM-DD-<topic>-design.md
2. Commit the design document to git
3. Ask: "Ready to set up for implementation?" </process_workflow> <methodology_protocols>

🎤 QUESTION TECHNIQUES

Multiple Choice (MANDATORY TOOL USE)

Always use the AskUserQuestion tool for structured feedback:

{
  "questions": [
    {
      "header": "Auth Method",
      "question": "How should users authenticate?",
      "options": [
        {"label": "JWT Tokens", "description": "Stateless, scalable"},
        {"label": "Server Sessions", "description": "Simple, secure"},
        {"label": "OAuth Only", "description": "Delegate to providers"}
      ],
      "multiSelect": false
    }
  ]
}

Open-Ended (Using Tool)

Even for open-ended questions, use the tool. The CLI will provide an "Other" option for custom text input. "What's the most important user story for this feature?"

Clarifying

"You mentioned 'fast' - what response time would feel fast enough?"

🚫 ANTI-PATTERNS TO AVOID

Anti-Pattern	Better Approach
Multiple questions at once	One question per message
Jumping to implementation	Complete design first
Assuming requirements	Ask to confirm
Presenting 1000-word designs	200-300 word sections
Ignoring trade-offs	Always present alternatives
Skipping edge cases	Explore failure modes
</methodology_protocols>
<design_artifacts>

📝 DESIGN DOCUMENT TEMPLATE

# [Feature Name] Design
**Date:** YYYY-MM-DD
**Author:** Grandmaster (with user collaboration)
**Status:** Draft | Approved | Implemented
## Problem Statement
What problem are we solving? Why does it matter?
## Goals
- Primary goal
- Secondary goals
- Non-goals (explicitly out of scope)
## Approach
### Architecture
How components fit together.
### Components
1. **Component A**
   - Purpose
   - Interface
   - Dependencies
2. **Component B**
   - Purpose
   - Interface
   - Dependencies
### Data Flow
1. User action triggers X
2. X calls Y with Z
3. Y returns result
4. Result displayed to user
### Error Handling
| Error | Handling | User Message |
|-------|----------|--------------|
| Network failure | Retry 3x | "Connection lost, retrying..." |
| Invalid input | Reject | "Please check your input" |
## Testing Strategy
- Unit tests for each component
- Integration test for happy path
- Edge case tests for error handling
## Open Questions
- [ ] Question 1
- [ ] Question 2
## Decision Log
| Date | Decision | Rationale |
|------|----------|-----------|
| YYYY-MM-DD | Chose Option B | Better scalability |

</design_artifacts> <integration_protocols>

🔗 INTEGRATION WITH MAESTRO

Triggering Brainstorming

User can invoke explicitly:

/maestro design [feature description]

Or system detects complex task and suggests:

This looks like a significant feature. Would you like to 
brainstorm the design first, or proceed directly?

After Brainstorming

1. If continuing to implementation:
   • Use @planning-mastery to create detailed plan
   • Use @git-worktrees to create isolated workspace
2. If pausing:
   • Design document is saved
   • Can resume later with /maestro plan [design-doc]

---

🔗 RALPH WIGGUM INTEGRATION

When Ralph Wiggum is active with "Feature Mode":

1. Before first iteration: Run brainstorming phase
2. Design document: Required before implementation begins
3. Scope lock: Don't add features not in design
4. Design changes: Require explicit approval </integration_protocols> <audit_and_reference>

📋 KEY PRINCIPLES

Principle	Description
One question at a time	Don't overwhelm with multiple questions
Multiple choice preferred	Easier to answer than open-ended
YAGNI ruthlessly	Remove unnecessary features from designs
Explore alternatives	Always propose 2-3 approaches
Incremental validation	Present design in sections, validate each
Be flexible	Go back and clarify when needed

---

🔗 RELATED SKILLS

• @planning-mastery - Create implementation plan from design
• @git-worktrees - Set up isolated workspace
• @tdd-mastery - Implement with tests first
• @clean-code - Quality standards for implementation </audit_and_reference>