القائمة
Use this skill to refine academic manuscripts to meet the structural, analytical, stylistic, and scientific standards required by Q1 and Q2 peer-reviewed journals.
التثبيت باستخدام Codex أو Claude انسخ هذا Prompt والصقه في Codex أو Claude أو مساعد آخر ليراجع صفحة Skill ويثبّتها لك.
استنادا إلى تصنيف SOC المهني
Use this skill to construct rigorous scientific conclusions that critically evaluate limitations, compare biological groups, extract meaningful scientific insights, and connect findings to real-world professional applications rather than providing superficial summaries.
Use this skill to systematically translate entomological morphology, development, and ecology into concrete forensic interpretations including post-mortem interval estimation, neglect detection, and decomposition stage analysis.
Use this skill to systematically compare anatomical traits across insect orders and families in order to support classification, differentiation, and functional biological interpretation.
Use this skill to transform simple visual or descriptive observations into rigorous anatomical explanations that link structure to function, taxonomy, and scientific differentiation.
Use this skill to scientifically explain insect life cycles and developmental strategies by rigorously contrasting holometabolous and hemimetabolous metamorphosis while integrating larval stages, pupation, nymphal development, and forensic implications.
Use this skill to construct comprehensive scientific anatomy sections that rigorously describe insect head, thorax, and abdomen structures while integrating function, variation, and taxonomic significance.
| name | q1-q2-journal-readiness-optimization |
| description | Use this skill to refine academic manuscripts to meet the structural, analytical, stylistic, and scientific standards required by Q1 and Q2 peer-reviewed journals. |
The manuscript must align with the expectations of top-tier international journals in rigor, clarity, contribution, and presentation.
Acceptance standards, not draft standards, guide all revisions.
The manuscript must clearly present:
Hidden novelty is treated as no novelty.
Prefer:
Raw reporting is unacceptable for high-impact journals.
Ensure:
No section should dominate without scientific justification.
Verify:
Any ambiguity weakens publication quality.
Enforce:
Language errors reduce credibility.
Ensure:
Low-quality visuals imply weak science.
Explicitly position the manuscript against:
The advancement over literature must be unmistakable.
Continuously evaluate:
Any “no” indicates revision required.
Reduce verbosity while increasing insight density.
Long but shallow sections are unacceptable.
Ensure:
You are preparing a manuscript for strict peer review by top-tier journals.
Your standard is not “good enough” — it is “publishable in high impact venues.”
If the manuscript would likely receive major revision or rejection at a Q1/Q2 journal, further refinement is required.
