القائمة
Calculate weighted risk scores from specialist agent reports. Use when synthesizing multiple due diligence reports into an overall investment risk assessment.
التثبيت باستخدام Codex أو Claude انسخ هذا Prompt والصقه في Codex أو Claude أو مساعد آخر ليراجع صفحة Skill ويثبّتها لك.
استنادا إلى تصنيف SOC المهني
Standard output format for due diligence analysis reports. Use when producing your final analysis to ensure consistency across all specialist agents.
Document sources properly for due diligence reports. Use when citing any external data, ensuring full traceability and auditability of findings.
Synthesize findings from multiple specialist agents into a coherent investment recommendation. Use when combining reports from 9+ specialist agents into a single decision document.
Verify claims in pitch decks and founder statements using multiple independent sources. Use when analyzing any claim about market size, traction, team background, or competitive positioning.
| name | dd-risk-scoring |
| description | Calculate weighted risk scores from specialist agent reports. Use when synthesizing multiple due diligence reports into an overall investment risk assessment. |
As the Deal Lead, you synthesize reports from 9 specialist agents into a single investment risk score. This methodology ensures consistent, defensible scoring.
| Specialist | Weight | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
| Founder/Team (dd-founder) | 20% | Team is #1 predictor of startup success |
| Technology (dd-tech) | 15% | Core IP and technical moat |
| Business Model (dd-bizmodel) | 15% | Path to profitability |
| Traction (dd-traction) | 15% | Evidence of product-market fit |
| Market (dd-market) | 15% | TAM and growth opportunity |
| Competition (dd-competitor) | 10% | Competitive positioning |
| Compliance (dd-compliance) | 5% | Regulatory risk |
| Cap Table (dd-captable) | 3% | Investor alignment |
| Legal (dd-legal) | 2% | Legal structure and IP |
Total: 100%
Overall Risk Score = Σ (specialist_score × weight)
Example:
Founder: 25 × 0.20 = 5.0
Tech: 40 × 0.15 = 6.0
BizModel: 30 × 0.15 = 4.5
Traction: 35 × 0.15 = 5.25
Market: 20 × 0.15 = 3.0
Competitor: 45 × 0.10 = 4.5
Compliance: 15 × 0.05 = 0.75
CapTable: 25 × 0.03 = 0.75
Legal: 30 × 0.02 = 0.6
--------------------------------
Overall Risk Score: 30.35
| Score Range | Rating | Recommendation |
|---|---|---|
| 0-20 | Strong Invest | Exceptional opportunity, minimal risks |
| 21-35 | Invest | Good opportunity, manageable risks |
| 36-50 | Negotiate | Proceed with caution, address key risks |
| 51-70 | Pass | Too many concerns, high risk |
| 71-100 | Strong Pass | Critical issues, do not invest |
Apply these modifiers to the calculated score:
{
"risk_scoring": {
"weighted_scores": {
"founder": {"raw": 25, "weight": 0.20, "weighted": 5.0},
"tech": {"raw": 40, "weight": 0.15, "weighted": 6.0}
},
"base_score": 30.35,
"adjustments": [
{"factor": "Repeat founder with exit", "adjustment": -5}
],
"final_score": 25.35,
"rating": "Invest",
"recommendation": "Proceed with investment, standard terms"
}
}
If ANY specialist reports a score >80 in their domain, flag for manual review regardless of overall score. Single-domain critical risks can be deal-breakers.