Use whenever creating, drafting, finalizing, or amending a git commit or a pull request in the Actual Budget repo (actualbudget/actual) — including phrases like "commit this", "make a commit", "stage and commit", "open a PR", "create a pull request", "send this for review", "push these changes", "ship it", "submit a PR", "raise a PR", or any time finishing implementation work in this repo where committing or opening a PR is the natural next step. Also trigger when the user mentions the `[AI]` prefix, the PR template, git hooks, or `--no-verify` in this repo. The repo enforces strict, non-obvious rules for AI-generated contributions (mandatory `[AI]` prefix on every commit message and PR title, leaving the PR template blank, never skipping hooks, specific git-safety constraints, a pre-commit quality checklist) and not following them produces commits and PRs that have to be redone or manually fixed by a maintainer.
Comprehensive review of a pull request in the actualbudget/actual repo. Performs an offline code review against the repo's CODE_REVIEW_GUIDELINES.md and AGENTS.md (no GitHub comments are ever posted), then browser-tests the change with playwright-cli. For bug PRs, reproduces the issue on edge.actualbudget.org first and verifies the fix on the Netlify preview; for feature/enhancement PRs, exercises the change on the preview and captures annotated screenshots highlighting the new functionality. Use whenever the user asks to review, test, validate, vet, sanity-check, QA, or otherwise look at a PR / pull request in the Actual Budget repo — including phrases like "review
Use whenever creating, updating, editing, drafting, restructuring, or fixing documentation in the Actual Budget repo — specifically anything under `packages/docs/` (the Docusaurus site published at actualbudget.org/docs) or any change to `.md` / `.mdx` files in that package. Trigger for asks like "add a doc page for X", "update the FAQ", "write a guide for the new feature", "document this setting", "fix the docs about Y", "add a contributing page", or any work on the docs site, even when the user does not explicitly mention style, structure, or conventions. Actual's docs follow strict Docusaurus conventions (front matter, heading levels, image placement and naming, admonition syntax, Title Case, tone of voice, spelling allowlist) and writing them without consulting the project's style guide reliably produces output that fails review and needs to be redone.