القائمة
Script-first review-only GitHub pull request analysis. Use for deterministic PR review with structured findings handoff to /prepare-pr.
يُحدَّد Prompt الذي يراجع المصدر أولًا بشكل افتراضي. يمكنك التبديل إلى أمر مباشر أو تنزيل نسخة محلية.
اقرأ SKILL.md وأي ملفات مرافقة يعرضها SkillsMP قبل أن تقرر التثبيت.
استنادا إلى تصنيف SOC المهني
التثبيت باستخدام Codex أو Claude انسخ هذا Prompt والصقه في Codex أو Claude أو مساعد آخر ليراجع صفحة Skill ويثبّتها لك.
يتجاوز الأمر المباشر Prompt المخصّص للمراجعة. افحص المصدر قبل تشغيله.
npx skills add https://github.com/adoresever/AGI_Ananas --skill review-prيبقى الأمر في سطر واحد. مرّر أفقيًا لمراجعته كاملًا قبل النسخ.
تفضّل نسخة محلية؟ نزّل الملفات المتاحة حاليًا لدى SkillsMP.
عرض SKILL.md
Match manuscript claims against user-provided literature and produce a traceable claim-evidence table. Use when the user asks to add references, check whether PDFs support manuscript statements, find supporting or opposing evidence from a literature folder, distinguish strong support from background support, or create a 论点-证据匹配 report for an academic draft.
Build or reorganize an academic paper project workspace with clear folders and local instructions for literature, drafts, feedback, extracted text, and output reports. Use when the user wants to set up a论文工作台, organize mixed manuscript materials, create project rules, or prepare a stable workflow before citation checking, evidence matching, reviewer simulation, or manuscript revision.
Simulate a strict academic reviewer and produce a manuscript risk report without editing the draft. Use when the user asks to act as a reviewer, find weaknesses before submission, inspect evidence gaps, check overclaims, evaluate manuscript readiness, combine advisor notes or meeting minutes into revision priorities, or generate a 审稿人模拟检查 report.
| name | review-pr |
| description | Script-first review-only GitHub pull request analysis. Use for deterministic PR review with structured findings handoff to /prepare-pr. |
Perform a read-only review and produce both human and machine-readable outputs.
.worktrees/pr-<PR>.scripts/pr-review <PR>
scripts/pr review-checkout-main <PR>scripts/pr review-checkout-pr <PR>scripts/pr review-guard <PR>
.local/review.md with sections A through J..local/review.json with structured findings.scripts/pr review-validate-artifacts <PR>
scripts/pr-review <PR>
ls -la .local/pr-meta.json .local/pr-meta.env .local/review-context.env .local/review-mode.env
scripts/pr review-checkout-main <PR>
rg -n "<keyword>" -S src extensions apps || true
git log --oneline --all --grep "<keyword>" | head -20
gh_user=$(gh api user --jq .login)
gh pr edit <PR> --add-assignee "$gh_user" || echo "Could not assign reviewer, continuing"
scripts/pr review-checkout-pr <PR>
gh pr diff <PR>
source .local/review-context.env
git diff --stat "$MERGE_BASE"..pr-<PR>
git diff "$MERGE_BASE"..pr-<PR>
Use the wrapper for target validation and executed-test verification:
scripts/pr review-tests <PR> <test-file> [<test-file> ...]
scripts/pr review-artifacts-init <PR>
.local/review.md sections A through J..local/review.json.Minimum JSON shape:
{
"recommendation": "READY FOR /prepare-pr",
"findings": [
{
"id": "F1",
"severity": "IMPORTANT",
"title": "...",
"area": "path/or/component",
"fix": "Actionable fix"
}
],
"tests": {
"ran": [],
"gaps": [],
"result": "pass"
},
"docs": "up_to_date|missing|not_applicable",
"changelog": "required"
}
scripts/pr review-guard <PR>
scripts/pr review-validate-artifacts <PR>