Skip to main content

review-changes

Review changes against file-specific toolkit rules. Trigger for code-review and quality-check requests. Do not trigger when the user asks to generate a project or author coding rules.

معلومات المصدر

المستودع
AgiFlow/aicode-toolkit
آخر نشاط في المصدر
٢٧ سبتمبر ٢٠٢٦ في ٠٨:٢١
لغة SKILL.md المكتشفة
الإنجليزية
النجوم
١٦١
التفرعات
٢٣

خيارات التثبيت

يُحدَّد Prompt الذي يراجع المصدر أولًا بشكل افتراضي. يمكنك التبديل إلى أمر مباشر أو تنزيل نسخة محلية.

مراجعة ملفات المصدر

اقرأ SKILL.md وأي ملفات مرافقة يعرضها SkillsMP قبل أن تقرر التثبيت.

عرض SKILL.md

SKILL.md
تعليمات المصدر · معاينة للقراءة فقط
name
review-changes
description
Review changes against file-specific toolkit rules. Trigger for code-review and quality-check requests. Do not trigger when the user asks to generate a project or author coding rules.
# Review changes using project rules 1. Identify changed files and the consumer workspace. For each file call `review-code-change` with `{ "file_path": "..." }` and inspect its full feedback and returned `rules`. 2. Compare actual source and diff against the applicable rules yourself. An unconfigured backend returns rules for **host-agent review** with `identified_issues: []` and `fix_required: false`; those fields are not evidence of compliance. Missing project, template or RULES.yaml likewise means review could not establish compliance. 3. Report findings with file/line, severity, specific rule, evidence and suggested correction. Explicitly state when rules were missing or a backend could not run. Do not claim that an empty issue list passed review without examining the code. 4. Propose fixes and ask permission before editing; recheck any corrected files. Workspace settings may invoke an external agent backend and incur credentials/cost even without CLI backend flags. Check and explain configured settings before requesting such a review.
عرض على GitHub