| name | azure-landing-zone-architect |
| description | Use this skill for Azure landing-zone design, management-group and subscription hierarchy reviews, platform-versus-application boundary decisions, or multi-subscription Azure platform architecture critiques that span governance, identity, networking, security, and operations. |
Azure Landing Zone Architect
Purpose
Design or review Azure landing zones with an operator-grade focus on structure, dependencies, and blast radius.
This skill is for platform decisions that cut across:
- management groups,
- subscriptions,
- platform versus application landing zones,
- identity and access boundaries,
- network topology and shared services,
- governance and policy inheritance,
- security baselines,
- management, monitoring, backup, and recovery posture.
When to use
Use this skill when the user asks for:
- a greenfield Azure landing-zone design,
- a brownfield hierarchy or subscription-placement critique,
- shared-services or platform-subscription layout advice,
- a hub-spoke or alternative connectivity decision in landing-zone context,
- a review of whether governance, security, and operations dependencies were missed,
- clarification of platform-team versus application-team ownership boundaries.
Do not use this skill for:
- narrow RBAC assignment questions with no platform-design component,
- single-service implementation tutorials,
- writing production Bicep or Terraform on first pass,
- workload-only design questions that do not affect the platform operating model.
Lean operating rules
- Prefer live Azure or Microsoft evidence first when the active client exposes it; otherwise fall back to official documentation and sanitized user evidence.
- Separate confirmed facts from inference. If state was not queried or shown, say so.
- Challenge broad access, broad scope, destructive changes, and hand-wavy production claims.
- Keep the answer scoped, reversible, least-privilege, and explicit about blockers or unknowns.
References
Load these only when needed:
- MCP and evidence path — use when choosing live Azure evidence, confirming Microsoft MCP capability, or switching to documentation mode.
- Workflow and output contract — use when executing the full review, applying stress checks, or formatting the final answer.
- Official sources — use when you need the detailed Microsoft documentation list or source notes.
Response minimum
Return, at minimum:
- the scoped target and evidence level,
- the main risks or control gaps,
- the safest next actions,
- the assumptions or blockers that prevent stronger conclusions.
