security-assessment

namespace	aiwg
name	security-assessment
platforms	["all"]
description	Execute STRIDE threat modeling, vulnerability scanning, and security control validation with risk scoring

security-assessment

Execute threat modeling, vulnerability scanning, and security control validation.

Triggers

Alternate expressions and non-obvious activations (primary phrases are matched automatically from the skill description):

• "STRIDE [component]" → threat model using STRIDE framework
• "OWASP check" → OWASP Top 10 validation
• "SAST" / "DAST" → static/dynamic application security testing
• "CVE scan" → known vulnerability enumeration
• "is the code safe" → colloquial security check
• "pentest prep" → pre-penetration-test readiness

Purpose

This skill orchestrates comprehensive security assessment through:

• STRIDE threat modeling
• Vulnerability pattern detection
• Security control validation
• Compliance verification
• Risk scoring and prioritization

Behavior

When triggered, this skill:

1. Determines scope:

   • Component-level, system-level, or full assessment
   • Identify assets and trust boundaries
   • Load existing threat model if available

2. Executes threat modeling:

   • Dispatch Security Architect for STRIDE analysis
   • Enumerate threats per component
   • Identify attack vectors

3. Runs vulnerability patterns:

   • Dispatch Security Auditor for pattern scanning
   • Check OWASP Top 10
   • Identify secrets exposure risks
   • Review dependency vulnerabilities

4. Validates controls:

   • Dispatch Security Gatekeeper
   • Map controls to threats
   • Verify implementation
   • Check coverage gaps

5. Assesses privacy:

   • Dispatch Privacy Officer (if PII involved)
   • Check data handling
   • Verify consent mechanisms

6. Generates report:

   • Risk-ranked findings
   • CVSS scores where applicable
   • Remediation guidance
   • Compliance status

STRIDE Threat Categories

Category	Description	Example
Spoofing	Impersonating something/someone	Fake user credentials
Tampering	Modifying data or code	SQL injection
Repudiation	Denying actions	Missing audit logs
Information Disclosure	Exposing information	Data leakage
Denial of Service	Disrupting availability	Resource exhaustion
Elevation of Privilege	Gaining unauthorized access	Broken access control

Assessment Flow

┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ 1. SCOPE IDENTIFICATION                                 │
│    • Define assessment boundary                         │
│    • Identify assets (data, services, infrastructure)   │
│    • Map trust boundaries                               │
│    • Load existing threat model (if any)                │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
                          │
                          ▼
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ 2. THREAT MODELING (Security Architect)                 │
│    • Data flow analysis                                 │
│    • STRIDE enumeration per component                   │
│    • Attack vector identification                       │
│    • Trust boundary crossing analysis                   │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
                          │
                          ▼
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ 3. VULNERABILITY SCANNING (Security Auditor)            │
│    • OWASP Top 10 pattern check                         │
│    • Secrets exposure scan                              │
│    • Dependency vulnerability check                     │
│    • Configuration review                               │
│    • Code pattern analysis                              │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
                          │
                          ▼
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ 4. CONTROL VALIDATION (Security Gatekeeper)             │
│    • Map security requirements to controls              │
│    • Verify control implementation                      │
│    • Check control effectiveness                        │
│    • Identify coverage gaps                             │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
                          │
                          ▼
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ 5. PRIVACY ASSESSMENT (Privacy Officer) [if PII]        │
│    • Data inventory review                              │
│    • Consent mechanism validation                       │
│    • Data retention compliance                          │
│    • Cross-border transfer assessment                   │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
                          │
                          ▼
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ 6. RISK SCORING & REPORTING                             │
│    • Calculate CVSS scores                              │
│    • Prioritize by risk (likelihood × impact)           │
│    • Generate remediation guidance                      │
│    • Produce assessment report                          │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘

OWASP Top 10 Checks

#	Category	Patterns Checked
A01	Broken Access Control	RBAC, ABAC, path traversal, CORS
A02	Cryptographic Failures	Weak algorithms, key management, TLS
A03	Injection	SQL, NoSQL, LDAP, OS command, XSS
A04	Insecure Design	Threat modeling gaps, missing controls
A05	Security Misconfiguration	Defaults, unnecessary features, verbose errors
A06	Vulnerable Components	Outdated dependencies, known CVEs
A07	Auth Failures	Password policies, MFA, session management
A08	Data Integrity Failures	CI/CD security, unsigned updates
A09	Logging Failures	Missing logs, sensitive data in logs
A10	SSRF	Internal resource access, URL validation

Severity Scoring

CVSS Base Metrics

severity_levels:
  critical:
    cvss_range: [9.0, 10.0]
    description: Immediate remediation required
    sla: 24 hours

  high:
    cvss_range: [7.0, 8.9]
    description: Remediation within sprint
    sla: 7 days

  medium:
    cvss_range: [4.0, 6.9]
    description: Plan remediation
    sla: 30 days

  low:
    cvss_range: [0.1, 3.9]
    description: Address as time permits
    sla: 90 days

  informational:
    cvss_range: [0.0, 0.0]
    description: Awareness only
    sla: none

Assessment Report Format

# Security Assessment Report

**Date**: 2025-12-08
**Scope**: Full System Assessment
**Assessors**: security-architect, security-auditor, security-gatekeeper

## Executive Summary

| Severity | Count |
|----------|-------|
| Critical | 0 |
| High | 2 |
| Medium | 5 |
| Low | 8 |
| Informational | 3 |

**Overall Risk Level**: MEDIUM
**Recommendation**: Address high-severity findings before production deployment

## Threat Model Summary

### Trust Boundaries
1. External → API Gateway
2. API Gateway → Internal Services
3. Services → Database

### STRIDE Analysis

| Component | S | T | R | I | D | E | Total |
|-----------|---|---|---|---|---|---|-------|
| API Gateway | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 6 |
| Auth Service | 3 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 9 |
| Data Service | 1 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 9 |

## Findings

### HIGH-001: Insufficient Input Validation
- **Severity**: High (CVSS 7.5)
- **Component**: API Gateway
- **Category**: A03 Injection
- **Description**: User input not sanitized before database query
- **Impact**: SQL injection possible, data exfiltration risk
- **Remediation**: Implement parameterized queries, add input validation
- **Status**: Open

### HIGH-002: Missing Rate Limiting
- **Severity**: High (CVSS 7.2)
- **Component**: API Gateway
- **Category**: A05 Denial of Service
- **Description**: No rate limiting on authentication endpoints
 : Brute force attacks, credential stuffing
 : Implement rate limiting, add account lockout
 : Open


...



| Control | Requirement | Status | Gap |
|---------|-------------|--------|-----|
| Authentication | MFA for privileged users | ✅ Implemented | None |
| Authorization | RBAC with least privilege | ⚠️ Partial | Admin role too broad |
| Encryption | TLS 1.2+ for transit | ✅ Implemented | None |
| Encryption | AES-256 at rest | ⚠️ Partial | Logs not encrypted |
| Logging | Security event logging | ✅ Implemented | None |
| Monitoring | Real-time alerting | ❌ Missing | Not configured |



| Framework | Status | Gaps |
|-----------|--------|------|
| OWASP Top 10 | 7/10 compliant | A03, A05, A09 |
| SOC 2 | Partial | Monitoring, encryption |
| GDPR | Compliant | None identified |




 [ ] Fix SQL injection vulnerability (HIGH-001)
 [ ] Implement rate limiting (HIGH-002)


 [ ] Reduce admin role permissions
 [ ] Encrypt log storage
 [ ] Configure monitoring alerts


 [ ] Address medium-severity findings
 [ ] Complete SOC 2 gap remediation



Recommended: 30 days or after major changes

Usage Examples

Full Assessment

User: "Run security review"

Skill orchestrates:
1. Load current architecture
2. Run STRIDE analysis
3. Scan for OWASP patterns
4. Validate controls
5. Generate report

Output:
"Security Assessment Complete

Findings: 0 Critical, 2 High, 5 Medium, 8 Low
Risk Level: MEDIUM

Blocking Issues:
- HIGH-001: SQL injection risk
- HIGH-002: Missing rate limiting

Report: .aiwg/security/assessment-20251208.md"

Component Assessment

User: "Threat model the authentication service"

Skill focuses on:
- Auth service components only
- STRIDE for auth flows
- Auth-specific vulnerabilities
- Control validation for auth

Output: Targeted threat model and findings

Control Validation Only

User: "Validate security controls"

Skill runs:
- Control mapping
- Implementation verification
- Gap analysis

Output: Control assessment summary

Integration

This skill uses:

• parallel-dispatch: Launch security agents concurrently
• project-awareness: Get architecture and component info
• artifact-metadata: Track assessment artifacts

Agent Orchestration

agents:
  threat_modeling:
    agent: security-architect
    focus: STRIDE analysis, attack vectors, trust boundaries

  vulnerability_scanning:
    agent: security-auditor
    focus: OWASP patterns, secrets, dependencies, configuration

  control_validation:
    agent: security-gatekeeper
    focus: Control mapping, implementation, effectiveness

  privacy_assessment:
    agent: privacy-officer
    focus: PII handling, consent, retention, transfers
    condition: has_pii == true

Output Locations

• Assessment report: .aiwg/security/assessment-{date}.md
• Threat model: .aiwg/security/threat-model.md
• Control matrix: .aiwg/security/control-matrix.md
• Findings tracker: .aiwg/security/findings/

References

• STRIDE methodology: Microsoft Threat Modeling
• OWASP Top 10: https://owasp.org/Top10/
• CVSS Calculator: https://www.first.org/cvss/calculator/3.1
• Security templates: templates/security/