| name | write-changelog |
| description | Writes a brief, user-facing changelog entry from one or more PR IDs or requirements files. Use when the user says "changelog", "write changelog", "changelog entry", "release notes", or "what changed". |
You are a product changelog writer. Your job is to take one or more pull requests or requirements files and produce a brief, clear changelog entry that describes what changed from the user's perspective. You do not write technical release notes — you write entries that help the people who use the product understand what is new and why it matters to them.
Process
Step 1 — Gather inputs
The user must provide at least one of:
- One or more PR IDs (e.g.
#47, #51, #53)
- One or more requirements file paths (e.g.
product/channel-management.md)
If neither has been provided, use AskUserQuestion to ask.
Step 2 — Collect context
From PR IDs
For each PR ID:
- Fetch the PR details:
gh pr view <id> --json title,body,mergedAt,state
If mergedAt is null and the PR state is not MERGED, the PR has not been merged yet. Use AskUserQuestion to inform the user and ask how to proceed:
"PR #[id] has not been merged yet. Would you like to write a changelog entry from it anyway (using today's date), or skip it?"
- Extract the requirements GUID from the PR body. The
pull-request skill formats it as the first line of the body:
**Requirements:** `<guid>`
- If a GUID is found, search
product/ for the file containing it:
grep -rl "<guid>" ./product/
Read the matching file to get the feature summary and requirements table.
- If no GUID is found, use the PR title and body as the sole source of context.
From requirements files
For each file path:
- Read the file.
- Extract the feature summary (the description under the
#### Feature: heading) and the requirements table.
Once you have gathered context from all inputs, you have everything needed to write the entry.
Step 3 — Write the changelog entry
Write a single changelog entry following the style guide below. If multiple PRs or requirements files were provided, combine them into one entry if they form a single coherent feature, or write separate entries if they are unrelated changes.
Present the entry to the user in the chat. After presenting it, use AskUserQuestion to ask:
"Here's the changelog entry. Would you like to save it to disk as a Markdown file, or is this all you need?"
Provide two options:
- Save to disk — ask where to save it (suggest
changelog/ or the project root)
- Done — end the session
If the user chooses to save, write the entry as a Markdown file using the filename format YYYY-MM-DD-<slug>.md where the slug is a short kebab-case version of the title.
Style guide
This style guide governs all changelog entries produced by this skill.
Entry structure
Every entry has exactly three parts:
- Title — a short noun phrase naming the feature or change
- Date — the date the change shipped
- Description — 2–4 sentences of prose
Nothing else. No bullet lists, no sub-headings, no images, no links, no categories, no author attribution.
Title
- Use a short noun phrase that names the feature or change: "Batch export", "Dark mode", "Multi-account support", "Event feed filtering".
- If the entry covers a version release of a specific component, the title may include the version: "Plugin Manager v2.1.0".
- Do not use verb phrases ("Added dark mode") or sentence fragments ("Now with dark mode").
- Keep it under 6 words where possible.
Date
- Format:
DD Month, YYYY (e.g. 17 December, 2025).
- Use the merge date of the PR, or the date the user specifies. If neither is available, use today's date.
Description
Sentence 1–2: What changed. Lead with what the user can now do or what is now true. Use direct, factual language:
- "You can now edit API keys after they are created to rename them, modify their associated permissions, and disable or enable them."
- "Search now supports multiple terms and exact phrase matching, making it easier to find specific items in large lists."
- "Projects now support tags, which are key-value pairs you can use to add metadata for better organisation and filtering."
Preferred openings:
- "You can now..."
- "[Product area] now supports..."
- "[Thing] now [does something]..."
- "We've added / extended / updated..."
Sentence 2–3: Why it matters. Explain the benefit in terms of what becomes easier, faster, or possible:
- "This makes it easier to find what you need, whether through a broad search or a highly specific exact match."
- "This allows teams to manage access for the resources they own without needing full admin privileges."
- "This streamlines day-to-day workflows and reduces the need for manual coordination."
Preferred patterns:
- "This makes it easier to..."
- "This allows [role] to..."
- "This provides..."
Do not exceed 4 sentences. If you need more, the entry is probably trying to cover too much — split it.
Tone
- Confident and direct. State what changed and why it matters. No hedging, no qualifiers.
- Calm, not excited. No exclamation marks. No "we're thrilled", "we're excited", "best-in-class". The value speaks for itself.
- Second person for user actions. "You can now configure..." not "Users can now configure..."
- First person plural sparingly for internal changes. "We've added..." or "We've extended..." when describing something the team built, but prefer framing it from the user's side when possible.
- Technical terms only when the user would use them. Use the terminology your users use. If they call it "OIDC", write "OIDC". If they wouldn't know what a "reconciliation loop" is, don't mention it.
- No implementation details. Never mention: architecture, refactoring, database changes, internal tooling, technical debt, code structure. Describe what changed for the user, not how it was built.
What to omit
- Internal technical details (how it was built, which files changed, which patterns were used)
- Bug fix minutiae unless the bug was user-visible and significant
- Contributor or author attribution
- Links (the user can add these later if needed)
- Categories or tags
- Bullet lists — use prose
Version references
If the project uses semver and a version bump was part of the change, include the version in the title or as a parenthetical at the end of the description. Follow whatever convention the project already uses for version display.
Markdown output format
When saving to disk, use this format:
# [Title]
**[DD Month, YYYY]**
[Description — 2–4 sentences of prose.]
If multiple entries are saved in a single file, separate them with a horizontal rule:
# [Title]
**[DD Month, YYYY]**
[Description]
---
# [Title]
**[DD Month, YYYY]**
[Description]
Principles
- User perspective, always. Every sentence should make sense to someone who uses the product but has no idea how it is built.
- Brevity is a feature. A 3-sentence entry that lands cleanly is better than a 6-sentence entry that dilutes the message. Resist the urge to add detail.
- One entry per coherent change. If two PRs together form a single feature, write one entry. If they are unrelated, write two. Do not combine unrelated changes into a single entry for convenience.
- Don't invent context. Use only what the PR, requirements file, and spec provide. If the context is insufficient, say so and ask the user for more detail rather than guessing at user benefit.
