القائمة
Design quality rubric scoring — evaluates implementation against design doc on 4 dimensions
يُحدَّد Prompt الذي يراجع المصدر أولًا بشكل افتراضي. يمكنك التبديل إلى أمر مباشر أو تنزيل نسخة محلية.
اقرأ SKILL.md وأي ملفات مرافقة يعرضها SkillsMP قبل أن تقرر التثبيت.
التثبيت باستخدام Codex أو Claude انسخ هذا Prompt والصقه في Codex أو Claude أو مساعد آخر ليراجع صفحة Skill ويثبّتها لك.
يتجاوز الأمر المباشر Prompt المخصّص للمراجعة. افحص المصدر قبل تشغيله.
npx skills add https://github.com/ansonphong/meta-dev --skill design-evalيبقى الأمر في سطر واحد. مرّر أفقيًا لمراجعته كاملًا قبل النسخ.
تفضّل نسخة محلية؟ نزّل الملفات المتاحة حاليًا لدى SkillsMP.
Structured, report-only review across correctness, safety, patterns, coverage, and scope with host-native reviewer routing.
Consult Fable 5 before escalating a judgment call to the human. Use when a long-horizon or autonomous run hits a hard architecture / design / implementation-taste decision it would otherwise stop and ask the human approver about. Fable answers with a recommendation, a confidence score, and a falsifier; a verdict that clears 0.90 AND carries evidence is adopted and logged, anything weaker escalates to the human with Fable's recommendation as the lead option. Safety-class decisions (destructive, deploy, security, money, schema, cross-repo) never route here — they always reach the human.
The shared host-neutral execute→review→fix loop: fresh scoped workers, focused causal verification, durable commits, and one native phase review.
استنادا إلى تصنيف SOC المهني
عرض SKILL.md
| name | design-eval |
| description | Design quality rubric scoring — evaluates implementation against design doc on 4 dimensions |
Scores an implementation against its design doc on 4 dimensions. Reads the design doc path from bash scripts/config-get.sh meta_dev.paths.design_doc.
Each dimension scored 1-10:
| Score | Label | Criteria |
|---|---|---|
| 9-10 | A | Design-accurate; minor acceptable deviations documented |
| 7-8 | B | Close match; a few deviations but no user-visible regressions |
| 5-6 | C | Noticeable deviations; some design specs missed |
| 3-4 | D | Major deviations; significant rework needed |
| 1-2 | F | Does not match design; needs full reimplementation |
## Design Quality Evaluation
| Dimension | Score | Weight | Weighted |
|-----------|-------|--------|----------|
| Visual Accuracy | X/10 | 30% | X.X |
| Interaction Fidelity | X/10 | 25% | X.X |
| Component Consistency | X/10 | 25% | X.X |
| Accessibility | X/10 | 20% | X.X |
| **Overall** | | | **X.X/10 (Grade X)** |
### Findings
- [severity] file:line — description