daily-qa

name	daily-qa
version	1.0.0
description	Daily repo health check — scans recent commits, CI failures, dependency drift, performance regressions, and untested code paths. Produces a grounded report with evidence-only findings and minimal, scoped fixes. Use when asked to "run daily QA", "daily repo check", "morning standup for the repo", "daily health report", or "check recent commits for bugs".
triggers	["daily qa","daily repo check","daily repo qa","morning repo check","daily health report","check recent commits for bugs","daily ci review"]
argument-hint	<optional: since timestamp, e.g. "24h", "last-run", "2026-06-01">
allowed-tools	["Bash","Read","Grep","Glob","Task","WebFetch"]

/daily-qa

A daily, evidence-grounded sweep across the repo: recent commits, CI signals, dependency drift, performance regressions, and test coverage gaps. Output is a short report with observed vs suspected clearly separated, plus the smallest viable fixes.

Hard rules (apply to every section)

• Ground every claim in concrete repo evidence: commit SHAs, PR numbers, file paths, diff hunks, failing test names, CI job IDs, log snippets, lockfile entries, benchmark numbers, or trace IDs.
• If evidence is weak or missing, say so and skip — do not invent findings, do not speculate root causes, do not guess version numbers.
• Separate "observed" from "suspected" in every section.
• Prefer the smallest safe fix. No refactors, no unrelated cleanup, no opportunistic renames.
• Scope stays tight to the changed/affected areas. If a finding requires broader work, flag it as a follow-up — do not expand scope inline.

Step 1: Establish the window

Determine the time window for "recent":

1. If the user passed $ARGUMENTS, use it (24h, last-run, ISO date, etc.).
2. Else check .daily-qa-last-run at the repo root — if present, use its timestamp as the lower bound.
3. Else default to last 24 hours.

Record the resolved window at the top of the report.

After the report is written, update .daily-qa-last-run to the current timestamp so the next run picks up cleanly. (Add to .gitignore if not already present; do not commit it.)

Step 2: CI failures and flaky tests

Goal: summarize CI failures in the window; group by likely root cause; suggest top fixes. (Run this before the commit bug scan so the bug scan in Step 3 can cross-reference live test/CI signal.)

1. Try, in order:
   • gh run list --limit 50 --json databaseId,conclusion,headSha,createdAt,name,workflowName and filter to the window.
   • If gh unavailable, look for local CI artifacts: .github/workflows/ to identify jobs, then gh per-PR or repo-specific CI tooling mentioned in CLAUDE.md.
2. For each failed run, fetch the log of the failing step (gh run view <id> --log-failed) and extract:
   • failing test name(s) or build step
   • the actual error message (verbatim, in a code block)
   • the workflow + job + step path
3. Flaky detection: a test is flaky if it fails on one run and passes on another for the same SHA, or if its failure message includes timing/race/network strings. Cite the two runs.
4. Group findings by likely root cause (compile error, env/secret drift, network/flake, assertion change, snapshot stale). Mark each group Observed (proven by logs) or Suspected (pattern match only).
5. Suggest top 1–3 fixes, each with a concrete file path or test name.

If CI is unreachable, write: "CI signals unavailable — skipped" and the reason (no gh, no token, no remote).

Step 3: Recent-commit bug scan

Goal: surface likely bugs introduced in the window; propose minimal fixes.

1. git log --since=<window> --oneline --no-merges → list candidate SHAs and resolve the window's commit range (oldest..HEAD within the window).
2. Primary engine — delegate to /code-review. Run /code-review scoped to the window's diff/range at a local tier:
   • low/medium for a quick daily pass; high when the window is large (>30 commits) or touches auth/crypto/payments/data paths.
   • /code-review reads the diff only — no browser, no external tools, no auth prompt — so it is safe to auto-run, exactly like /defense.
   • The ultra tier is cloud-based, billed, and user-triggered — never auto-run it. Recommend it (see §7f) only when a finding here is high-stakes and warrants a deep multi-agent cloud review. Fold /code-review's correctness findings into report §2.
3. Fallback (only if /code-review is unavailable): read the diff hunks that touch logic (skip pure docs/config-only changes unless they touch build/CI config) and look for concrete bug signatures only:
   • off-by-one, inverted conditions, swapped args, dropped error handling, unhandled null/undefined, race-prone async, accidental await removal, resource leaks, missing cleanup, regex backtracking, SQL with missing parameter binding, auth/permission checks removed.
4. Cross-reference findings with failing tests or CI jobs from Step 2 — if a commit coincides with a new failure, escalate confidence.
5. For each finding, output:
   • SHA + file:line evidence
   • Observed (what the diff actually does)
   • Suspected impact (only if you can name a concrete failure mode)
   • Minimal fix (the smallest diff that addresses it)

If no findings appear, write: "No bug-signature findings in window — N commits scanned." — do not fill space with speculation.

/code-review already fans out internally; only delegate a separate wide scan to an Explore subagent if /code-review is unavailable and the window spans

30 commits.

Step 4: Dependency / SDK drift

Goal: detect outdated deps and propose a minimal alignment plan with explicit current → target versions taken from the repo.

1. Identify package manifests + lockfiles present:
   • package.json / package-lock.json / pnpm-lock.yaml / yarn.lock
   • pyproject.toml / poetry.lock / requirements.txt / uv.lock
   • Gemfile.lock, go.mod/go.sum, Cargo.toml/Cargo.lock, etc.
2. Pull current versions directly from the lockfile (not the manifest range). If no lockfile, say so and stop — do not invent versions.
3. Determine target versions only via a reproducible source:
   • npm outdated --json, pnpm outdated --format json, pip list --outdated --format=json, cargo outdated, etc.
   • If the tool is unavailable, list deps as "target unknown" and do not guess.
4. Group findings:
   • Safe patch/minor (no breaking changes per changelog)
   • Minor with caveats (deprecations noted)
   • Major (explicitly call out breaking-change risk + required migration steps; cite the upstream changelog URL only if fetched via WebFetch)
   • SDK drift (e.g., @anthropic-ai/sdk, openai, cloud SDKs) — prioritize these, list any pinned model IDs or APIs that may need updating.
5. Propose the smallest viable upgrade set: prefer one cohesive bump per group over many. Mark all target versions as Suggestion unless they came from an explicit upstream pin in the repo.

Step 5: Performance / benchmark regression

Goal: compare recent changes to existing benchmarks/traces; flag regressions.

1. Look for benchmark or trace artifacts:
   • benchmark/, bench/, perf/, *.bench.* test files
   • CI artifacts containing timings, flamegraphs, or criterion/pytest-benchmark output
   • traces stored under traces/ or referenced in CLAUDE.md
2. If found, diff the latest run's numbers against the previous baseline for files touched in the window (the changed-file list from Step 3). Report each regression as:
   • metric name, baseline, current, delta %, commit SHA suspected
3. If no benchmarks/traces exist for the touched code paths, write: "No measurements found for: ". Suggest 1–2 specific things to measure next (e.g., "add a microbench for X.foo — hot path per commit abc123"). Do not estimate impact without numbers.

For deeper analysis on a single hotspot, recommend the user run /perf-profile or /db-optimize.

Step 6: Untested-path detection

Goal: identify code paths added/changed in the window that lack tests; draft small, focused tests.

1. For each file changed in the window, locate its test file via repo convention (sibling *.test.*, parallel tests/ tree, etc.).
2. Use coverage data if available (coverage/, lcov.info, .coverage). If absent, fall back to a structural check: new exported functions / new branches in if/switch / new error paths without a corresponding assertion in any test file.
3. For each gap, draft one small test that:
   • fails on the pre-change code (cite the prior SHA)
   • passes on the current code
   • touches only the changed surface — no broad refactors of test setup
4. Do not create PRs automatically. If the user has a yeet-style draft-PR tool wired up, suggest the exact command; otherwise output the test files as a code block and let the user apply them.

This step is a report-only draft — it never applies the tests it drafts. To actually close the gaps found here — including edge/corner cases and past-regression coverage beyond what a single drafted test covers — recommend /test-coverage, which writes and applies the missing tests and enforces Google's Testing on the Toilet best practices on them.

If pursuing TDD-style follow-up, recommend /tdd. To verify a fix actually works in the running app, recommend /verify.

Step 7: Scoped deep-dives (triggered)

After Steps 2–6 produce the changed-file list for the window, decide per-section whether to invoke a heavier command on the narrowed scope. The goal is high-signal automation without daily noise.

7a. /db-optimize — auto-run if triggered

Trigger when changed files match any of:

• ORM models, migrations, query builders (e.g. **/models/**, **/migrations/**, **/queries/**, **/*repository*, **/*.sql)
• raw SQL strings introduced in the diff (grep -E "SELECT|INSERT|UPDATE|DELETE" on diff)
• new ORM calls (.find, .where, .includes, .join, .preload, etc.) in the diff

Action: invoke /db-optimize scoped to the matched files only. Fold its findings into the report under §4a "DB hotspots (auto-run)". If no trigger matched: skip silently (don't even mention it).

7b. /defense — always auto-run (basic OWASP sweep)

/defense is the OWASP Top 10 / secrets / auth / crypto / data-protection review. It reads code only — no external tools, no auth prompt — so it's safe to run on every daily-qa.

Action: invoke /defense scoped to all files changed in the window (not the whole repo — keep it fast and signal-dense). If zero code files changed, skip.

Fold findings into the report under §4b "OWASP / defense (auto-run)" with severity (CRITICAL / HIGH / MEDIUM / LOW) and file:line references as /defense produces them. Only include CRITICAL and HIGH in the executive summary; MEDIUM and LOW go in the report body.

7c. /pentest — recommend only (do not auto-run)

/pentest uses the external clearwing scanner — requires LLM provider config, network/source authorization confirmation, and is much slower. Wrong shape for unattended daily runs.

Recommend /pentest when any of:

• /defense flagged CRITICAL or HIGH in §4b
• dependency manifest changes in Step 4 introduced unfamiliar packages
• auth, crypto, session, token, deserialization, or file-upload code paths changed in the window
• infrastructure / deploy config changed (Dockerfile, docker-compose*, **/*.tf, k8s/helm manifests, .github/workflows/**, nginx/caddy/cloud config) — a commonly-forgotten attack surface (exposed ports, broad IAM, baked-in secrets). /iac-scan (§7i) auto-runs the static misconfig scan and /defense (§4b) sweeps for secrets; recommend /pentest only as the deeper live probe when those surface HIGH/CRITICAL.

Output the exact command (/pentest) plus the scoped path list. User confirms authorization and runs it themselves.

7d. /qa — recommend only (do not auto-run)

/qa launches a browser session and applies fixes interactively — wrong shape for an unattended daily sweep. Instead, recommend it when:

• changed files include UI/frontend code (**/*.tsx, **/*.vue, **/components/**, route handlers serving HTML)
• Step 3 (bug scan) surfaced a bug-signature finding in a user-facing path
• Step 2 (CI) surfaced a failing e2e/browser test

Output the exact command the user should run, e.g. /qa --scope src/components/Checkout.tsx (use the project's actual flag/syntax — check skills/qa/SKILL.md if unsure).

7e. /web-perf — recommend only (do not auto-run)

/web-perf uses Chrome DevTools MCP to measure Core Web Vitals (LCP, INP, CLS) and trace render-blocking resources, layout shifts, and network dependency chains against a live running app. It requires the chrome-devtools MCP server and a URL to hit — wrong shape for unattended runs, but high-signal when frontend code changed.

Trigger — recommend when any of:

• changed files include frontend code (**/*.tsx, **/*.jsx, **/*.vue, **/*.svelte, **/components/**, **/pages/**, **/styles/**, **/*.css, **/*.scss, layout/routing files)
• new images, fonts, or static assets added in the diff
• next.config.*, vite.config.*, webpack.config.*, or other bundler config changed (can affect bundle size and load time)
• Step 3 (bug scan) surfaced a bug-signature in a render path or data-fetching hook

Output — recommend the exact command:

/web-perf

Include the list of changed frontend files so the user can scope the audit to the affected routes. If the project has a local dev URL (check CLAUDE.md or common config like package.json "dev" script), include it as context: e.g. "Run /web-perf against http://localhost:3000 — changed files: src/components/Hero.tsx, app/page.tsx".

7f. /cso — recommend only (threat-model backstop)

/cso is OWASP Top 10 + STRIDE threat modeling — a design-time activity whose real home is /write-plan. daily-qa is post-merge, so this is only a backstop: it catches a trust-boundary change that shipped without a threat model.

Recommend /cso when a commit in the window introduces a new trust boundary and the commit/PR shows no sign threat modeling happened:

• new auth/authz flow, new public endpoint, new external integration or webhook
• new deserialization, file upload, or handling of PII/payments/credentials
• a new service-to-service or cross-tenant path

Output the exact command and note: "threat modeling belongs at plan time (/write-plan → /cso) — run it now if it was skipped." Don't recommend it for changes that cross no trust boundary.

7g. /design-audit — recommend only (visual + accessibility), alongside /qa

Visual consistency, hierarchy, AI-slop tells, and accessibility are an easily-forgotten layer. For any frontend feature, the design pass belongs alongside the functional pass: recommend /design-audit (read-only visual

• a11y audit → design plan) together with /qa (§7d, functional browser QA) — does it look right + does it work. Trigger when changed files include UI (**/*.tsx, **/*.jsx, **/*.vue, **/*.svelte, **/components/**, **/pages/**, **/styles/**, **/*.css). Output both commands scoped to the changed UI files, and pair with /web-perf (§7e) — together they cover work + perf + a11y + visual.

/design-audit only finds and plans (read-only). To fix what it flags, recommend /design-review as the follow-up — it edits source and commits atomically, so the user runs it deliberately, not as part of the sweep.

7h. /a11y — recommend only (screen reader + WCAG)

Accessibility regressions are silent — they don't fail a build, they fail a screen-reader or keyboard user. /a11y's dynamic pass needs a running app (wrong shape for an unattended sweep), so recommend it — but only on heavy frontend changes likely to break assistive tech, not every style tweak. Trigger when the window's UI diff touches any of:

• new/changed interactive components (buttons, menus, dialogs, tabs, comboboxes)
• forms (inputs, labels, validation/error messaging)
• ARIA / role= / tabindex / focus or keyboard handling (onKeyDown, focus())
• images/icons (alt text) or color/contrast changes conveying state
• motion / animation (autoplay, transitions, parallax — reduced-motion)

(See /a11y's trigger section for the authoritative list.) Output /a11y scoped to the changed UI files, alongside the /design-audit + /qa recommendations (§7g, §7d). Skip it for pure spacing/copy CSS changes.

7i. /iac-scan — auto-run if triggered (infra misconfig)

Trigger when changed files include infrastructure/deploy config: Dockerfile, docker-compose*, *.tf/*.tfvars, Kubernetes/Helm manifests, .github/workflows/**, Jenkinsfile, nginx/cloud config.

Action: invoke /iac-scan scoped to the matched infra files — it's static and read-only (uses tfsec/checkov/hadolint/actionlint if installed, signature checks otherwise), so it's safe to auto-run like /defense. Fold findings into the report under §4c "Infra misconfig (auto-run /iac-scan)" with severity and file:line. Only CRITICAL/HIGH go in the executive summary. If no infra files changed, skip silently. For a deeper live probe after HIGH/CRITICAL, recommend /pentest (§7c).

7j. Other related commands — recommend only

• /code-review ultra — when Step 3's local /code-review (or a CI failure) surfaced a high-stakes correctness concern that warrants a deep multi-agent cloud review. The ultra tier is billed and user-triggered, so never auto-run it — output the exact command and let the user launch it.
• /review — staff-level production-readiness review; heavier and more architectural than the Step 3 /code-review pass. Recommend when a commit in the window is architecturally significant or touches a critical path.
• /debug — when Step 2 (CI) or Step 3 (bug scan) has a single high-value failure to root-cause.
• /perf-profile — when Step 5 flags a regression but lacks measurements.
• /verify — when a fix from this report is ready to confirm.
• /tdd — when expanding Step 6 coverage into a real feature.
• /test-coverage — writes and applies the tests Step 6 only drafts; recommend when the untested-path list is worth closing now rather than just noting.
• /finish-branch / /ship — when a fix is ready to land.

Step 8: Report format

Write to daily-qa-reports/YYYY-MM-DD.md (create the directory if needed; add to .gitignore if appropriate). Structure:

# Daily QA — <YYYY-MM-DD>

Window: <from> → <to>
Commits scanned: N
CI runs scanned: N

## 1. CI failures & flaky tests
- Observed failures: …
- Suspected flakes: …
- Top fixes: …

## 2. Recent-commit bug scan (auto-run /code-review)
- Observed: …
- Suspected: …
- (or) No findings.

## 3. Dependency / SDK drift
- Safe bumps: …
- Major bumps (breaking risk): …
- SDK drift: …

## 4. Performance regressions
- Observed: …
- No-measurement gaps: …

### 4a. DB hotspots (auto-run /db-optimize)
- (only if triggered; otherwise omit section)

### 4b. OWASP / defense (auto-run /defense)
- CRITICAL: …
- HIGH: …
- MEDIUM / LOW: …
- (omit subsection only if no code files changed)

### 4c. Infra misconfig (auto-run /iac-scan)
- CRITICAL / HIGH: …
- (only if infra/deploy config changed; otherwise omit section)

## 5. Untested paths
- Drafted tests: file paths + summary
- Coverage gaps without drafts: …

## Recommended next actions
1. …
2. …

## Recommended follow-up commands
- `/code-review ultra` — (only if Step 3 found a high-stakes correctness concern)
- `/review` — (only if a change is architecturally significant / critical-path)
  — (only if a trust-boundary change shipped without a threat model)
  — (only if frontend files changed; include affected routes and dev URL)
  +  — (only if UI changed; visual/a11y audit alongside functional QA)
  — (only if heavy UI likely to affect screen-reader/keyboard/contrast)
  — (to fix what / flag; mutates + commits)
  — (only if /defense or /iac-scan found CRITICAL/HIGH, or auth/crypto changed — NOT on a bare infra change; /iac-scan §4c already covers that statically)
  — (only if UI changed or e2e tests failed)
  — (only if Step 6's untested-path list is worth closing now; writes and applies the drafted tests)

Print the report path and a 5-line executive summary to the chat. Update .daily-qa-last-run.

Anti-patterns (do not do)

• Listing "potential issues" without a SHA, file, log line, or version.
• Proposing a refactor because the code "could be cleaner."
• Guessing a target dep version because "x.y.z is probably current."
• Claiming a perf regression without a measurement to back it.
• Opening PRs or pushing branches as part of this command.
• Bundling unrelated fixes into one finding.

Related commands

Auto-invoked (local, diff-only — no external tools or auth prompt, safe for daily):

• /code-review — the engine of the Step 3 commit bug scan (local low/medium/high tiers); findings populate report §2.
• /defense — always run on changed files (basic OWASP / secrets / auth / crypto sweep).
• /iac-scan — when infra/deploy config changed (static misconfig scan); findings populate §4c.
• /db-optimize — when DB/ORM/SQL files changed.

Recommend-only (never auto-run):

• /code-review ultra — deep multi-agent cloud review; billed + user-triggered. Recommend when Step 3 surfaces a high-stakes correctness concern.
• /review — staff-level production-readiness review; recommend for architecturally significant / critical-path changes (heavier than the Step 3 /code-review).
• /cso — OWASP+STRIDE threat modeling; design-time (home is /write-plan). Backstop-recommend when a trust-boundary change shipped without a threat model.
• /pentest — heavy external scanner (clearwing) with auth confirmation; recommend when /defense or /iac-scan finds HIGH/CRITICAL, or sensitive code paths changed (a bare infra change is handled statically by auto-run /iac-scan §7i — pentest is only the deeper live probe on HIGH/CRITICAL).
• /qa — interactive browser QA; recommend when UI changed.
• /web-perf — Core Web Vitals + render trace against a live app (Chrome DevTools MCP); recommend when frontend files, assets, or bundler config changed.
• /design-audit — read-only visual/a11y audit → design plan; recommend alongside /qa when UI changed.
• /a11y — WCAG / screen-reader / keyboard audit; recommend on heavy UI changes likely to affect assistive tech (dynamic pass needs a dev URL).
• /design-review — fixes and commits visual issues (mutates); recommend as the follow-up to apply what /design-audit//a11y flags.
• /debug — root-cause investigation for a specific failure.
• /perf-profile — drill into a perf regression flagged in Step 5.
• /verify — confirm a proposed fix works in the running app.
• /tdd — write the failing test first when expanding Step 6 coverage.
• /test-coverage — writes and applies the missing unit/integration/e2e tests that Step 6 only drafts as a report; the fixer counterpart, and the same relationship it has to /qa-full Step 9.
• /finish-branch / /ship — when a fix from this report is ready to land.