Skip to main content

twg-operational-health

Use with the root `twg` skill for on-call handoffs, incident response and investigation, post-incident reviews, reliability reviews, Assets refresh, capacity views, meeting summaries, and operational risk readouts.

الانتقال إلى التثبيت

معلومات المصدر

المستودع
atlassian/twg-cli
آخر نشاط في المصدر
١٠ سبتمبر ٢٠٢٦ في ٢١:٠٩
لغة SKILL.md المكتشفة
الإنجليزية
النجوم
١٧
التفرعات
١

خيارات التثبيت

يُحدَّد Prompt الذي يراجع المصدر أولًا بشكل افتراضي. يمكنك التبديل إلى أمر مباشر أو تنزيل نسخة محلية.

مراجعة ملفات المصدر

اقرأ SKILL.md وأي ملفات مرافقة يعرضها SkillsMP قبل أن تقرر التثبيت.

مستكشف الملفات
6 ملفات

عرض SKILL.md

SKILL.md
تعليمات المصدر · معاينة للقراءة فقط
name
twg-operational-health
description
Use with the root `twg` skill for on-call handoffs, incident response and investigation, post-incident reviews, reliability reviews, Assets refresh, capacity views, meeting summaries, and operational risk readouts.
# twg-operational-health Use together with the root `twg` skill. Exact command grammar comes from live `twg help` or `twg help describe <path>`. ## CLI launcher fallback Run `twg <command>`. On shell `command not found`, use `$HOME/.local/bin/twg` (macOS/Linux) / `$env:LOCALAPPDATA\Programs\twg\bin\twg.exe` (PowerShell), then tell user to add that directory to PATH. Do not treat auth or command errors as PATH failures. ## Use When - "I'm taking over on-call" - "Reliability, incident, SEV, or post-incident review readout" - "Investigate an active incident and find mitigation" - "Analyze root cause or draft postmortem/PIR learning/action items" - "Open risks, blockers, overloaded people, operational health" ## First Move Resolve scope, window, anchors, owner/escalation path, status, recency, and follow-ups. Find the operational anchor before joining relevant surfaces. Run without `--site`; TWG inherits the user's pinned Jira/JSM site. Only add a site override when the user explicitly requests another tenant. Never assume a vendor-internal incident site. ## Evidence Policy - Rank by impact, urgency, owner clarity, recurrence risk, and actionability; separate live risks from historical mentions. - Cluster compact incident, PIR, follow-up, runbook, owner, asset, or meeting evidence by service, theme, owner, and recency. Hydrate highest-risk clusters; stop once theme, owner signal, and confidence are clear. - Separate `working theory`, `confirmed problem`, `mitigation`, and `root cause`. Require a causal mechanism for confirmed root cause; a closed record is insufficient. Mark claims `confirmed`, `supported`, `candidate`, or `missing evidence`; use references for RCA details. - After one correction of a repeated backend, auth, or schema error, report the gap and use remaining evidence instead of nearby aliases or broad inventories. - Read build health from `bitbucket pipeline query`, not `pipeline get` per pipeline; reserve that for failures whose logs or test reports change the pattern, owner, or action. `query` lists recent runs only (`--limit` default 15), so raise it and state the span covered. Hydrate ranked sets through one batched `get`. ## Recipe Cards ### Leadership Reliability Review / On-Call Handoff Load `references/reliability-review.md`. Resolve leader, platform, and window; cluster supported themes, separate cause from mitigation, connect prevention work, and rank leadership actions. For handoffs, add a first-hour checklist and escalation map. ### Incident Investigation / Mitigation Use when the incident is active, newly mitigated, or pre-PIR. Anchor on the incident record, then pull responders, symptoms, impact, recent deploys/flags/config, topology, alert/log/metric pointers, ownership, runbooks, and similar incidents. If ticket fields are sparse, probe the four golden-signal families with bounded follow-ups. See `references/incident-investigation.md`. Output a four-signal matrix, hypotheses, confidence, next checks, and mitigation options; never call a mitigation the root cause without the causal mechanism. ### Post-Incident Root Cause / Learning Use after mitigation/recovery when drafting or evaluating a postmortem/PIR. Pair the incident with the PIR, linked docs, final comms, remediation PRs, and action items; cover confirmed mitigation, causal mechanism, 5-why chain, and detection/response gaps. See `references/pir-root-cause.md`. Output root cause, contributing factors, mitigation-versus-cause, and prioritized actions. ### Assets / Asset Refresh Build contributors from project/goal/Jira/PR/doc/activity evidence. Inspect Assets schema/type metadata before AQL; join people via discovered user-like attributes such as `Calculated user`. Rank by contribution centrality plus asset risk, and report confidence and gaps. See `references/assets.md`. ### Capacity / Staffing / Meetings For staffing, resolve project/topic/org and identify people by related work, ownership, review influence, docs, and project/goal involvement; check load before recommending. For meetings, query scoped recordings, preview transcripts first, fetch full transcripts only for central ones, then summarize decisions, action items, and gaps. ## Output Shape - Lead with severity, urgency, or recommendation, then owner, status, recency, impact, confidence, and evidence. - For active investigations, add a four-signal evidence matrix and an incident-to-learning timeline with confirmed problem, mitigation, root-cause status, and prevention action. - Group patterns across artifacts, give ranked next actions with a suggested owner, and call out data gaps (missing transcripts, no asset match, stale update, ACL/auth gaps, weak ownership). ## Anti-Patterns - Do not fetch every transcript or page body, or treat every incident mention as a live risk. - Do not wait for chat/comments to label RCA before surfacing directional hypotheses for pre-PIR investigation. - Do not call mitigation root cause without an established mechanism. Do not treat workflow panels, bot comments, or opaque fields as RCA narrative. - Do not use keyword matches alone as org ownership — cross-check assignee, service owner, PIR participants, or org-tree membership. - Do not join Assets by display-name guesses before inspecting schema/type fields, or recommend staffing from activity counts alone. ## References - `references/assets.md` - schema-first Assets queries and person/device joins - `references/reliability-review.md` - bounded incident/PIR leadership review - `references/incident-investigation.md` - active investigation and mitigation - `references/pir-root-cause.md` - post-mitigation root-cause and PIR workflow
عرض على GitHub