Draw a task's blast radius twice. BEFORE implementing, a PLANNED map of the modules the missions expect to add, change or touch; AFTER the reviewers pass, an ACTUAL map derived from the real diff, plus the DRIFT between them. Writes…
Scan a codebase for deepening opportunities, present them as a visual HTML report, then grill through whichever one you pick. Informed by the domain language in CONTEXT.md and the decisions in docs/adr/. Use when the user wants to improve architecture, find…
Shared vocabulary and principles for designing deep modules — small interfaces, clean seams, testable through the interface. Use when designing or improving a module's interface, deciding where a seam goes, hunting deepening opportunities, making code more…
Pre-implementation critic. Spins up a read-only domain critic that challenges a drafted plan — a task's missions or a roadmap's task graph — against the ubiquitous language, CONTEXT.md, and ADRs, and pushes back ONLY on genuine conflicts. Silent when the plan…
Grilling session that challenges your plan against the existing domain model, sharpens terminology, and updates documentation (CONTEXT.md, ADRs) inline as decisions crystallise. Use when user wants to stress-test a plan against their project's language and…
Grilling session that challenges your plan against the existing domain model, sharpens terminology, and updates documentation (CONTEXT.md, ADRs) inline as decisions crystallise. Parks the rare question you genuinely can't answer yet as an unresolved question…
Cross-plan coherence critic for a whole roadmap. Reads roadmap.md plus every planned task's progress-tracker.md and pushes back ONLY on genuine discrepancies BETWEEN the finished plans — broken seams, coverage gaps, duplicated work, reversed/missing edges,…
Post-implementation review. Spins up three read-only critics on a completed task's diff — cleaner-architecture, slop-defender, reusability-inspector — that push back ONLY on real issues. Autonomous runs apply safe fixes (tests-green-gated) and write…