diagnose-crash

name

diagnose-crash

description

Diagnose why a program crashed on this machine, from a systemd-coredump core dump. Use when a process has segfaulted, aborted, or otherwise dumped core, when asked why an application crashed or disappeared, or when a "Process crashed:" desktop notification is acted on. Triggers: crash, segfault, SIGSEGV, SIGABRT, core dump, coredumpctl, "why did X crash", "X keeps crashing", backtrace symbolization. Covers reporting a confirmed Omarchy bug upstream — see reporting.md.

Diagnosing a Crash

Work from evidence. The goal is an honest account of what happened, not a plausible-sounding story.

Establish the facts

coredumpctl info <pid> is the starting point. Beyond the backtrace, note the command line the process was started with — it usually reveals what the program was working on when it died, which is often the whole answer.

coredumpctl list shows whether this crash is a one-off or a pattern. Repeated crashes of the same program, or several programs dying together, point somewhere different than a single failure does.

Rule out the boring causes first

Check resource exhaustion before blaming the program: free -h, and the journal for OOM kills. A process killed by the OOM killer is not a bug in that process.

Correlate against the timeline

The crash timestamp is the most underused piece of evidence. Compare it against:

• Filesystem mtimes. A directory or file whose mtime lands on the same second as the crash strongly suggests what triggered it.
• The journal around that moment, for related warnings from the same or neighbouring processes.
• Recent package updates. A crash that starts right after an update points at the update.

Read the whole core, not just frame 0

Thread stacks other than the crashing one show what work was in flight — thumbnailers, image loaders, IPC readers, GPU queues. That context often explains the trigger even when the crashing frame itself cannot be symbolized.

Note any third-party code in the address space: file-manager or browser extensions, plugins, out-of-tree drivers. In-process third-party code is a common crash source and worth flagging — but do not pin blame on it without evidence that it is actually implicated.

Symbolize when you can

This is Arch, which runs a public debuginfod server:

core=$(mktemp -t crash-XXXXXX.core)
trap 'rm -f "$core"' EXIT
coredumpctl dump <pid> --output="$core"
DEBUGINFOD_URLS="https://debuginfod.archlinux.org" \
  gdb -q <executable> "$core" \
  -batch -ex 'set debuginfod enabled on' -ex 'bt'

A core is a verbatim copy of the process's memory and can hold passwords, tokens, and private documents. Write it to a fresh mktemp path rather than a predictable shared one, and delete it when you are done — never leave it lying in /tmp.

Many packages publish no debug symbols. When frames stay unresolved, say so — never invent function names to fill the gap. An unsymbolized stack still has shape: which library each frame belongs to, and whether the crash came from a signal handler, a main loop, or a worker thread.

Report

1. What crashed, and what it was doing at the time.
2. The most likely mechanism — separating clearly what the evidence proves from what you are inferring.
3. Whether any user data was lost, and where it can be recovered from. Check the trash before concluding anything is gone.
4. Whether it is likely to recur, and what would avoid or fix it.

Be straight about the limits of the evidence. If the cause is genuinely ambiguous, say so rather than assembling confidence out of guesswork.

Leave the system as you found it. Diagnosis reads; it does not fix, tidy, or reconfigure. The one thing to clean up is your own: delete the core you extracted above, which is a copy of the crashed process's memory.

If it is an Omarchy bug

Most application crashes are upstream bugs in those applications, not Omarchy's doing. In the minority of cases where the cause really does sit within Omarchy's sphere of control, read reporting.md before offering to file anything.