Skip to main content

cache-policy-comparison

Compare and implement eviction policies (LRU, LFU, FIFO, S3FIFO, ARC) for bounded-capacity caches. Use when choosing or implementing an eviction policy for a buffer pool, page cache, CDN edge, or LLM KV cache, or when writing a replay simulator that supports multiple policies. Clarifies recency vs frequency semantics, queue topology, saturating counters, ghost buffers, and the second-chance rule that distinguishes modern FIFO-family policies from classic LRU.

معلومات المصدر

المستودع
benchflow-ai/skillsbench
آخر نشاط في المصدر
٤ مايو ٢٠٢٦ في ٢٣:٢٨
لغة SKILL.md المكتشفة
الإنجليزية
النجوم
١٬٨٣٠
التفرعات
٣٧٠

خيارات التثبيت

يُحدَّد Prompt الذي يراجع المصدر أولًا بشكل افتراضي. يمكنك التبديل إلى أمر مباشر أو تنزيل نسخة محلية.

مراجعة ملفات المصدر

اقرأ SKILL.md وأي ملفات مرافقة يعرضها SkillsMP قبل أن تقرر التثبيت.

عرض SKILL.md

SKILL.md
تعليمات المصدر · معاينة للقراءة فقط
name
cache-policy-comparison
description
Compare and implement eviction policies (LRU, LFU, FIFO, S3FIFO, ARC) for bounded-capacity caches. Use when choosing or implementing an eviction policy for a buffer pool, page cache, CDN edge, or LLM KV cache, or when writing a replay simulator that supports multiple policies. Clarifies recency vs frequency semantics, queue topology, saturating counters, ghost buffers, and the second-chance rule that distinguishes modern FIFO-family policies from classic LRU.
# Overview An eviction policy decides which resident entry a cache removes when a new entry is admitted beyond capacity. Four policies cover almost every replay-and-measure task: | Policy | Data structure | On hit | On admit | Eviction choice | |----------|---------------------------------|------------------------------|--------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------| | LRU | OrderedDict | Move to tail | Append at tail | Pop head | | LFU | `{key: freq}` + insertion order | `freq[k] += 1` | `freq[k] = 1` | Min `freq`, tiebreak by insertion order | | FIFO | OrderedDict | Nothing | Append at tail | Pop head | | S3FIFO | Three FIFO queues + `freq[k]` | `freq[k] = min(freq+1, cap)` | Admit to small; ghost-hit admits to main | Second-chance on main; small drains to main/ghost | Each has subtleties that trip naive implementations. # LRU Use an `OrderedDict` where the tail is the most-recently-accessed key. On hit, `move_to_end`. On miss + insert, append; pop from head if over capacity. Most common bug: **forgetting to update recency on a hit**. Without the refresh, LRU degenerates to FIFO — hit rate drops substantially on any workload with recency structure. ```python from collections import OrderedDict class LRU: def __init__(self, capacity): self.capacity = capacity self._d = OrderedDict() def contains(self, k): return k in self._d def access(self, k): if k in self._d: self._d.move_to_end(k) else: self._d[k] = None if len(self._d) > self.capacity: self._d.popitem(last=False) ``` # LFU Keep `freq: dict[key, int]` and a tie-breaker — an insertion counter is simplest and deterministic. On hit, increment `freq[k]`. On miss at capacity, evict `min(freq)` with ties broken by insertion order (oldest first). Typical bugs: - **No tie-breaker.** `min(freq.items(), key=lambda x: x[1])[0]` has implementation-defined behaviour across interpreters and distributions. Always include a secondary key. - **Frequency pollution.** A block that was hot once and then went cold can linger forever because its freq is permanently above newcomers. Production systems add aging (periodic decay of freq) or combine with a recency signal (W-TinyLFU). Pure LFU is correct for the task as specified but fragile in practice. # FIFO One queue, insertion order, no hit-time update. Useful as a lower-bound baseline. Do NOT call it "LRU without hit update" — conceptually different even when implementations overlap. Hit on a FIFO cache is still a hit for accounting; the block just does not change rank. # S3FIFO A modern FIFO-family policy (Yang et al., SOSP 2023) that matches or beats LRU on typical web and LLM workloads with a fraction of the bookkeeping cost — which is why recent production systems (Twitter, Google) have been switching to it. The full algorithm — three queues, saturating frequency counter, second-chance eviction on the main queue — is implemented in the `prefix-cache-replay` skill. Consult that skill if your task uses S3FIFO. # Workload implications - Strong **recency** → LRU wins slightly. - Stable **hot set** with long tail (Zipf) → LFU or S3FIFO. - Nearly uniform random → all converge toward `capacity / working_set` hit rate. - **Prefix-shared LLM workloads** are mixed — shared prefixes are both recent and frequent, so LRU/LFU/S3FIFO typically sit within a few percent of each other at the same capacity, but they differ in which blocks remain resident at end-of-trace, and their miss-handling costs diverge. Measure, don't assume. # Comparing hit rates on a trace Replay the same trace through each policy at identical capacity, record `total_hit_tokens / total_prompt_tokens` and the final resident set. Do not compare hit rate alone — also compare: - Final residency — how many unique blocks are resident at the end. Under S3FIFO this is often strictly less than capacity because ghost entries absorb the admission pressure. - Per-request hit-token distribution — two policies can have similar overall hit rate but very different per-request variance. - Admission effort — under policies with ghost structures, the bookkeeping cost per access is non-trivial. # Common mistakes - Reusing an LRU implementation when the task specifies S3FIFO (or vice versa). The final hit rate and residency will both differ; no partial credit for "close enough". - Making ghost count as resident, or treating a ghost hit as a hit for token accounting. - Forgetting to saturate `freq` — unbounded counters turn the main-queue second-chance loop into a spin. - Under LFU, using Python `min(d.items(), key=d.get)` without an explicit insertion-order tiebreaker. - Misordering admission and residency check. Always check `h ∈ cache` BEFORE applying the admission side effects of the current request, otherwise every request self-hits. - Final cache size off by small constants because you forgot to exclude ghost or you forgot to subtract the S-cap vs M-cap split.
عرض على GitHub