| name | cvis - Creator Vision Analysis |
| description | Analyze a project from the creator's perspective. Articulates the vision, checks whether current work serves it, identifies vision drift, and recommends corrections. |
| output | {"format":"prose"} |
Creator Vision Analysis
Input: $ARGUMENTS
Step 1: Articulate the Vision
Extract and formalize the creator's vision, whether explicit or implicit.
PROJECT: [what is being analyzed]
CREATOR: [who created it / whose vision]
EXPLICIT VISION (stated):
- [stated goals, mission, purpose]
IMPLICIT VISION (inferred from choices):
- [pattern 1] suggests: [inferred goal]
- [pattern 2] suggests: [inferred goal]
CORE VISION STATEMENT:
[One clear sentence capturing what this project is trying to be]
VISION BOUNDARIES:
- This IS about: [what's in scope]
- This is NOT about: [what's deliberately excluded]
- The audience IS: [who it's for]
- The audience is NOT: [who it's not for]
Step 2: Check Alignment
Evaluate whether current work serves the articulated vision.
ALIGNMENT CHECK:
| Component/Decision | Serves Vision? | How | Confidence |
|-------------------|---------------|-----|------------|
| [item 1] | YES / NO / PARTIAL | [explanation] | [HIGH/MED/LOW] |
| [item 2] | YES / NO / PARTIAL | [explanation] | [HIGH/MED/LOW] |
...
STRONGLY ALIGNED (vision amplifiers):
1. [component] — Why: [how it embodies the vision]
WEAKLY ALIGNED (technically compatible but not advancing):
1. [component] — Why: [it doesn't conflict but doesn't help either]
MISALIGNED (working against the vision):
1. [component] — Why: [how it contradicts or dilutes the vision]
Step 3: Identify Vision Drift
Detect where the project has drifted from its original or core vision.
VISION DRIFT ANALYSIS:
DRIFT INDICATORS:
1. [indicator] — Original direction: [X] → Current direction: [Y]
Drift cause: [feature creep / external pressure / lost focus / evolution]
2. [indicator] — Original direction: [X] → Current direction: [Y]
Drift cause: [reason]
DRIFT TYPE:
- Gradual expansion: [scope growing beyond vision?]
- Audience shift: [serving different users than intended?]
- Priority inversion: [secondary goals overtaking primary?]
- Identity confusion: [trying to be too many things?]
DRIFT SEVERITY: [NONE / MINOR / MODERATE / MAJOR]
DRIFT TRAJECTORY: [getting worse / stable / self-correcting]
Step 4: Vision Coherence
Assess whether the vision itself is clear and internally consistent.
VISION COHERENCE:
CLARITY: [HIGH/MED/LOW]
- Can someone new understand what this is trying to be? [Y/N — why]
INTERNAL CONSISTENCY: [HIGH/MED/LOW]
- Contradictions found:
1. [goal A] conflicts with [goal B] because [reason]
ACHIEVABILITY: [HIGH/MED/LOW]
- Vision vs. reality gap: [description]
- Resources match ambition? [Y/N]
DISTINCTIVENESS: [HIGH/MED/LOW]
- Would someone confuse this with [alternative]? [Y/N — why]
Step 5: Recommend Corrections
RECOMMENDATIONS:
VISION REFINEMENT (if the vision itself needs work):
- [suggestion for clarifying or sharpening the vision]
REALIGNMENT ACTIONS (if execution drifted from vision):
1. [action] — Fixes: [drift] — Priority: [HIGH/MED/LOW]
2. [action] — Fixes: [drift] — Priority: [HIGH/MED/LOW]
THINGS TO STOP DOING:
- [activity] — Reason: [doesn't serve vision]
THINGS TO START DOING:
- [activity] — Reason: [would serve vision]
THINGS TO KEEP DOING:
- [activity] — Reason: [strongly aligned with vision]
VISION HEALTH: [STRONG / HEALTHY / DRIFTING / AT RISK]
Integration
Use with:
/ecomp -> Check if the ecosystem matches the vision/gapf -> Find gaps between vision and current reality/usnd -> Validate that the vision addresses real user needs
