القائمة
Identify options that dominate others — strictly better on all dimensions, or better on some and equal on the rest.
يُحدَّد Prompt الذي يراجع المصدر أولًا بشكل افتراضي. يمكنك التبديل إلى أمر مباشر أو تنزيل نسخة محلية.
اقرأ SKILL.md وأي ملفات مرافقة يعرضها SkillsMP قبل أن تقرر التثبيت.
التثبيت باستخدام Codex أو Claude انسخ هذا Prompt والصقه في Codex أو Claude أو مساعد آخر ليراجع صفحة Skill ويثبّتها لك.
يتجاوز الأمر المباشر Prompt المخصّص للمراجعة. افحص المصدر قبل تشغيله.
npx skills add https://github.com/benjam3n/reasoningtool --skill dom-dominance-analysisيبقى الأمر في سطر واحد. مرّر أفقيًا لمراجعته كاملًا قبل النسخ.
تفضّل نسخة محلية؟ نزّل الملفات المتاحة حاليًا لدى SkillsMP.
Route any input through a branching question tree to narrow down the optimal response strategy before writing. Two stages — PERCEIVE (classify input) then ACT (select response). Covers all prompt types.
Generate exhaustive guesses about user input using ALL search methods with coverage tracking. Guessing is SEARCH through possibility space. Tracks space created vs space covered to ensure comprehensive exploration.
Systematically evaluate and select from a set of guesses, options, or possibilities. Combines ARAW analysis with prioritization to determine which guesses are strong, weak, actionable, or eliminable.
استنادا إلى تصنيف SOC المهني
عرض SKILL.md
| name | dom - Dominance Analysis |
| description | Identify options that dominate others — strictly better on all dimensions, or better on some and equal on the rest. |
| output | {"format":"prose"} |
Input: $ARGUMENTS
List all options being compared. If not provided, generate the obvious option set.
OPTIONS:
1. [option A]
2. [option B]
3. [option N]
What dimensions matter for this comparison?
For each dimension:
DIMENSIONS:
1. [dim 1] — [MAX/MIN/THRESHOLD]
2. [dim 2] — [MAX/MIN/THRESHOLD]
...
Rate each option on each dimension. Use consistent scales.
| Dim 1 | Dim 2 | Dim 3 | ...
Option A | | | |
Option B | | | |
Option C | | | |
Option X strictly dominates Option Y if X is better on EVERY dimension.
For each pair of options:
DOMINANCE RESULTS:
- [Option A] strictly dominates [Option C] — better on all dimensions
- [Option B] weakly dominates [Option C] — better on 2, equal on 1
- [Option A] vs [Option B] — neither dominates (Pareto optimal pair)
DOMINATED OPTIONS (can eliminate):
- [Option C] — dominated by A and B
PARETO FRONTIER (non-dominated):
- [Option A], [Option B]
Sometimes an option loses on one trivial dimension but wins on everything else.
For each non-dominated pair:
Flag any option that is "almost dominated" — loses on only one low-weight dimension.
Before concluding, check:
DOMINANCE ANALYSIS:
Eliminated (dominated): [list]
Pareto frontier: [list of non-dominated options]
If one option dominates all others:
DOMINANT OPTION: [X] — strictly better on all dimensions, choose this.
If Pareto frontier has multiple options:
TRADE-OFF: [X] vs [Y]
- Choose [X] if you prioritize [dim]
- Choose [Y] if you prioritize [dim]
Key insight: [what the dominance analysis reveals]
Use with:
/cmp -> Full comparison when no option dominates/cba -> Cost-benefit when trade-offs need quantifying/dd -> Discover dimensions you might have missed/obv -> Add obvious checks before concluding