| name | undr - Under-Represented Analysis |
| description | Analyzes an under-served area to determine what it needs. Assesses current coverage, identifies gaps relative to demand, and recommends build order. |
| output | {"format":"prose"} |
Under-Represented Analysis
Input: $ARGUMENTS
Step 1: Identify the Area
Define the under-served area precisely. What is it, and why does it seem under-represented?
AREA: [The area under analysis]
BELONGS TO: [The larger category or system it sits within]
SIGNAL OF UNDER-REPRESENTATION: [What made you notice this area is under-served?]
Step 2: Assess Current Coverage
Inventory what currently exists in this area.
EXISTING COVERAGE:
1. [Item 1] — quality: [HIGH/MEDIUM/LOW] — coverage: [what it handles]
2. [Item 2] — quality: [HIGH/MEDIUM/LOW] — coverage: [what it handles]
3. [Item 3] — quality: [HIGH/MEDIUM/LOW] — coverage: [what it handles]
...
TOTAL ITEMS: [count]
QUALITY DISTRIBUTION: [How many high/medium/low]
COVERAGE MAP: [What percentage of the area is currently served?]
Step 3: Identify What's Missing
Compare current coverage to what the area actually needs.
DEMAND SIGNALS:
- [Evidence of need 1]
- [Evidence of need 2]
- [Evidence of need 3]
GAPS (what's missing relative to demand):
1. [Gap 1] — demand level: [HIGH/MEDIUM/LOW]
2. [Gap 2] — demand level: [HIGH/MEDIUM/LOW]
3. [Gap 3] — demand level: [HIGH/MEDIUM/LOW]
...
MOST CRITICAL GAP: [Which gap causes the most pain if left unfilled?]
Step 4: Estimate Effort to Fill Gaps
For each gap, estimate what it would take to address it.
GAP 1 — [name]:
- Effort: [LOW/MEDIUM/HIGH]
- Dependencies: [What else needs to exist first?]
- Complexity: [Simple addition or requires new infrastructure?]
GAP 2 — [name]:
- Effort: [LOW/MEDIUM/HIGH]
- Dependencies: [What else needs to exist first?]
- Complexity: [Simple addition or requires new infrastructure?]
[Repeat for each gap]
Step 5: Prioritize and Recommend Build Order
Rank gaps by impact-to-effort ratio and recommend a sequence.
PRIORITY RANKING (by impact / effort):
1. [Gap] — impact: [H/M/L], effort: [H/M/L] — DO FIRST
2. [Gap] — impact: [H/M/L], effort: [H/M/L]
3. [Gap] — impact: [H/M/L], effort: [H/M/L]
...
RECOMMENDED BUILD ORDER:
Phase 1: [What to build first and why]
Phase 2: [What to build next]
Phase 3: [What can wait]
SKIP: [Anything that seems like a gap but isn't worth filling — and why]
Integration
Use with:
/satr -> Check if the parent category is over-served elsewhere/ctgp -> Formal category gap analysis/efrt -> Detailed effort estimation for top-priority gaps/benf -> Estimate benefits of filling each gap
