| name | gap-analysis |
| description | Analyze research gaps using Research Harness paper pools and extracted evidence. Trigger on phrases like "gap-analysis", "/gap-analysis", "研究空白分析", "找研究 gap", or equivalent requests to identify underexplored questions, missing baselines, or contradictory findings. |
| public_suite | research |
| task_type | analysis |
| data_access_level | local |
| inputs | topic_id, paper pool, extracted claims, baseline context |
| outputs | candidate gaps, novelty risks, baseline gaps, next experiments |
| gates | every gap claim must cite paper-pool evidence or be labeled speculative |
| artifact_schemas | gap_report, literature_map |
| estimated_runtime | 10-30 min |
Gap Analysis
Use this skill when the user wants candidate research opportunities grounded in evidence.
Workflow
- Confirm the topic and relevant paper set.
- Review claims, baselines, and contradictions first.
- Use
gap_detect if available.
- Separate:
- evidence-backed gaps
- speculative opportunities
- Recommend the most defensible next direction.