Skip to main content

data-handling-template

Data handling plan generator — evidence retention, encryption, chain-of-custody, compliance frameworks (GDPR / HIPAA / PCI-DSS / SOC2).

الانتقال إلى التثبيت

معلومات المصدر

المستودع
BitterSecurity/Decepticon
آخر نشاط في المصدر
٢ يونيو ٢٠٢٦ في ١٧:٤٦
لغة SKILL.md المكتشفة
الإنجليزية
النجوم
٥٬٥٢٢
التفرعات
١٬٠٤٨

خيارات التثبيت

يُحدَّد Prompt الذي يراجع المصدر أولًا بشكل افتراضي. يمكنك التبديل إلى أمر مباشر أو تنزيل نسخة محلية.

مراجعة ملفات المصدر

اقرأ SKILL.md وأي ملفات مرافقة يعرضها SkillsMP قبل أن تقرر التثبيت.

عرض SKILL.md

SKILL.md
تعليمات المصدر · معاينة للقراءة فقط
name
data-handling-template
description
Data handling plan generator — evidence retention, encryption, chain-of-custody, compliance frameworks (GDPR / HIPAA / PCI-DSS / SOC2).
allowed-tools
Read Write Edit
metadata
{"subdomain":"planning","when_to_use":"create data handling plan, evidence retention, chain-of-custody, GDPR, HIPAA, PCI-DSS, compliance, PII handling","tags":"data-handling, evidence, retention, encryption, chain-of-custody, compliance, gdpr, hipaa","upstream_ref":"Soundwave data-handling template — evidence retention, encryption, chain-of-custody, compliance"}
# Data Handling Plan Generator The data handling plan defines **what evidence the agent collects, where it lives, how long it's kept, and who can read it**. Replaces the deprecated free-form `RoE.data_handling` string with structured per-class fields. ## When to Use - After RoE is written (RoE constraints + scope drive which data classes appear) - User says "create data handling", "retention policy", "evidence storage", "PII handling", "compliance" ## Workflow ### Step 1: Start From the Schema Defaults The `DataHandlingPlan` schema seeds four default classes — credentials, pii, source-code, business-data — with conservative retention. **Keep these by default**; override only when the engagement requires stricter or looser rules. ### Step 2: Add Engagement-Specific Classes Based on the interview: | Engagement type | Likely additional classes | |---|---| | Healthcare client | `health-records` (classification: secret, retention: 7 days, framework: HIPAA) | | Financial client | `cardholder-data` (classification: secret, retention: 0 days — never store, framework: PCI-DSS) | | EU client / data subjects | Mark existing `pii` with framework: GDPR; consider `personal-data-eu` for stricter handling | | Defense / classified | `controlled-unclassified` (classification: secret, retention: 0 days off-network) | ### Step 3: Set Evidence Storage Path Default `"/workspace/<engagement>/evidence/"` works for sandbox-isolated engagements. Override only when: - Engagement requires an external-bucket destination (S3 / Azure Blob with client KMS) - Multiple engagement workspaces share an evidence repository ### Step 4: Compliance Frameworks Set `compliance_frameworks` from the interview. Common entries: GDPR, HIPAA, PCI-DSS, SOC2, NIST 800-53, FedRAMP, ISO 27001. The orchestrator (Decepticon) reads this list and refuses to start objectives that violate the matching framework's evidence-handling rules. ### Step 5: Purge Hard Cap `purge_after_days` is the GLOBAL upper bound — every artifact older than this is deleted regardless of per-class retention. Default 90 days; reduce for engagements with tighter regulatory exposure. ## Validation Checklist Before writing `plan/data-handling.json`: - [ ] At least one `data_class` is `credentials`-equivalent - [ ] Every class has `retention_days >= 0` - [ ] `purge_after_days >= max(class.retention_days)` (otherwise classes get cut short) - [ ] If `compliance_frameworks` includes HIPAA / GDPR / PCI-DSS, matching data classes exist - [ ] `chain_of_custody=True` for any engagement that may produce findings ## Anti-patterns - Setting `retention_days=0` for `credentials` without explicit operator approval — agent then can't reference creds across phases - Disabling `encryption_at_rest` for any restricted+ class — straight compliance violation - Listing HIPAA in `compliance_frameworks` without a `health-records` class — orchestrator will refuse objectives that touch PHI ## Output Write to `plan/data-handling.json` validating against `decepticon.core.schemas.DataHandlingPlan`.
عرض على GitHub