Skip to main content

qa

QA-test a website or web app and return a 1-5 quality score (5 = flawless, 1 = broken) with evidence. Use when the user wants to test, QA, evaluate, score, or "check how good" a site, page, flow, or app — including a local dev server (e.g. "qa test localhost:5173", "does the checkout work?", "rate this landing page"). Drives a real Browser Use cloud browser, tunneling localhost automatically.

معلومات المصدر

المستودع
browser-use/plugins
آخر نشاط في المصدر
١١ يوليو ٢٠٢٦ في ١٨:٤٢
لغة SKILL.md المكتشفة
الإنجليزية
النجوم
٢٤
التفرعات
٩

خيارات التثبيت

يُحدَّد Prompt الذي يراجع المصدر أولًا بشكل افتراضي. يمكنك التبديل إلى أمر مباشر أو تنزيل نسخة محلية.

مراجعة ملفات المصدر

اقرأ SKILL.md وأي ملفات مرافقة يعرضها SkillsMP قبل أن تقرر التثبيت.

مستكشف الملفات
2 ملفات

عرض SKILL.md

SKILL.md
تعليمات المصدر · معاينة للقراءة فقط
name
qa
description
QA-test a website or web app and return a 1-5 quality score (5 = flawless, 1 = broken) with evidence. Use when the user wants to test, QA, evaluate, score, or "check how good" a site, page, flow, or app — including a local dev server (e.g. "qa test localhost:5173", "does the checkout work?", "rate this landing page"). Drives a real Browser Use cloud browser, tunneling localhost automatically.
# QA Drive a website with a real browser, judge how well it does the thing the user asked about, and return a **score from 1 (broken) to 5 (excellent)** with evidence. The deliverable is a verdict, not a screenshot dump. ## Inputs From the user's invocation (the text after `/qa`, or their message): - **Target** — a URL (`https://…`) or a local dev server (`localhost:5173`, `:3000`, "the app on 5173"). **Required** — if absent, ask for it before doing anything else. - **What to test** (optional) — a flow or focus ("the signup", "search + filters"). If omitted, test the most obvious happy path and say so in the report. ## Dependency: browser-harness (required — install it yourself) This skill runs the test through **browser-harness** — a separate CLI you install once. It is not optional; QA must run on a real Browser Use cloud browser, never the user's local Chrome. **Before anything else, verify it's available:** ```bash command -v browser-harness && browser-harness <<'PY' print("browser-harness OK") PY ``` If `browser-harness` is **not** on `PATH`, **install it yourself — don't make the user do it.** QA runs on a *cloud* browser, so the CLI is all you need: none of browser-harness's local-browser setup (`chrome://inspect`, the "Allow remote debugging" popup) applies here — skip all of it. The install is one-time (~30s), no clone: ```bash command -v uv || curl -LsSf https://astral.sh/uv/install.sh | sh # the uv installer, only if missing export PATH="$HOME/.local/bin:$PATH" # uv and its tool shims land here; the installer doesn't update the current shell's PATH uv tool install --python 3.12 --upgrade browser-harness # latest stable release from PyPI command -v browser-harness # verify it's on PATH now ``` (No `uv` and can't `curl | sh`? Install uv per https://docs.astral.sh/uv/getting-started/installation/ then re-run the `uv tool install` line — or `pipx install browser-harness`.) Do not attempt to QA with anything other than browser-harness + a cloud browser. ## Procedure 1. **Confirm the target is reachable** (`curl -s -o /dev/null -w "%{http_code}" <url>`), and identify what the app is (title, README) so you can frame a sensible test task. 2. **Read `references/methodology.md`** in this skill directory and follow it exactly. It defines: how to get a Browser Use API key (or self-sign-up), how to tunnel a localhost app and point a cloud browser at it, the field-tested gotchas (host-header rewrite, proxy-off, the per-tab interstitial header, CORS-pinned APIs), the test loop, the 1-5 rubric, and the output format. 3. **Run the test**, then **tear everything down** (stop the cloud browser so it stops billing; kill the tunnel). 4. **Return the verdict**: lead with `Score: N/5`, then task, result, what worked, issues (tagged), edge cases tried, and screenshot evidence — exactly as `references/methodology.md` specifies. Scale effort to the ask: a quick "does X work?" is a few interactions and one score; "thoroughly QA this" warrants more flows and edge cases. Keep the verdict honest, specific, and reproducible.
عرض على GitHub