| name | amanthro-tables-figures |
| description | Use when building exhibits for an American Anthropologist (AA) manuscript — photographs, maps, site plans, artifact images, kinship diagrams, transcripts, evidence tables, and multimodal media — so they are self-contained, accessible (alt text), ethically cleared (consent, permissions), and count toward the word budget. Designs exhibits; it does not run analysis or clear permissions for you. |
Tables, Figures & Multimodal Exhibits (amanthro-tables-figures)
At AA, exhibits do more than display numbers — a photograph, a map, a site plan, a kinship chart, or a
film clip can carry the argument, and the Multimodal Anthropologies section treats media as
scholarship in its own right. Exhibits also cost words (the Research-Article count includes figures,
tables, references, and notes), and they carry ethical and rights obligations that other fields'
charts do not.
When to trigger
- Designing the key photograph, map, site plan, artifact image, kinship/network diagram, or table
- Preparing a transcript or evidence table linking claims to sources
- Building a Multimodal Anthropologies piece where image/sound/film is the argument
- A reviewer found an exhibit unclear, unlabeled, or ethically/rights-problematic
Principles
- Self-contained. A reader understands each exhibit from its caption, labels, and note alone —
state place, date, what is shown, sample/N (for quantitative exhibits), and the source.
- The exhibit should argue. A photograph or map that merely decorates wastes scarce words; choose
exhibits that advance the interpretation (a contrast, a spatial pattern, a relational structure).
- Consent & dignity. People depicted have consented to that use; faces/identifiers are handled per
the consent given (blur or anonymize where required). Do not publish images that expose or endanger
interlocutors (see
amanthro-transparency-and-data).
- Permissions & rights. Secure permissions for archival images, museum objects, and others' media;
credit lines and licenses are correct. Heritage/community rights over images of cultural property and
ancestral remains are respected — some images should not be reproduced at all.
- Accessible. Provide alt text for figures; colorblind-safe and grayscale-legible where color
carries meaning; legible transcripts with transcription conventions stated.
- Reproducible (quant exhibits). Numbers in tables/plots match the underlying analysis exactly.
Discipline-specific exhibits
- Archaeology: site maps, stratigraphic sections, artifact plates, distribution maps, chronologies.
- Biological: measurement plots with uncertainty, morphological figures, sampling maps.
- Linguistic: interlinear glossed transcripts (with conventions), discourse excerpts.
- Sociocultural: field photographs (with consent), kinship/network diagrams, evidence tables.
Anti-patterns
- A photograph or map that decorates rather than argues (and still costs words)
- Images of identifiable people without consent for that use; exposing vulnerable interlocutors
- Reproducing sacred/heritage objects or ancestral remains against community wishes
- Missing permissions/credit for archival or museum images
- No alt text; color-only encoding that fails in grayscale; unlabeled transcript conventions
- Quantitative exhibit values that don't match the analysis
Output format
【Main exhibit】what it shows + why it argues (not decorates)
【Self-contained?】caption + labels + source + date/place present? [Y/N]
【Consent & rights】people consented / permissions secured / heritage respected? [Y/N]
【Accessible?】alt text + grayscale-legible + transcript conventions? [Y/N]
【Word-budget impact】noted (figures/tables count)
【Next】amanthro-writing-style
Exhibit decision table (by subfield)
| If your exhibit is… | The first question an AA editor/reviewer asks | The fix that clears it |
|---|
| A field photograph of people | Did they consent to this image being published? | Consent on file; blur/withhold per the consent; caption with place/date |
| A map or site plan | Does it reveal a protected/sacred location? | Generalize coordinates; consult the community before publishing |
| An artifact plate / museum image | Are permissions and credits secured; is it heritage-sensitive? | Clear rights; respect community authority; some objects are not reproduced |
| An interlinear transcript | Are transcription conventions stated and glosses legible? | State conventions; align glosses; translate fairly |
| A quantitative plot (bio/archaeo) | Does it show uncertainty, and do values match the analysis? | Plot intervals/effect sizes; reconcile numbers to the source |
| A multimodal piece (film/sound) | Does the media argue, with consent and access controls? | Make it carry analytic weight; document consent for the medium |
Calibration anchors (hedged)
- At AA, an exhibit is an ethical act, not just a display: consent, heritage authority, and the
dignity of the people shown can override the cleanest visualization.
- Exhibits cost words in Research Articles (the count includes figures, tables, references, and
notes), so a decorative image is doubly expensive — drop it or move support to where it argues.
- AA's current author guidance calls for TIF figures at 300 dpi or greater, captions, credits, alt text,
and image descriptions; confirm Research Exchange file prompts before final upload.
Supplementary resources
