| name | joc-submission |
| description | Use when running the final pre-submission preflight for the Journal of Communication (JoC) via Manuscript Central — format selection, double-anonymous preparation, page/abstract caps, APA-7th formatting, Word (.docx), the Data Availability Statement, and declarations. Final checks; it does not draft content. |
Submission Preflight (joc-submission)
The last check before pressing submit on Manuscript Central. JoC is double-anonymous, so the
single most common avoidable failure is an under-anonymized main document or supplement. Verify
volatile specifics on the official page before relying on them.
When to trigger
- "Submitting tomorrow" — last pass before upload
- Unsure which files/metadata Manuscript Central expects
- Confirming the page/abstract caps are met and the manuscript is properly anonymized
Process facts (verify volatile items on the official page)
- Owner / publisher: International Communication Association (ICA) / Oxford University Press.
- Portal: Manuscript Central (
mc.manuscriptcentral.com/jcom).
- Review model: double-anonymous — anonymize the main document and supplemental materials;
provide a separate title page.
- Formats: original research article (main document ≤ 35 pages), JoC Forum (3,000–6,000 words),
special-issue submissions.
- Abstract: ≤ 150 words.
- Length: main document ≤ 35 pages, including the abstract, main text, references, tables,
figures, and endnotes.
- Style & file: APA 7th edition; Microsoft Word (.docx) (PDF not accepted); 12-pt Times New
Roman, double-spaced, 1.0-inch margins.
- Self-citations: written in the third person.
- Transparency: Data Availability Statement required; preregistration is encouraged, not
required — note it in the cover letter; Open Science Badges are supported for open data, open
materials, and preregistration. No formal Registered Reports (Stage 1/Stage 2) track is confirmed
for JoC — do not assume one exists (需复核 on live calls-for-papers).
- Review process: double-anonymous; external review is usually by two or three referees
(需复核); formal desk-screening criteria are not enumerated on the official pages.
- Fee & open access: no submission fee (verified 2026-06-22); hybrid open-access option —
authors may pay an OA fee (APC) to make the accepted manuscript freely available. Read-and-Publish
agreements may cover the APC, and OUP offers Research4Life waivers (Tier 3) plus discretionary
waivers. The exact APC amount/currency is maintained separately by OUP and changes — confirm the
current figure on the live OUP charges page.
- Decision timeline: time-to-first-decision is reported approximately as within ~90–120 days;
treat as approximate and confirm on the live guidelines page (需复核).
Preflight checklist
Format & length
Anonymity (double-anonymous)
Format & metadata
Compliance & files
Desk-reject and return-to-author patterns (avoidable before upload)
At the ICA flagship the handling editor screens for fit and form before review. The failures that
most often trigger a return or an early decline are mechanical — fix them in the preflight:
| Trigger seen at intake | Editor action | Preflight fix |
|---|
| Author name in main doc or file properties | returned for anonymity | strip metadata; identity to the title page |
| Abstract > 150 words | returned for format | cut to ≤ 150; question + approach + finding |
| Main document > 35 pages (all elements counted) | returned for length | move robustness grids and codebooks out |
| PDF uploaded as main file | rejected at upload | submit Word (.docx) |
| No Data Availability Statement | flagged incomplete | add the DAS (repository + identifier, or exemption) |
| "Too narrow / platform-specific" intro | declined without review | reframe to field-wide reach |
Calibration anchor: what "ready" means at JoC (hedged)
A JoC-ready submission clears three bars at once: a theory-advancing contribution (not a bare
effect), valid message/exposure measurement an expert referee will trust, and broad
significance legible to ICA's readership. Volatile specifics — page rules, badge mechanics, exact
APC amount, reviewer count, decision timeline — drift; confirm against the current submission
guidelines.
Worked micro-example: a 5-minute anonymity sweep (illustrative)
Before upload, a content-analysis manuscript runs the sweep: (1) search the main doc for the author
surname — two first-person self-cites get rewritten in the third person; (2) an OSF link in the
supplement resolving to a named project page is swapped for a view-only anonymized link; (3) clear
the author field in document properties; (4) confirm the codebook and intercoder-reliability report
sit in the supplement, not the main text. All four would otherwise return the paper.
Anti-patterns
- Leaving author identifiers in the text, supplements, or file metadata (breaks anonymity)
- First-person self-references ("as we previously found") instead of third-person
- Submitting a PDF when JoC requires Word (.docx)
- Abstract over 150 words; main document over 35 pages
- Omitting the Data Availability Statement
Output format
【Format】Article / JoC Forum / Special issue (cap met? Y/N)
【Anonymized】main doc + supplements + file metadata clean? [Y/N]
【Self-citations third person】[Y/N]
【Abstract】word count (≤150)
【Length】≤ 35 pages incl. refs/tables/figures/endnotes? [Y/N]
【APA 7th + Word .docx】[Y/N]
【Data Availability Statement】included? [Y/N]
【Next】await decision → joc-rebuttal on R&R
Supplementary resources
