fix-linking

name	fix-linking
description	Design or audit internal link structure for a website. Use when the user asks about internal linking, link architecture, orphan pages, PageRank flow, anchor text, site structure, silo architecture, or why pages aren't ranking despite good content. For external link building, see build-links.
metadata	{"version":"1.0.0"}

Fix Linking

Design and audit internal link structures using hub-and-spoke topology, PageRank flow logic, and anchor text budgets.

Why Internal Links Matter

Internal links do two things: (1) pass PageRank between pages, and (2) signal topical relevance via anchor text. A page with zero incoming internal links is an orphan — invisible to authority flow regardless of content quality.

Architecture Model Selection

Before auditing links, choose the right architecture model for the site:

Model	Best For	Site Size	Key Characteristic
Hub-and-Spoke (Topic Cluster)	Content marketing, SaaS, publishers	50-500 pages	Bidirectional links between pillar and cluster articles
Silo Structure	E-commerce, directories, large enterprises	100+ categories	Vertical-only links within topic silos
Flat Architecture	Small sites, portfolios, startups	<100 pages	All pages within 2-3 clicks, cross-linked freely
Pyramid	News sites, large blogs, corporate	500+ pages	Top-down hierarchy, authority concentrates at top
Mesh/Matrix	Knowledge bases, wikis, help centers	Any	Free-form linking between any related pages

Key Metrics by Architecture

Metric	Hub-and-Spoke	Silo	Flat	Pyramid	Mesh
Target click depth	≤3	≤4	≤2	≤4	≤3
Internal links per page	5-10	3-7	8-15	3-5	8-15
Cross-section links	Many	Few	N/A	Some	Many
Authority distribution	Distributed to hubs	Top of silo	Even	Top-heavy	Even

Expected ROI from Architecture Changes

Change	Typical Impact	Timeline
Fix orphan pages	+15-30% traffic to those pages	2-4 weeks
Build first topic cluster	+10-25% traffic to cluster pages	4-8 weeks
Reduce click depth by 1 level	+5-15% crawl efficiency	2-6 weeks
Anchor text optimization	+5-10% ranking improvement	4-12 weeks
Full architecture migration	+20-50% overall organic traffic	3-6 months

Recommended for most sites: Hub-and-Spoke as the primary model, with silo-style isolation between unrelated topic areas.

Phase 1: Map the Current Structure

Before designing links, understand what exists:

1. Hub pages. Pages that aggregate links and distribute authority — homepage, category pages, pillar articles. List them.
2. Orphan pages. No incoming internal links from crawlable pages. They receive zero PageRank from the internal graph.
3. Link depth. How many clicks from the homepage does each important page require? Depth 4+ pages are effectively buried.
4. Anchor text. Repeated identical anchors are fine. Generic anchors ("click here", "read more") waste relevance signal.

Ask the user for their page list or sitemap, or work with what they describe.

Phase 2: Hub-and-Spoke Design

Hub Pages (pillar/category)

• Linked from homepage or main navigation
• Link out to all supporting pages in their cluster
• Serve as authority redistribution nodes

Spoke Pages (supporting/cluster articles)

• Receive at least 2-3 internal links from hub and sibling spokes
• Always link back to their hub page
• Link to 2-4 sibling spokes where contextually relevant
• Never link to competing pages (same keyword intent)

Cross-Cluster Links

• Only when there is genuine topical relevance
• Use to signal E-E-A-T connections (e.g., case study → methodology page)
• Limit to 1-2 per page to avoid diluting cluster coherence

Phase 3: Anchor Text Budget

For internal links, each page should receive anchor text in this distribution:

Anchor Type	Target Share	Example
Exact match	20-30%	"content decay detection"
Partial match	30-40%	"detecting when content decays"
Related/semantic	20-30%	"pages losing traffic"
Branded	5-10%	"our decay detection feature"
Generic	0-5%	"learn more"

Diversity improves relevance coverage for semantic search.

Phase 4: Orphan Page Resolution

For each orphan page, apply this decision tree:

1. Worth ranking? If no (thin, superseded), redirect to the closest relevant page. Stop.
2. Which cluster? Find the nearest hub page.
3. Which 2-3 existing pages would readers logically arrive from? These are injection points.
4. What anchor text fits naturally? Match the orphan page's target keyword.
5. Does the hub page need a content update to include a contextual reference?

Phase 5: Link Injection Plan

Produce a concrete action plan:

Source Page	Target Page	Suggested Anchor Text	Where on Source Page	Priority
/blog/seo-guide	/tools/keyword-research	"keyword research tool"	Under "Research Phase" heading	high
...	...	...	...	...

Priority = high if the target is a revenue-critical or high-intent page.

Output Format

Internal Link Audit: [domain]

Current State

• Orphan pages: [count or list]
• Average link depth for important pages: [value]
• Hub pages identified: [list]
• Anchor text diversity: [assessment]

Hub-and-Spoke Map For each cluster: Hub → [Spoke 1, Spoke 2, Spoke 3 ...]

Link Injection Plan [Table from Phase 5]

Anchor Text Fixes Pages where anchor text is entirely generic and needs replacement.

Recommendations

1. Orphan pages that are revenue-critical — link them first
2. Pages at depth 4+ that should be at depth 2 — add shortcuts via hub pages
3. Clusters with weak internal connectivity — add sibling cross-links
4. Pages with 0-1 incoming links that are important for conversions

---

Pro Tip: Try the free Internal Link Finder and Anchor Text Diversity tools at seojuice.com. SEOJuice MCP users can run /seojuice:site-health for instant orphan page detection, link depth distribution, and most-linked pages — the get_site_topology tool maps your entire internal link graph automatically.