| name | dataset-benchmark-discovery |
| description | Use when the user asks for latest datasets, benchmark suites, leaderboards, baseline or SOTA comparisons, dataset selection for experiments, or evidence that a paper needs complete experimental validation. This skill routes to the dataset_benchmark_discovery tool and keeps access/license limits explicit. |
Dataset Benchmark Discovery
Use this skill before experiment planning or manuscript drafting when the user
needs datasets, benchmarks, metrics, baselines, or leaderboard context.
Core Rules
- Prefer the
dataset_benchmark_discovery tool over generic browsing for dataset and benchmark mapping.
- Do not download restricted, login-gated, license-gated, or private data unless the user has provided access and the environment is configured for it.
- Treat
dataset_benchmark_map.json as a candidate map. It can support dataset selection and experiment planning, but it is not executed experimental evidence.
- Verify version/date, license, standard split, metric definition, and official leaderboard status before writing strong manuscript claims.
- Route actual evaluation to
experiment_lab, then use claim_support_matrix.json for manuscript claim support.
Workflow
- Call
dataset_benchmark_discovery(topic=..., scope=...).
- Review candidates by task fit, recency/version, license/access, metric alignment, and reproducibility risk.
- If the user wants experiments, choose feasible datasets and pass local paths or uploaded files into
experiment_lab.
- If writing a paper before experiments are complete, describe benchmark choices as planned validation, not completed results.
Output Discipline
When summarizing results, report:
- strongest candidate datasets/benchmarks
- access and license risks
- standard metrics and splits when detected
- baseline/SOTA hints when available
- what still needs manual verification