| name | competitive-battlecard |
| description | Produce a concise competitive battlecard focused on customer decision criteria, verified differences, proof, traps to avoid, and honest fit boundaries. |
Competitive Battlecard
Use when this procedure is the primary professional method needed for the assignment.
Procedure
- Confirm the decision or outcome this work must support, its scope, owner, constraints, and definition of success.
- Establish the evidence baseline using competitor product/pricing/docs, win/loss notes, customer objections, and internal capability proof. Do not fill material gaps with assumptions when they can change the result.
- Use current primary evidence, compare equivalent workflows, separate fact from inference, prepare counter-positioning without disparagement, and date the evidence.
- Exercise realistic edge, failure, transition, or exception cases that could invalidate the result; record unresolved uncertainty explicitly.
- Validate the output against the original outcome and any neighboring professional contracts so this skill does not silently absorb another specialist's authority.
- Record the resulting artifact, measurements, decisions, provenance, and handoff information needed for another owner to reproduce or continue the work.
Quality gate
Claims are current, comparable, sourced, and useful in a live customer decision.